There is still no denial from the United States Catholic Conference of Bishops (USCCB) of a heretical and objective error they make in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
It was said in a previous post on this blog that extra ecclesiam nulla salus is central to our understanding and interpretation of Vatican Council II.
1. If it is assumed that all salvation mentioned in Vatican Council II is invisible for us and visible only for God then NA 2, UR 3, LG 8,LG 16 do not contradict the literal interpretation of the dogma according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.Archbishop Thomas Edward Gullickson understands this.He knows that it is common sense.Deceased people in Heaven cannot be explicit exceptions on earth to all needing faith and baptism to avoid Hell and go to Heaven.
2. If it is assumed that these cases are visible for us in real life; we can see the deceased-saved in invincible ignorance in 2014, then Vatican Council II is a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Tradition in general.This interpretation is irrational and is the one being used by the USCCB and the American bishops.It is common in the dioceses.It's also heretical. Since it changes the meaning of parts of the Nicene Creed.It denies a defined dogma.
So whenever there are references to Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church by the USCCB media,it must be noted, that they are using the irrational interpretation. They assume that the dead-saved in invincible ignorance are physically visible to us and so are exceptions to Tradition. They also contradict Archbishop Gullickson, Catholic priests and lay apologists who interpret Vatican Council II as not being ambigous but traditional.
It was said in a previous post on this blog that extra ecclesiam nulla salus is central to our understanding and interpretation of Vatican Council II.
1. If it is assumed that all salvation mentioned in Vatican Council II is invisible for us and visible only for God then NA 2, UR 3, LG 8,LG 16 do not contradict the literal interpretation of the dogma according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.Archbishop Thomas Edward Gullickson understands this.He knows that it is common sense.Deceased people in Heaven cannot be explicit exceptions on earth to all needing faith and baptism to avoid Hell and go to Heaven.
2. If it is assumed that these cases are visible for us in real life; we can see the deceased-saved in invincible ignorance in 2014, then Vatican Council II is a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Tradition in general.This interpretation is irrational and is the one being used by the USCCB and the American bishops.It is common in the dioceses.It's also heretical. Since it changes the meaning of parts of the Nicene Creed.It denies a defined dogma.
So whenever there are references to Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church by the USCCB media,it must be noted, that they are using the irrational interpretation. They assume that the dead-saved in invincible ignorance are physically visible to us and so are exceptions to Tradition. They also contradict Archbishop Gullickson, Catholic priests and lay apologists who interpret Vatican Council II as not being ambigous but traditional.
The USCCB in response to these blog posts has not denied that they are using an irrationality in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. While traditionalists do not criticize the USCCB since they are making the same error .They include Robert Sungenis,Roberto de Mattei, Dr.John Rao, Christopher Ferrara, Fr.Nicholas Gruner etc.
These traditionalists will affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus based on Scripture and the traditional magisterium only. They will reject extra ecclesiam nulla salus theologically. Since in theology they accept that the Holy Office 1949 inferring that the baptism of desire is an explicit exception to the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.It is based on a false premise that they have created a theology.The new theology has as its basis an irrationality.The Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake which is being repeated by the USCCB and the traditionalists.-Lionel Andrades
Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson says Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/archbishop-thomas-egullickson-says.html#links
Thursday, July 17, 2014
NO DENIAL FROM THE USCCB: IRRATIONALITY BEING USED IN ALL THE U.S DIOCESES IN THE INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II AND THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/no-denial-from-usccb-irrationality.html#links
July 15, 2014
USCCB Secretariate for Divine Worship statement is heresy
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/usccb-secretariate-for-divine-worship.html#links
USCCB Secretariate for Divine Worship statement is heresy
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/usccb-secretariate-for-divine-worship.html#links
CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS CONTRADICT USCCB DIVINE WORSHIP SECRETARIATE
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/catholic-religious-contradict-usccb.html#links
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/catholic-religious-contradict-usccb.html#links
June 21, 2014
Catholic Religious indicate the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made a factual mistake :implicit desire etc is not visible to us
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/catholic-religious-indicate-letter-of.html#links
Catholic Religious contradict most Catholic priests and nuns : Nostra Aetate is not an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/catholic-religious-contradict-most.html#links
Catholic religious contradict Bishop Fellay : Nostra Aetate is not an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salushttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/catholic-religious-contradict-bishop.html#links
Catholic Religious indicate the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made a factual mistake :implicit desire etc is not visible to us
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/catholic-religious-indicate-letter-of.html#links
Catholic Religious contradict most Catholic priests and nuns : Nostra Aetate is not an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/catholic-religious-contradict-most.html#links
Catholic religious contradict Bishop Fellay : Nostra Aetate is not an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salushttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/catholic-religious-contradict-bishop.html#links
No comments:
Post a Comment