The international conference on the Sacred Liturgy to be held in Rome next year(1) will be marked by heresy . Participants deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Vatican Council II (AG 7) and the Syllabus of Errors.
Cardinal Malcolm Ranjit believes that the Syllabus of Errors no more applies and so he rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus just like Archbishop Di Noia who believes there are exceptions to the dogma in Vatican Council II. (2). Cardinal Raymond Burke has never affirmed the dogma inspite of appeals (3).
They will all offer the Traditional Latin Mass at the conference.
According to the website of the Conference the Bishop of Fréjus-Toulon, France, Monsignor Dominique Rey, has announced a major international conference on the Sacred Liturgy to take place in Rome from June 25-28, 2013.The conference speakers include Cardinals Ranjith and Burke and Archbishop Di Noia.
The Solemn Mass will be offered by the cardinals and the archbishop who are not proclaiming a defined dogma nor endorsing Vatican Council II (AG 7) in agreement with the dogma.
The participants are not affirming the dogma extra eclesiam nulla salus nor Vatican Council II (AG 7) yet they offer the Traditional Latin Mass in the Extraordinary Form. Is there not an impediment in the Traditional Solemn Mass at this conference ?
Do they deny the defined dogma knowingly and then offer the Traditional Latin Mass?
According to Canon Law a religious in public mortal sin is not to offer Holy Mass unless he has received absolution in the Confessional and made public amends to rectify the scandal.Would the cardinal be in mortal sin if he is offering Mass knowing this error ?-Lionel Andardes
1.
2.
How much is a perceived weakening of the dogma extra Ecclesiam nulla salus (no salvation outside the Church) a major part of the problem, as some traditionalists assert? Has today’s understanding of the dogma contradicted its earlier teaching?
I don’t know if you can blame this on the Council so much as the emergence of a theological trend that emphasized the possibility of salvation of non-Christians. But the Church has always affirmed this, and it has never denied it. … [Karl] Rahner had a disastrous effect on this with his “anonymous Christianity.” But the Council does not alter the teaching of the Church.
And yet they argue it does?
This is a very good example of two of the things we’ve mentioned: the danger of reading this as it’s been read by Rahner, instead of in the light of the whole Tradition.
They claim that salvation is hardly proclaimed anymore.
Ralph Martin agrees with that. We do have a crisis, because the Church has been infected with the idea that we don’t have to worry or be anxious or we don’t sufficiently take the mandate to proclaim Christ seriously. But it’s not because of Vatican II, but bad theology. That’s why Dominus Iesus was part of the response to all of that theology of religion. There is no question that the necessity of extra Ecclesiam nulla salus has a long history. But they were talking about heretics, not nonbelievers. That formula addresses the problems of heresies. It has its history.
The Council did say there are elements of grace in other religions, and I don’t think that should be retracted. I’ve seen them, I know them — I’ve met Lutherans and Anglicans who are saints.07/01/2012
(Emphasis added: Noted the archbishop is saying that we know people who are saved with elements of grace in other religions for them to be explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.It's only if these cases are known that they can be exceptions to the tradiitonal teaching.-L.A)
3.CANON 915 ALSO APPLIES TO CARDINAL RAYMOND BURKE
CARDINAL RAYMOND BURKE A PARTY TO HERESY?
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment