The Archbishops of Los Angeles and Boston are in agreement. They agree that we do not know any exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. There is no known case of a non Catholic saved in invincible ignorance or a good conscience (LG 16) or ‘elements of sanctification’ (LG 8).
Archbishop José Horacio Gomez, the Archbishop of Los Angeles, California has not issued a denial or correction regarding the blog posts I have sent his office and many priests of the Archdiocese. There have also been no denials from the Ministries and Offices of the Archdiocese, who are well informed about the Catholic Faith.
Just like the Archdiocese of Boston and the dioceses of Worcester and Manchester, Archbishop Jose Gomez indicates Vatican Council II affirms the literal interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Ad Gentes 7 supports the dogma and Lumen Gentium 8 and 16 are not known exceptions. We cannot telephone or fax anyone saved in invincible ignorance or with implicit desire.
Fr. Leonard Feeney has changed our concept of interpreting Vatican Council II. He endorsed the literal interpretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation and rejected any known exception. It means LG 16, LG 8 are not exceptions to his interpretation of Vatican Council II. Vatican Council II supports Fr. Leonard Feeney.
Vatican Council II affirms the traditional Catholic teaching on other religions, ecumenism, ecclesiology, evangelization etc.
The Archbishops of Los Angeles and Boston can reject the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) doctrinal position on their being explicit known cases saved in invincible ignorance etc.
Presently the SSPX assumes Vatican Council II contradicts the traditional teaching on other religions, ecumenism etc when it is really their own interpretation of known exceptions which is at fault.
The Archdioceses are also contradicting Archbishop Augustine Di Noia, Vice President of Ecclesia Dei, Vatican. In the interview with the National Catholic Register ,Archbishop Di Noia when asked about extra ecclesiam nulla salus said that there were exceptions to the dogma in Vatican Council II which should not be retracted. He assumed that LG 8 contradicted the dogma.They should not be retracted because they do not contradict the dogma.
It may be mentioned that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, founder of the SSPX, said that a non Catholic can be saved in invincible ignorance and implicit desire. However Archbishop Lefebvre did not state that these cases were explicitly known to us or that they were explicit exceptions to the dogma outside the church no salvation.
Similarly Vatican Council II admits that non Catholics can be saved in invincible ignorance etc but does not state that these cases are explicit or known exceptions to Fr. Leonard Feeney.
If Archbishop Augustine Di Noia announces that we do not know any case saved who has not had the Gospel preached to him (in invincible ignorance) etc there could be no doctrinal difference between the Vatican and the SSPX on Vatican Council II.
The Holy Spirit teaches the Church before and after Vatican Council II that there is exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church and this is the message of the bishops.-Lionel Andrades
_______________________________________________________
He changed our concept of Vatican Council II
________________________________________________
ARCHBISHOP OF BOSTON SUPPORTS ST.BENEDICT CENTERS INSTEAD OF SSPX
CARDINAL SEAN O'MALLEY AGREES WITH FR.LEONARD FEENEY : EVERY ONE NEEDS TO ENTER THE CHURCH FOR SALVATION AND THERE ARE NO KNOWN EXCEPTIONS
BISHOPS OF BOSTON, WORCESTER, MANCHESTER AGREE WE DO NOT KNOW ANY CASE OF SOMEONE SAVED WITH IMPLICIT DESIRE OR INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE: SO THERE IS NO CONTRADICTION OF THE LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
BISHOP PETER LIBASCI AGREES WITH FR.LEONARD FEENEY’S COMMUNITY IN MANCHESTER : LG 16, LG 8 DO NOT CONTRADICT THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
SSPX TO WORK UNDER ‘SPOTTER’ BISHOPS IN BOSTON ETC IT IS NECESSARY TO CLARFIY THAT WE CANNOT SEE THE DEAD
SSPX VATICAN COUNCIL II IS IN AGREEMENT WITH THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS : ADDRESS THE PROBLEM OF ‘SPOTTING’ IN LUMEN GENTIUM 16 AND LUMEN GENTIUM
BISHOP PETER LIBASCI HAS A DIOCESE OF ‘SPOTTERS’
STAY AWAY FROM CHAPELS IN MANCHESTER,USA WHERE THEY CLAIM THEY ARE 'SPOTTERS': FIND A CHAPEL WHERE THE PRIEST AND CONGREGATION DO NOT DENY THE CREED, THE DOGMA AND VATICAN COUNCIL II
VOCATIONS IN BOSTON ?
Do you have a vocation? Join a religious community which affirms the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus along with Vatican Council II, does not know of a visible baptism of desire nor in a Profession of Faith imply ‘I believe in three baptisms for the forgiveness of sin’.
BISHOP GERHARD MULLER MADE TWO FUNDAMENTAL MISTAKES ON VATICAN COUNCIL II: HE ASSUMED LG 16 CONTRADICTS EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS AND HE DID NOT KNOW AG 7 SUPPORTS THE DOGMA
BISHOP GERHARD MULLER NEEDS TO ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II WHICH INDICATES ALL LUTHERANS NEED TO CONVERT FOR SALVATION
FEENEYISM IS IN ACCORD WITH MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS
WIKIPEDIA TELLS CATHOLICS WHAT IS HERESY FOR THEM AND THE VATICAN NOR THE SSPX ISSUES A CORRECTION
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment