1. If you say Vatican Council II does contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors it means you consider all salvation, referred to in Vatican Council II as being visible to us, explicit on earth and Heaven. It is true the Council does contradict the dogma.
2.If you say Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors it means you consider all salvation, referred to in Vatican Council II as being invisible to us, on earth.They are hypothetical cases, possibilities, known only to God. It is true Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma.
Either way it depends not on Vatican Council II but if you consider all salvation referred to in the Council as being visible or invisible, explicit or implicit.
Which of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II is rational?
Which of the two interpretations do you think is being used by the magisterium, the Vatican Curia?
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment