Cardinal Raymond Burke has set an example for Catholics in general and traditionalists in particular since he has affirmed what I call Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and rejected Vatican Council II (Cushingite).

Cardinal Raymond Burke has set an example for Catholics in general and traditionalists in particular since he has affirmed what I call Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and rejected Vatican Council II (Cushingite). Now he must ask the present two popes and the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to the do the same.

He set a new example for Catholics by affirming traditional extra ecclesiam null salus(EENS -Feeneyite) and rejecting EENS( Cushingite).

Then with EENS (Feeneyite) he has accepted only Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite). This is why he can affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus , with no known exceptions of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance.They can only be accepted as  hypothetical cases which can be known only to God.Similarly he can affirm Vatican Council II, along with EENS, since he has rejected Vatican Council II (Cushingite). Since he is at home with EENS according to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century and the ecclesiology of the Latin Mass of that time, an off shoot of this, is proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King, the non separation of Church and State, traditional mission knowing all non Catholics are oriented to Hell without membership in the Catholic Church and an ecumenism of return. All this  comes with the exclusivist ecclesiology which Cardinal Burke has not rejected with Vatican Council II.

So this is a new precedent for the Society of St.Pius X( SSPX) and all other religious communities in the Catholic Church.Since presently they know only of Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) which definitely is a rupture with Tradition.This is also the only Vatican Council II known to the liberals.They were limited by the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS.

So the SSPX would affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King but reject Vatican Council (C).

The liberals would affirm Vatican Council II (C) but reject the Social Reign of Christ the King.

The traditionalists at the St. Benedict Centers would affirm EENS ( Feeneyite) but reject Vatican Council II ( C) since it is an obvious rupture with EENS(Feeneyite).

Now Cardinal Burke is affirming Vatican Council II(F), EENS(F) and the Social Reign of Christ. This is unprecedented.Presently I am the only person who is doing this.I do not interpret Vatican Council II like the traditionalists and nor  like the liberals.

For me there can only be a hermeneutic of continuity if Vatican Council II is interpreted without the false premise. I call this interpretation of the Council, Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and it ends the doctrinal confusion in the Catholic Church.

With Vatican Council II (F) the past ecclesiology of the Church is the same until today and so there is no rupture with the Syllabus of Errors.For Pope Benedict Vatican Council II was a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors  and EENS, since he only know of Vatican Council II (C).With Vatican Council II (F) he cannot have 'a development'.

So Cardinal Burke has now boldly said that other religions are false.This is an indication that he affirms the Syllabus of Errors, he affirms the past exclusivist ecclesiology and he could only be using Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).-Lionel Andrades