Wednesday, November 21, 2012

They excommunicated the SSPX once unaware of the false premise they could do it a second time not knowing that without a precise, false premise being used by all, the Council is traditional

The Society of St.Pius X ( SSPX) has already been excommunicated once when Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) and there was no clarification on the false premise being used in Vatican Council II. Pope Benedict XVI still may not be aware that the Council can be interpreted with the false premise of the dead being visible to us.They could excommunicate the SSPX a second time not knowing that without a precise, false premise being used by all, the Council is traditional.

The CDF Prefect Archbishop Gerhard Muller expects the SSPX to approve Vatican Council II along with the premise of the deceased saved, are visible on earth.The SSPX was already excommunicated once with no clarification from the CDF regarding this error.

No one in the Vatican seems to notice when  Wikipedia (on extra ecclesiam nulla salus) states Lumen Gentium 16 contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Wikipedia and other Internet sources imply that the deceased saved in invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) are known exceptions on earth to every one needing to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation a taught by the dogma over centuries. They expect the SSPX to admit this - that they can meet the dead on the streets who are living exceptions to Tradition.

Encyclopedias, newspapers and the Internet make this common error about the Catholic Faith.The encyclopedias in English at the Angelicum University, Rome imply that the dead are visible and so Vatican Council II contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Due to this error, which makes the Council modernist, the SSPX is rejecting the Council, while unaware of this error the pope and the CDF could excommunicate the SSPX a second time.The SSPX also seem unaware of this issue otherwise their bishops and priests would have made the error- public.-Lionel Andrades




 
ARCHBISHOP,CATHOLIC PRIESTS AND LAY APOLOGIST SAY VATICAN COUNCIL II DOES NOT CONTRADICT THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS AND THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS : "We don't know any case of the baptism of desire or invincible ignorance.Only Jesus can judge"

Archbshop Thomas E.Gullickson has said that the Society of St.Pius X must know that adherence to Vatican Council II and the Catechism does not put them at odds with Tradition.

Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson says Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors

WE DO NOT KNOW ANYONE SAVED WITH THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE OR INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE SO EVERYONE NEEDS TO ENTER THE CHURCH AS DON BOSCO TAUGHT- Salesian Rector and Parish priest in Rome

VATICAN COUNCIL II AFFIRMS CANTATE DOMINO, COUNCIL OF FLORENCE ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS- Fr. Davide Carbonaro

Its a mortal sin to deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It is a sacrilege to receive the Eucharist in this condition- Fr. Gabrielle, priest of the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate

THERE IS NO BAPTISM OF DESIRE THAT WE CAN KNOW OF- Fr.George Puthoor

THERE IS NO DE FACTO BAPTISM OF DESIRE THAT WE KNOW OF-Fr. Masimilliano dei Gaspari F. I

MONS.IGNACIO BARREIRO CARAMBULA, INTERIM PRESIDENT,HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL,USA SAYS "We don't know any case of the baptism of desire or invincible ignorance.Only Jesus can judge"

FR.TULLIO ROTONDO AFFIRMS CANTATE DOMINO, COUNCIL OF FLORENCE ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS

REDEMPTORIST PRIEST SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II DOES NOT CONTRADICT ITSELF NOR THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS

Implicit intention, invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) in Vatican Council II do not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus –John Martigioni
Posted by at
Labels:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)