Saturday, February 10, 2018

Kiko Arguello and the Neo Catechumenal Way must re consider the Redemptoris Mater seminaries coordinating with the Allen Hall seminary, London.It uses irrational Cushingism to interpret Vatican Council II

Image result for Photo Kiko Arguello and Pope Francis

Kiko  Arguello the founder of the Neo Catechumenal Way must re-consider his Redemptoris Mater seminaries coordinating with the Allen Hall Catholic seminary, London.It uses irrational Cushingism theology to re-interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition.It does the same with other magisterial documents.There is no denial from them.
Image result for Photo Kiko Arguello and Pope Francis
Their interpretation of Vatican Council II is a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church and the Syllabus of Errors.They choose the hermeneutic of rupture and reject the hermeneutic of continuity.
-Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 10, 2018


No denial from Rector of Allen Hall, Catholic seminary,London : interprets LG 16 as a rupture with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/no-denial-from-rector-of-allen-hall.html



FEBRUARY 8, 2018



The New Theology of Rahner, Ratzinger and Ladaria has been accepted by the Catholic Charismatic Renewal, Neo Cathechumenal Way, traditionalists and all the religious communities.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/the-new-theology-of-rahner-ratzinger.html



FEBRUARY 6, 2018

Image result for Photo Kiko Arguello and Pope Francis

Cushingism is the only theology used by the Catholic Charismatic Renewal Movement and the Neo Catechumenal Way : this is not the work of the Holy Spirit.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/cushingism-is-only-theology-used-by.html

How to Save Souls (Youttube) - Gobi

Michael Voris follows Abp.Lefebvre : it's magisterial

As expected Michael Voris will continue to follow Pope Pius XII , Cardinal Ottaviani and Archbishop Lefebvre  in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and so there is a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the Syllabus of Errors. There is a rational choice but it is not the teaching of the present magisterium.
So doctrinally Michael Voris like the two popes, chooses to re-interpret  the Nicene Creed, Vatican Council II,Vatican Council II, the Catechisms  and other magisterial documents.
If he could interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism(according to Lionel Andrades) then doctrinally he would be in harmony  with the past, with Tradition.But then it would not be in harmony with the present, liberal popes and the Left.
So when the Left criticizes CMTV,Michael Voris assumes then that he is following the Magisterium of the church.
The apologetics of CMTV premium programs would be based on Cushingism instead of Feeneyism is a philosophy and theology. This is an innovation in the Church.-Lionel Andrades


FEBRUARY 10, 2018


Popes since Pius XII and Archbishop Lefebvre would be in heresy for the Magisterium in the 16th century

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/popes-since-pius-xii-and-archbishop.html


FEBRUARY 9, 2018


If Michael Voris could accept that Pope Pius XII, Card. Ottaviani and Abp Lefebvre were in heresy while Fr. Leonard Feeney was teaching Catholic orthodoxy then the interpretation of Vatican Council II would change for CMTV.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/if-michael-voris-could-accept-that-pope.html

Medical Doctor sees Hell-HELL is Real. Part 1








Puritan John Bunyan - A Lost Soul Speaks (Christian devotional reading)

Benefits of Meditating on Hell

Popes since Pius XII and Archbishop Lefebvre would be in heresy for the Magisterium in the 16th century

What are you saying?
All of the current Pope's along with Archbishop Lefebvre, Cardinal Ottavanni all the Pope's of Vatican II along with Pope's Pius XII , clergy many distinguished writers and layman are all in HERESY over Bob(Baptism of Blood), Bod(baptism of Desire) and I.I(Invincible Ignorance) and except you are correct?
Lionel:
Cushingism is a heretical philosophy and theology.It changes the interpretation of magisterial documents.
Feeneyism( according to L.A) is the traditional philosophy and theology.When we avoid Cushingism we automatically return to Feeneyism.We do not have to create a new theology or anything new.
For me EENS Feeneyite says the baptism of desire (BOD) etc refer to invsible and unknown people in 2018 and so BOD etc are not relevant or exceptions to the dogma EENS.So I affirm Feeneyite EENS.
For Archbishop Lefebvre and the popes since Pius XII it is EENS(Cushingite). They believe that BOD,BOB and I.I refer to known people saved outside the Church. BOD,BOB and I.I are examples of salvation outside the Church.This is a rupture with the magisterium of the 16th century, for example.This would be heresy for the Magisterium in the 16th century and the Church Councils which defined EENS.
Yet Pope Benedict in March 2016 confirmed his Cushingite view of EENS .This was a heresy of faith and it was manifest in public.
No one else objected since generally they are interpreting Vatican Council II and EENS with Cushingism.
So I affirm Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and they all affirm Vatican Council II(Cushingite).Don't you think one of us is in heresy? Which is the rational, traditional and non heretical interpretation,of EENS and Vatican Council II, for you? Theirs or mine?   -Lionel Andrades

 
February 9, 2018
If Michael Voris could accept that Pope Pius XII, Card. Ottaviani and Abp Lefebvre were in heresy while Fr. Leonard Feeney was teaching Catholic orthodoxy then the interpretation of Vatican Council II would change for CMTV
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/if-michael-voris-could-accept-that-pope.html
 

No denial from Rector of Allen Hall, Catholic seminary,London : interprets LG 16 as a rupture with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors

Fr Roger TaylorThere is is no denial from the Rector of the Allen Hall, Catholic seminary in London.I e-mailed him the report on this blog.1
Unlike me , he interprets Lumen Gentium 16 as referring to known and visible, non Catholics, saved outside the Catholic Church.So LG 16 makes Vatican Council II a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite) the Syllabus of Errors and the past ecclesiology of the Church.
He and the faculty at Allen Hall,in the Archdiocese of Westminister, have a choice.Like me they can interpret LG 16,LG 8,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as referring to theoretical and hypothetical cases in 2018.So they are not exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.They are not exceptions to the past ecumenism of return and no salvation outside the Church according to the missionaries and Magisterium of the  16th century.-Lionel Andrades


1


February 8, 2018
The difference between the Rector of the Allen Hall,London,Catholic seminary and me : LG 16 refers to hypothetical and invisible cases for me but not for him