Franciscans of the Immaculate officially being forced to accept heresy

 All salvation referred to in Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 is 

 IMPLICIT, THEORETICAL, INVISIBLE, DEJURE(ACCEPTED IN PRINCIPLE ONLY),SUBJECTIVE FOR US, NOW IN HEAVEN 

 and not

 EXPLICIT, PRACTICALLY KNOWN, VISIBLE,DEFACTO(known in reality),OBJECTIVE, ON EARTH (as compared to Heaven) and REAL (as opposed to hypothetical).

 

1.

IRRATIONALITY

For the cardinals of the Congregatiion for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and for  Cardinal Braz de Aviz, Prefect of the Congregation for Religious, Vatican and Fr.Fidenzio Volpi OFM Cap., the Apostolic Commissar to the Franciscans of the Immaculate  ( imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3), seeds of the Word (AG 11), saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16 etc) are  EXPLICIT, PRACTICALLY KNOWN, VISIBLE, DEFACTO(known in reality),OBJECTIVE, ON EARTH (as compared to Heaven) and REAL (as opposed to hypothetical).

 

So this is an objective mistake, It is an irrational position.It is this irrationality that all the Catholic religious communities have to accept and not just the Franciscans of the Immaculate.

 

2.

HERESY

The irrationality leads to heresy. Since it is  assumed there are defacto, known, visible in the flesh in 2014, exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So the Vatican Curia,  is denying this defined dogma on exclusive salvation ( Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441) and the Nicene Creed 'I believe in one baptism for the forgivess of sin'. This is a first class heresy.

It is with this heresy that the Congregation for Religious want the Franciscans of the Immaculate to accept Vatican Council II.

It is heresy to say that there are known cases saved with the baptism of desire or the baptism of blood in 2014. We don't know of any such case.It is implied wrongly that the baptism of water is not needed for every one in 2014 for salvation.

Since there are 'known' exceptions in 2014 they are also denying extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

 

 

I accept Vatican Council II. I accept the possibility of being saved in invincible ignorance etc. They are accepted in theory. They are  hypothetical and implicit for us. I deny that being saved in invincible ignorance etc are defacto known to us  in personal cases in 2014,. They are not  explicit and objectively verifiable. The Franciscans of the Immaculate and all Catholic religious communities can do the same.

-Lionel Andrades

Which of the two interpretations do you think is being used by the magisterium ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/01/which-of-two-interpretations-do-you.html#links

Salvation outside the Catholic Church: What do we know about it – for certain?
http://douglawrence.wordpress.com/2014/01/18/salvation-outside-the-catholic-church-what-do-we-know-about-it-for-certain/