The solution to the doctrinal crisis is the Church announcing that there are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018 and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases

The solution to the doctrinal crisis is the Church announcing that "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases ".

VATICAN COUNCIL II IS NOT A RUPTURE WITH TRADITION

This would mean Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.Since hypothetical cases are not real people in the present times and so cannot be objective exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. So the Magisterium made a mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and then repeated it at Vatican Council II. The mistake is repeated even today.

VATICAN COUNCIL II IS NOT A RUPTURE WITH AN ECUMENISM OF RETURN
So when it is known that "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I  in 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases ", Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.

VATICAN COUNCIL II WOULD NOT CONTRADICT THE TEACHINGS ON THE SOCIAL REIGN OF CHRIST THE KING

Since the old ecclesiology would be intact Vatican Council II would not contradict the teachings on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation. It would be based on no salvation outside the Church.


NOTHING IN VATICAN COUNCIL II TO CONTRADICT THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS

There would be nothing in the Council text to contradict the Syllabus of Errors since "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases ".


THE PRIORITY IS THE NON SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE

With Vatican Council II (AG 7) and the dogma EENS (Council of Florence 1441) indicating all non Catholics today who have died outside the Church are in Hell, the priority must be the non separation of Church and State, for the salvation of souls.

ALL NON CATHOLICS WITHOUT FAITH AND BAPTISM ARE IN HELL ACCORDING TO VATICAN COUNCIL II Vatican Council II (AG 7) would be telling us that all non Catholics  are on the way to Hell without faith and baptism and there are no known exceptions mentioned in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 , GS 22, etc to traditional EENS.Unknown and physically invisible non Catholics cannot be exceptions.

The exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church before and after Vatican Council II would be the same.


SSPX COULD INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II IN HARMONY WITH TRADITION

The SSPX and all religious communities could affirm Vatican Council II, interpreted rationally, since it would be in harmony with the past ecclesiology of an ecumenism of return and outside the Church there is no salvation.Presently there is a rupture since they do not know that  "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I 2018" and " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases ".

CHRISTOLOGY NOT OPPOSED TO EXCLUSIVIST ECCLESIOLOGY

There would be no separation of Jesus from  membership in the Catholic Church for salvation by using the New Theology. There would not be a vague Christology opposed to an exclusivist  ecclesiology.

VATICAN COUNCIL II NO MORE CITES LIBERALS NEW ECUMENISM : FALSE PREMISE HAS TO BE USED

The liberals would no more be able to cite Vatican Council II to affirm the new ecumenism, since there would be no known salvation outside the Church for them.They would have to use the false premise and then they could cite UR 3, LG 8, AG 11, GS 22 etc.The liberals would not be able to call for a New Evangelisation alongside other Christians, joint mission, since outside the Church there is no salvation, according to Vatican Council II.

OTHER CHRISTIANS ARE ORIENTED TO HELL ACCORDING TO THE OLD THEOLOGY NOT CONTRADICTED BY VATICAN COUNCIL II
Other Christians are oriented to Hell according to the Old Theology which is not contradicted by Vatican Council II. All non Catholics are oriented to Hell unless they enter the Church as members and remain within it, according to the Old Theology which avoided the false premise.

INTER FAITH MARRIAGE IS ADULTERY ACCORDING TO EENS WHICH IS NOT CONTRADICTED BY VATICAN COUNCIL II
Catholics who marry non Catholics would be living in adultery since civil marriages are not a Sacrament and the non Catholic spouse is outside the Church and on the way to Hell.

PROFESSION OF FAITH MUST AFFIRM VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EENS

Those who make an Oath of Fidelity or a Profession of Faith or an Oath Against Modernism would have to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, Vatican Council II and the Catechisms interpreted rationally and and also the Nicene Creed interpreted rationally.It would be saying I believe in one baptism of the forgivness of sins, one known baptism and not three known baptisms.

RATIONAL INTERPRETATION OF NICENE CREED
It would be saying I believe in the Holy Catholic Church which teaches outside the Church there is no salvation and nor the possibility of salvation( SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012).
The Nicene  Creed would also be saying I believe in the Holy Spirit which teaches the Catholic today as in centuries past that there are no objective and known cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance.


CDF PREFECTS MUST AFFIRM VATICAN COUNCIL II,. EENS, SYLLABUS OF ERRORS AND OTHER DE FIDE DOCTRINE TO HOLD OFFICE ACCORDING TO CANON LAW
A cardinal cannot be the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith according to Canon Law if he does not affirm Vatican Council II, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors. Similarly if popes make the same error they would be in mortal sin and would have to recant and go for Confession.Lionel Andrades

 APRIL 21, 2018

The St.Benedict Centers need to clarify that there are no practical exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus for us in 2018. No physically visible cases of BOD,BOB and I.I in the past http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/the-stbenedict-centers-need-to-clarify.html

 APRIL 21, 2018

So for every one who is a part of this confusion, it is important for the SBC to clarify that the baptism of water is always needed for justification and salvation (John 3:5, Mark 16:16 etc) and there are no practical exceptions to EENS for us in 2018. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/so-for-every-one-who-is-part-of-this.html

APRIL 21, 2018

Fr.Chad Ripperger and FSSP priests still not permitted by the Vatican to affirm the traditional teaching on salvation : positivism towards magisterialism  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/frchad-ripperger-and-fssp-priests-still.html