Thursday, May 24, 2018

Bishops accuse BBC of ‘bigotry’ after Rees-Mogg interview

They condemned an interview where the Catholic politician was repeatedly questioned on his faith
Two bishops have strongly criticised the BBC after a presenter asked Conservative MP Jacob Rees-Mogg whether his Catholic faith could be a bar to holding high office in Britain.
The bishops of Shrewsbury and Paisley accused the BBC of “bigotry” towards Catholicism following Rees-Mogg’s appearance on The Daily Politics, during which presenter Jo Coburn quizzed the MP on his religious and social views.
Rees-Mogg himself accused Coburn of “picking on the views of the Catholic Church” after she asked him whether his Catholic views meant he had a problem with Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson being a lesbian and pregnant.

The Conservative MP said during the interview: “I make no criticism of any of my colleagues, but do you believe in religious tolerance?”
He continued: “So why do you pick on this view of the Catholic Church? I am asking you, why do you pick on the views of the Catholic Church?”
Coburn responded: “I am saying there are people who might have a problem with it,” to which Rees-Mogg answered: “You are saying that tolerance only goes so far and you should not be tolerant of the teaching of the Catholic Church, so isn’t this stretching into religious bigotry?”
The presenter asked him if he thought his faith was a barrier to holding high office, prompting the Catholic politician to respond: “Ah, that is a different question and it is really important to get to the heart of this because this country believes in religious tolerance, we are a very tolerant nation.
“The act of tolerance is to tolerate things you do not agree with not just ones you do agree with and the problem with liberal tolerance is it has got to the point of only tolerating what it likes.”
Bishop Mark Davies of Shrewsbury condemned the way the interview was conducted. He told the Catholic Herald: “The hounding of a Member of Parliament like Jacob Rees-Mogg for simply sharing the faith of Catholic Church indicates that the BBC and its interviewers see Catholic teaching as being somehow beyond public tolerance. It is hard to see this treatment of Catholic politicians as being other than a new bigotry.”
Bishop John Keenan of Paisley also accused the presenter of trying to “hide behind the old red-herrings of ‘other people say’, and ‘members of your own party say’.”
He added: “When that particular trick wasn’t working, she had to lay her cards on the table and put to him the notion – as a serious question, can you believe! – that being a practicing Catholic should be a barrier to high public office.
“In short, that Catholics like Rees-Mogg simply can’t be Prime Minister because it’s just not British in this day and age. She openly wondered if it was a ‘problem’ to hold ordinary Catholic beliefs in high office, and seriously suggested that Catholics who were against the likes of abortion and same-sex marriage should be barred from decision-making in public life.
“Rees-Mogg was quite right to call this secular bigotry. What else is it?”
Bishop Keenan told the Herald that Rees-Mogg was right to “point out that this aggressive secularism has nothing liberal about it”.
The bishop added: “He was right to call out the BBC for picking on the Catholic Church particularly, and to signal that it would not treat Muslims or Jews in anything like the same prejudicial way in which it now routinely and casually treats Catholics.”
Last month, Bishop Keenan complained to BBC Scotland over a video that said Communion “tastes like cardboard and smells like hate”.
“Jo Coburn asked, in the end, if you can divorce your personal views from your politics,” the bishop said. “It is clear that there are elements in the BBC who find it quite impossible to make such a separation, and who find it quite acceptable to bring their own personal animus against the Catholic Church to the front and centre of their work, in an aggressive propaganda that runs ‘Pro-Choice-LGBT good, Catholics bad’.
“They peddle this idea without a care for its compromising effect on the best values of their own public service broadcasting mission. In that sense it is not just the Catholic Church that they offend but their own founding values of balance and fairness.”
He added: “I wonder, when the dust settles and this era moves on, if the BBC will be able to emerge with any reputation in tact from having so boldly pinned its colours to the mast of a present but surely time-limited ideology whose worrying and deleterious effects on tolerance and on the common good are becoming plainer to see by the day.”
Rees-Mogg’s Conservative colleague Sir Edward Leigh MP said: “BBC presenters often treat observant religious people in general and Catholics in particular as if they’re not of the modern world. It speaks to the strengths of the Conservative party that people as ostensibly different as Jacob Rees-Mogg and Ruth Davidson get on well in the same party. Actually, I think all the people of this country get on much better than the BBC would really like them to.”
The BBC said: “Jacob Rees Mogg is viewed by many as a potential future leader of the Conservative Party and possible future prime minister. Jo Coburn did not question his right to be a practising Catholic in public life, and did not raise his Catholicism, but used the interview to explore whether Mr Rees Mogg’s views on gay marriage and abortion were out of step with the mainstream of his colleagues at Westminster.
“Both the current and last prime minister have backed gay marriage, and argued for the abortion laws in Great Britain to remain largely unchanged.
“Jo also referred directly to several Conservative MPs who have said they believe Mr Rees Mogg’s views on the issues of gay marriage and abortion to be incompatible with leading the party, and it was not unreasonable to ask him to respond to those claims.”
http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2018/05/23/bishops-accuse-bbc-of-bigotry-after-rees-mogg-interview/

Cardinal Raymond Burke has set an example for Catholics in general and traditionalists in particular since he has affirmed what I call Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and rejected Vatican Council II (Cushingite).

Cardinal Raymond Burke has set an example for Catholics in general and traditionalists in particular since he has affirmed what I call Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and rejected Vatican Council II (Cushingite). Now he must ask the present two popes and the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to the do the same.
Image result for Photo of Cardinal Burke Voice of the Family COnference
He set a new example for Catholics by affirming traditional extra ecclesiam null salus(EENS -Feeneyite) and rejecting EENS( Cushingite).
Then with EENS (Feeneyite) he has accepted only Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite). This is why he can affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus , with no known exceptions of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance.They can only be accepted as  hypothetical cases which can be known only to God.Similarly he can affirm Vatican Council II, along with EENS, since he has rejected Vatican Council II (Cushingite). Since he is at home with EENS according to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century and the ecclesiology of the Latin Mass of that time, an off shoot of this, is proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King, the non separation of Church and State, traditional mission knowing all non Catholics are oriented to Hell without membership in the Catholic Church and an ecumenism of return. All this  comes with the exclusivist ecclesiology which Cardinal Burke has not rejected with Vatican Council II.
So this is a new precedent for the Society of St.Pius X( SSPX) and all other religious communities in the Catholic Church.Since presently they know only of Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) which definitely is a rupture with Tradition.This is also the only Vatican Council II known to the liberals.They were limited by the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS.
So the SSPX would affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King but reject Vatican Council (C).
The liberals would affirm Vatican Council II (C) but reject the Social Reign of Christ the King.
The traditionalists at the St. Benedict Centers would affirm EENS ( Feeneyite) but reject Vatican Council II ( C) since it is an obvious rupture with EENS(Feeneyite).
Now Cardinal Burke is affirming Vatican Council II(F), EENS(F) and the Social Reign of Christ. This is unprecedented.Presently I am the only person who is doing this.I do not interpret Vatican Council II like the traditionalists and nor  like the liberals.
For me there can only be a hermeneutic of continuity if Vatican Council II is interpreted without the false premise. I call this interpretation of the Council, Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and it ends the doctrinal confusion in the Catholic Church.
With Vatican Council II (F) the past ecclesiology of the Church is the same until today and so there is no rupture with the Syllabus of Errors.For Pope Benedict Vatican Council II was a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors  and EENS, since he only know of Vatican Council II (C).With Vatican Council II (F) he cannot have 'a development'.
So Cardinal Burke has now boldly said that other religions are false.This is an indication that he affirms the Syllabus of Errors, he affirms the past exclusivist ecclesiology and he could only be using Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).-Lionel Andrades

Cardinal Burke has affirmed the exclusive understanding of salvation and also Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) : it supports the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King




AKA Catholic





Cardinal Burke contradicts Council, Benedict!


Cardinal_Burke_Roma_Life_Forum_2016_810_500_55_s_c1
At the Rome Life Forum last weekend, Cardinal Raymond Burke urged Catholics to submit to the reign of Christ the King.

At present, unfortunately, the full text of the address appears unavailable, however, excerpts have been provided in several articles posted at LifeSite News.
According to those reports, Cardinal Burke stated:
The Kingship of Christ is, by nature, universal, that is, it extends to all men, to the whole world. It is not a kingship over only the faithful or over only the things of the Church, but over all men and all of their affairs.
Bravo!
In this, Cardinal Burke is simply stating, at least in part, the traditional (and, incidentally, immutable) doctrine of the Church concerning the Social Kingship of Christ as articulated very clearly in the Encyclical of Pope Pius XI, Quas Primas, and elsewhere.
Cardinal Burke went on:
The kingship is exercised from the Heart of Christ in human hearts. It does not pretend to govern directly the world but to govern it through man.
OK… we’re still on Catholic ground, although one senses a tremor…
Lionel: No tremor. The Kingship from the Heart of Christ is expressed through man.It is expressed  where and when it  is possible, to govern through man directly.Or it is expressed  implicitly in our heart.
_____________________
He continued:
Christians who do not pretend to govern the civil state by means of the Church at the same time are called to give an heroic public witness to the truth of the moral law, of the law of God. Thus, Christ’s Kingship is exercised by hearts one with His Royal Heart.
At this, the ground is not only rumbling, it is beginning to crumble.
Cardinal Burke seems to be suggesting that it is ill-advised for those who exercise civil authority to do so “by means of the Church;” as if for them “heroic public witness” is somehow limited to their personal life and does not extend to how they govern.
Lionel: I don't think he is saying that. He means that the Kingship is expressed explicitly when the government supports the Social Reign of Christ the King or in individual and private cases when it is expressed personally.
______________________
In reality, those who govern are obligated to do so by means of the Church!
Why?
Simple, as Cardinal Burke stated previously, the Kingship of Christ extends over all men and all of their affairs, and it is through the Holy Catholic Church alone that He speaks and thus guides the affairs of men – yes, even the affairs of State.
Lionel: Yes those who govern or have the possibility to do so, are obligated.The majority of Catholics do not have this opportunity and so are not obligated.It does not apply to them.
____________________
As Pope Leo XIII taught:
All men are bound absolutely to worship God in that way which He has shown to be His will. It is, therefore, the bounden duty of rulers of State to favor the one true religion, to protect it, to shield it under the credit and sanction of the laws, and neither to organize nor enact any measure that may compromise its safety. (cf Immortale Dei – 6)
Needless to say, it is impossible for those who govern to uphold this sacred duty apart from availing themselves of, and heeding, that which only the Holy Catholic Church can provide; i.e., by means of the Church.
Lionel: So Cardinal Burke has said that this is how it should be.
___________________
Given that Cardinal Burke is most certainly a man-of-the-council, it would seem too much for us to expect him to proclaim the Church’s doctrine on the Social Kingship of Christ in its fullness, as this would require him to denounce as irreconcilable with immutable Catholic tradition the text of Dignitatis Humanae – the Declaration on Religious Liberty of Vatican II.
Lionel: Not necessarily. He has already proclaimed the Social Kingship of Christ in its fullness.Dignitatis Humanae does not contradict what he says. It depends how one chooses to  interpret Vatican Council II.
__________________
It would also force him to denounce the Constitution of the United States, as he himself approvingly noted at the Church Teaches Forum, in Louisville, KY on July 16, 2016:
Religious liberty thus understood [in the text of Dignitatits Humane] has been protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
In a follow-up report from LifeSite News, Cardinal Burke is also quoted as saying at the Rome Life Forum:
‘Freedom of religion’ does not mean the freedom to practice a religion which is false or a religion which contradicts the law of God.
Amen to that!
The freedom to practice a false religion, however, is precisely that which the Second Vatican Council insists upon as a civil right in Dignitatis Humanae.
Lionel: It is referring to a secular state.It is mentioned in one of the footnotes. 
Cardinal Burke is proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King as an ideal now and a possible reality in a Catholic State.It is a communication with God in our heart.It is spiritual and does not have to always be seen in a political context.
_______________________
It states that this so-called “right” extends even to those “who do not live up to their obligation of seeking the truth and adhering to it and the exercise of this right is not to be impeded, provided that just public order be observed.” (cf DH 2)
Lionel: DH never was an impediment. It never was an impediment for me.Also in past reports over the years, it was not an impediment for Louie Verrecchio and Fr. Brian Harrison.
_______________________
Do not be fooled by the caveat concerning “just public order.” The Council has left it to the State to determine what justice in the public order entails, and we know all too well how that is going.
The bottom line is simply this – the Council plainly teaches that man has a positive right to practice false religion; a right founded in the very dignity of the human person as made known by Divine revelation. (ibid.)
Lionel: In a secular state this is a defacto reality.Also at the time of the papal states, non Catholics were free to follow their religion with  some limits.
________________________
So, Cardinal Burke, whether he knows it or not, has placed himself at odds with the Council.
Lionel: Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) supports him.Vatican Council II (Cushingite) is a rupture with Tradition. 
Vatican Council II (Cushingite) seems to be contradicted by Cardinal Burke and this is a good sign. May be the SSPX can now review their policy on Vatican Council II. Cardinal Burke is showing them that they can affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) along with proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King and also the traditional exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church. The Counciil ( F) is not a rupture with Tradition as it is for the SSPX and Louie Verrecchio.
_______________________
He has also placed himself at odds with Benedict the Abdicator, who in a reflection published in the October 10, 2012 editon of L’Osservatore Romano wrote of the Council’s deliberations on religious liberty:
At stake was the freedom to choose and practice religion, and the freedom to change it, as fundamental human rights and freedoms.
Lionel: Pope Benedict was a Cushingite and would interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise, as does Louie Verrecchio and the SSPX.
___________________
As the Church has always taught, no such right exists. Period. Such evil as false religion can at best be tolerated.
In conclusion, Cardinal Burke will no doubt receive uncritical applause from the usual cast of characters (some of them con-trads) for the true statements he made with respect to the Kingship of Christ and religious freedom; thereby leading the foolish to look up to him as a trustworthy voice for the true Faith.
Lionel: He has also affirmed the exclusive understanding of salvation without rejecting Vatican Council II.
____________________
In this sense, he is perhaps even more dangerous than the Walter Kaspers of the world.
You see, unless and until Cardinal Burke ceases casting his lot with the modernists, defending Vatican II and all that goes with it, his flirtations with tradition will ultimately only contribute to a continuation of the current ecclesial crisis and the loss of countless more souls.
Lionel: In a way he has broken away from the error of the liberals and traditionalists.He has shown how Vatican Council II (LG 8- subsists it in ) can be reconciled with extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the past ecclesiology upon which was based the Syllabus of Errors.This is a breakthrough.
________________________________
Pray for Cardinal Burke. It appears that he is a man wildly conflicted and terribly disoriented, but one who still seems to hear at least the whisper of tradition.
Lionel: I think Louie Verrecchio is disoriented he knows ( or does not want to know) that with or without an irrational premise, there can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II .He cannot adapt to this reality and admit that he was wrong all these years and so was Fr.Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari...-Lionel Andrades

https://akacatholic.com/cardinal-burke-contradicts-council-benedict/

The Rich Man and Lazarus In English Full Movie (HD)




Gospel reading today Thursday 

MK 9:41-50

Jesus said to his disciples:
"Anyone who gives you a cup of water to drink
because you belong to Christ,
amen, I say to you, will surely not lose his reward.

"Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, 
it would be better for him if a great millstone
were put around his neck
and he were thrown into the sea.
If your hand causes you to sin, cut it off.
It is better for you to enter into life maimed 
than with two hands to go into Gehenna,
into the unquenchable fire.
And if your foot causes you to sin, cut if off.
It is better for you to enter into life crippled 
than with two feet to be thrown into Gehenna.
And if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out.
Better for you to enter into the Kingdom of God with one eye
than with two eyes to be thrown into Gehenna,
where 
their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched.
"Everyone will be salted with fire.
Salt is good, but if salt becomes insipid,
with what will you restore its flavor?
Keep salt in yourselves and you will have peace with one another."

https://youtu.be/c_cmonQPXe0

Reading at Mass today : Come Now, You Rich, Weep And Wail Over Your Impending Miseries.

Thursday of the Seventh Week in Ordinary Time
Lectionary: 344


Reading 1

JAS 5:1-6

Come now, you rich, weep and wail over your impending miseries.

Your wealth has rotted away, your clothes have become moth-eaten,
your gold and silver have corroded,
and that corrosion will be a testimony against you;
it will devour your flesh like a fire.
You have stored up treasure for the last days.
Behold, the wages you withheld from the workers
who harvested your fields are crying aloud;
and the cries of the harvesters
have reached the ears of the Lord of hosts.
You have lived on earth in luxury and pleasure;
you have fattened your hearts for the day of slaughter.
You have condemned;
you have murdered the righteous one;
he offers you no resistance.

The Rich Man and Lazarus In English Full Movie (HD)

https://youtu.be/R-rY5XnFn1k


Hundreds visit Hobbs church to witness ‘crying' : Our Lady of Guadalupe statue



By: 
  • Elena Mendoza  
  • Updated: May 23, 2018 11:30 AM MDT



    HOBBS, N.M., (KRQE) - Some are calling it a miracle. People are coming from all over to visit a Hobbs church after hearing its Our Lady of Guadalupe statue started to cry during mass Sunday.
    "It is a miracle, nothing short of a miracle,” said Paul Campos, who attends Lady of Guadalupe Catholic Church.
    Worshippers from across New Mexico and Texas are driving to see what many believe to be an act of God.
    "We immediately came, we had to see this for ourselves,” said Alice Rivas, from Denver City, Texas.
    Rivas heard about it on social media. She drove 40 minutes for the opportunity to just to touch the statue and pray before it.
    “You just get all jittery. I mean, you – you could just cry. I couldn't help but just tears,” said Rivas.
    “You're never too prepared for something like this,” said Rev. Jose Segura with the help of a translator. “He wanted to call the bishop from Las Cruces right away to see what he needs to do because he's never encountered anything like this."
    Father Jose Segura says parishioners noticed them after Sunday's noon mass.
    “He noticed that a lot of people were coming up to Our Lady and started touching her. That's when everybody started noticing she was weeping."
    Father Segura believes she's crying because of all of the recent violence in the United States and around the world.
    "You can even get a sense of her presence. You can smell roses in her tears. I've got a tissue that I've taken, wiped from her mantle,” said Campos.
    The faithful who witnessed it say it's nothing short of a miracle.
    "I actually saw how she was dripping, and that's when I took the video and it's just incredible,” said Marcelo Servin, who’s attended the church for about 10 years.
    Servin, who has cancer and lupus, also believes the virgin has healing powers.
    "Ever since I got here, for some reason, I've been feeling good. I've been out of bed doing stuff around the house,” said Servin.
    The father says the statue was built in Mexico and was on loan to this church. They will now try to keep it permanently.
    The Archdiocese of Las Cruces has been called in to investigate. He says the church treats their investigation in a very scientific way.
    Those at the church say at one point, the "supposed" tears were soaked up with cotton balls and preserved as part of that investigation.

    Cardinal Raymond Burke contradicts Cardinal Luiz Ladaria's heretical statement : interprets Lumen Gentium 8 rationally and traditionally


    Cardinal Raymond Burke on May 18,2018 contradicted Cardinal Luiz Ladaria's heretical statement of March 1,2018 with a rational and traditional interpretation of Lumen Gentium 8, Vatican Council II.
    Image result for Photo of Cardinal Burke Voice of the Family COnference
    Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican at the Press Conference for Placuit Deo was asked if the Church still understood that it had an exclusiveness and superiority in salvation.Cardinal Ladaria's answer was in the negative.He cited Lumen Gentium 8 ( subsists it in ) as an exception to the past exclusivist ecclesiologty and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.





    Cardinal Raymond Burke at the Voice of the Family Conference also cited  Lumen Gentium 8 and said that the one  true Church of Christ subsists in only the Catholic and Apostolic Church.He called for mission and evangelisation, the proclamation of Christ as King of all areas of life and of all people, the rejection of false religions and secular pluralism,not bowing down to political ideologies and systems,acknowledging that the whole of mankind is subject to Jesus Christ and called for a return to 'real Christianity'.
    Cardinal Ladaria was irrational with his Cushingite theology since there are no known people in 2018 saved outside the Church, where the one true Church could have existed or exists.So there are no objective examples of salvation outside the Church. A possibility or hypothetical case cannot be an objective exception to the dogma EENS and yet this is the irrational reasoning of the new Prefect of the CDF.
    Since the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to known non Catholics saved outside the Church for Cardinal Ladaria,hypothetical cases are non hypothetical.So in general he interprets Vatican Council II(LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc) as a rupture with traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus.


    Cardinal Burke is not saying that Lumen Gentium 8 refers to a rupture with Tradition. He infers that LG 8 refers to unknown cases in our reality. This is rational and obvious.So he interprets Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of continuity.



    Since March, the Vatican has not denied reports on line and e-mails sent to them, which state that Lumen Gentium 8 is not an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.There has been no denial. However neither has there been a correction or clarification from the CDF.-Lionel Andrades


    MAY 22, 2018
    Cardinal Burke: False religions that permit abortion should be suppressed  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/cardinal-burke-false-religions-that.html
































    JANUARY 27, 2018