According to Rorate Caeli at 11:00 AM on Sept 22 the Traditional Solemn Mass will be celebrated by His Eminence the Most Reverend Raymond Leo Card. Burke, Prefect of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, attending will be His Excellency the Most Reverend Mons. Simone Giusti, bishop of Leghorn. The liturgical service is assured by the Institute Christ the King Sovereign Priest traditionalist community.
If he endorsed the dogma in public he would be saying that non Catholic religions are not paths to salvation (CDF,Dupuis 2001) and all their members need to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell (Dominus Iesus 20, AG 7, CCC 845,846 etc).
Does he deny the defined dogma knowingly and then he offers the Pontifical Traditional Latin Mass?
According to Canon Law a religious in public mortal sin is not to offer Holy Mass unless he has received absolution in the Confessional and made public amends to rectify the scandal.Would the cardinal be in mortal sin if he is offering Mass knowing this error ?
In the Year of the Faith Vatican Council II must be discussed in harmony with the dogma on salvation and without the Cushing Error of being able to see the dead, saved in invincible ignorance etc, who are supposed to be exceptions to the literal interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
In the Year of the Faith the Prefect of the Supreme Tribunal could ask Cardinal Sean O Malley two questions(1) , (which he refuses to answer) and also answer them himself.Cardinal Sean O Malley, the Archbishop of Boston gives the Eucharist to pro abortion politicians and the pope will not apply Canon 915 to him. The Boston Archbishop will also not affirm the dogma or Vatican Council II (AG 7).Neither will he do justice to the Fr.Leonard Feeney case of Boston. The priest is still condemned for rejecting the baptism of desire, among people who are ghosts,allegedly alive, and who are 'known' exceptions to the interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney.
A few years back I went to Cardinal Burke's office in Rome and left some reports for him to read. I also faxed his office later.There was no response.Neither has there been any response to posts on this blog which refer to him.
The cardinal has welcomed the SSPX reconciliation. Why has the Society of St.Pius X ( SSPX ) to believe that Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma on salvation, when it does not ? We do not know any exception to the dogma in 2012 or the last 100 or more years.
The cardinal has reportedly said that the LCWR sisters should reform or be suppressed. If Bishop Blair is not willing to answer the two questions and affirm the dogma how can he expect the LCWR Sisters not to go into reincarnation and New Age.Do I have to appeal to the LCWR to ask the cardinals the two questions?
The issue still is: is their an impediment in the Traditional Latin Mass ?
There is no response from Ecclesia Dei or the Una Voce Federation.
-Lionel Andrades
1.
1) Do we personally know the dead saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc ?
2) Since we do not know any of these cases, there are no known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ?
IMPEDIMENT IN THE TRADITIONAL LATIN MASS?
IMPEDIMENT IN THE TRADITIONAL LATIN MASS?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/impediment-in-traditional-latin-mass.html#links
When they interpret Vatican Council II according to Cushingism and not Fr. Leonard Feeney it has its influence on the liturgy
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/when-they-interpret-vatican-council-ii.html
NUMBER OF PRIESTS NOT ANSWERING THE TWO QUESTIONS INCREASES
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/number-of-priests-not-answering-two.html#links
NO PRESS STATEMENT AND ANNOUNCEMENT YET FROM BOSTON ARCHDIOCESE ON AGREEMENT WITH FR.LEONARD FEENEY http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/no-press-statement-and-announcement-yet.html#links
SSPX TO WORK UNDER ‘SPOTTER’ BISHOPS IN BOSTON ETC IT IS NECESSARY TO CLARFIY THAT WE CANNOT SEE THE DEAD http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/sspx-to-work-under-spotter-bishops-in.html
SSPX CAN ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS ACCORDING TO FR.LEONARD FEENEY AND NOT RICHARD CUSHING
Vatican Council II says outside the Church there is no salvation and is in agreement with the Syllabus of Errors, Mystici Corporis,Quanto Conficiamus etc.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/sspx-can-accept-vatican-council-ii-in.html
SSPX TO WORK UNDER ‘SPOTTER’ BISHOPS IN BOSTON ETC IT IS NECESSARY TO CLARFIY THAT WE CANNOT SEE THE DEAD http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/sspx-to-work-under-spotter-bishops-in.html
SSPX CAN ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS ACCORDING TO FR.LEONARD FEENEY AND NOT RICHARD CUSHING
Vatican Council II says outside the Church there is no salvation and is in agreement with the Syllabus of Errors, Mystici Corporis,Quanto Conficiamus etc.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/sspx-can-accept-vatican-council-ii-in.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment