Monday, March 19, 2018

Repost : Liberalism based on Cushingite Vatican Council II is obsolete.The average Catholic, the rank and file Catholic is intelligent enough to know what is rational and who is faking it.

MARCH 17, 2018

Liberalism based on Cushingite Vatican Council II is obsolete.The average Catholic, the rank and file Catholic is intelligent enough to know what is rational and who is faking it.








Fr.Leonard Feeney is the key to resolving the doctrinal crisis in the Church over Vatican Council II.If you accept Fr. Feeney as being correct then Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Tradition.Since invisible for us baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are not visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).This is how you would reason.This would be normal.





LG 8,LG 16 NOT EXCEPTIONS TO TRADITIONAL EENS WHEN FEENEYISM IS THE REASONING
So LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 11( seeds of the Word) etc would not be exceptions to traditional EENS.You would simply say that LG 8, LG 16,UR 3 etc like BOD,BOB and I.I are just hypothetical cases.Speculative possibilities accepted with good will but with no connection to EENS.They are not a problem for a Feeneyite Catholic, for whom hypothetical cases are just hypothetical.

VATICAN COUNCIL WITH FEENEYITE REASONING DOES NOT CONTRADICT THE PAST ECCLESIOLOGY OF THE CHURCH
Then Vatican Council II would not contradict the past ecclesiology of the Church upon which there could only be an ecumenism of return.
It was upon the past exclusivist ecclesiology that there was traditional Mission and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King.
So affirming EENS according to Fr. Leonard Feeney and the Magisterium  of the 16th century is important when Catholics have to interpret Vatican Council II. It is the same with the Nicene Creed and all the Catechisms.

MAGISTERIUM NOT ALLOWED TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH FEENEYITE REASONING
Presently the Magisterium is not allowed to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism(hypothetical cases of LG 16 etc are just hypothetical).They have to choose irrational Cushingism( hypothetical cases are objective examples of salvation outside the Church in the present times.LG 16 refers to visible people).However the average educated Catholic is not limited.The rank and file Catholic can go ahead and interpret Vatican Council with Feeneyism( hypothetical cases are just hypothetical and not known examples of salvation outside the Church).This is common sense.One does not have to know theology to realize this.

MAGISTERIUM CONTRADICTS ITSELF FORCED TO USE CUSHINGITE IRRATIONAL REASONING.
The Magisterium however,also has to interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) as if they contradict itself.Catholics blindly follow. Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation and Ad Gentes 7 also suggest that there is the case of the catechumen saved with the baptism of desire.The Catechism says the Church knows of no means to eternal beatitude (CCC1257) but God is not limited to the Sacraments.It is yes and no for the non-discerning Catholic.
So  Vatican Council II and the Catechism can be read with Cushingism( LG 16 contradicts AG 7) or Feeneyism(invisible cases of LG 16 do not contradict AG 7 or EENS).All need the baptism of water in the Catholic Church for salvation and when God is not limited to the Sacraments it is known only to God. So CCC 1257 does not contradict itself when Feeneyism is the reasoning.

CUSHINGISM CREATES POPE BENEDICT'S HERMENEUTIC OF RUPTURE WITH THE PAST
Cushingism creates, what Pope Benedict called, the hermeneutic of rupture with the past.Feeneyism brings a continuity with the past and avoids a schism with the past popes. Ironically Pope Benedict was a Cushingite.
So when you are a Feeneyite you are not in schism with the popes of the past on EENS.When you are a Cushingite you are saying that there is known salvation outside the Church when no one can know of any known salvation outside the Church.

CARDINAL LUIZ LADARIA ESCAPED WITH CUSHINGITE LG 8
At the Press Conference this month on Placuit Deo Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j said Lumen Gentium 8 was an exception to the past exclusivist understanding of salvation in the Church.

POPE BENEDICT GOT AWAY WITH CUSHINGITE VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EENS
In March 2016 Pope  Benedict said EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries of the 16th century.Vatican Council II (Cushingite and not Feeneyite) was ' a development' for him ( and not for me, a Feeneyite).

BISHOP SANBORN AND FR.CEKADA COMFORTABLE WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EENS CUSHINGITE
Then in March 2015 the sedevacantists Bishop Donald Sanborn and Fr. Anthony Cekada indicated to me, via e-mails, that they would like to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism.They are well established in the USA and have property and finances under their control. They were not yet ready to affirm Feeneyite Vatican Council II or EENS.

BISHOP MARK PIVARUNAS WILL NOT CHOOSE VATICAN COUNCIL II FEENEYITE
Then in March 2018 there is no denial from Bishop Mark Pivarunas the Superior General of the sedevacantist community Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae(CMRI),USA.For him Vatican Council II (Cushingite) is a rupture with EENS(Feeneyite) and BOD(Cushingite) is a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite). So he will not affirm Vatican Council II, EENS and BOD with the Feeneyite reasoning. Instead he will continue to project Vatican Council II (Cushingite) as a rupture with Quanta Cura, Syllabus of Errors etc.Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) for me is not a rupture with these Church documents.Our premises are different and so our conclusions are different.The conclusion of the sedevacantists and traditionalists is non traditional.

SEDEVACANTISM BASED ON THE REJECTION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IS OBSOLETE
For those who have an insight into all this and are clear on my concepts of Feeneyism and Cushingism, it would be easy for them to see that sedevacantism based on Vatican Council II(Cushingite) is obsolete. Over time the average Catholic will know when his bishop is faking it.There will be Catholics who will proclaim the truth and not be worried about their bank accounnt, professorship,tenure, accreditation, mandatum etc.Sedevacantists will know that they can affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism, as a philosophy and theology.
The average Catholic would know that Cushingism is irrational and a ploy in the Church.


TRADITIONALISTS WILL KNOW THAT THEY CAN AFFIRM VATICAN COUNCIL II FEENEYITE.
Similarly in future Traditionalism with the rejection of Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) would be obsolete in as much as the writings of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre on Vatican Council II and EENS are obsolete.He did not know about Vatican Council II and EENS Feeneyite.



LIBERALISM  BASED ON VATICAN COUNCIL II CUSHINGITE IS ALSO OBSOLETE
Similarly liberalism based on Cushingite Vatican Council II is obsolete.The average Catholic, the rank and file Catholic is intelligent enough to know what is rational and who is faking it.
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria got away with it on March 1, 2018 since the traditionalists and sedevacantist Catholic leaders are still knocked out by Satan.They do not want to affirm EENS and Vatican Council II, Feeneyite.-Lionel Andrades
Image result for Photos of outside the Church there is no salvation

Related image

Image result for Photos of outside the Church there is no salvation

Image result for Photos of outside the Church there is no salvation






____________________________________




No comments: