CDF would have to discard the New Theology used to interpret EENS,Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents : this will end CMTV's doctrinal chaos

The dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) did not originate with Fr. Leonard Feeney and neither with the liberal theologians, who interpreted invisible for us baptism of desire(BOD) as being a visible exception to traditional EENS.

Now we have two interpretations of EENS.1) There is EENS in which visible for us BOD is an exception(Cushingism/New Theology) and 2) EENS in which invisible for us BOD is not an exception(Feeneyism/old ecclesiology).
For Simon Rafe  at Church Militant TV there is only an EENS (Cushingite). So if someone  does not infer that BOD refers to known and visible people (and that too saved outside the Church) he would consider it heresy.

So the original EENS(Feeneyite) would be heresy for him.The Church Councils, the popes and saints are in heresy according to Simon Rafe.This would be expressed in CMTV apologetics.This doctrinal chaos exists at CMTV since the Archbishop of Detroit affirms only EENS(Cushingite) and this has the approval of the Jewish Left.

However the St. Benedict Centers, traditionalists in the USA, still endorse EENS(Feeneyite) and reject EENS( Cushingite).So do I. (I attend Holy Mass in Italian and support Medugorje).

But the St.Benedict Centers(SBC) like Simon Rafe and Michael Voris,interpret Vatican Council II with invisible for us LG 16( invincible ignorance) and LG14( catechumen who desires baptism) being visible. They are Cushingites on Vatican Council II.They infer that LG 16 and LG 14 refer to known people saved outside the Church.So for the SBC and CMTV, Vatican Council II is a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the past ecclesiology and the Syllabus of Errors.This error is magisterial and is supported by the two popes, the Masons and all the cardinals.

They all want the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) to affirm Vatican Council II(Cushingite) like them.Since the SSPX rejects Vatican Council II(Cushingite) as being heretical, and it is, Michael Voris  and Cardinal Raymond Burke, perhaps in ignorance,say the SSPX is in schism.

This was like when the Magisterium in 1949 told Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston that he was in heresy when it really was Pope Pius XII,Cardinal Ottaviani and the other cardinals who were in heresy.

Today Cardinal Burke, CMTV and the traditionalists have a choice.They can endorse EENS(Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II(Feeneyite).There would then be no change in the Nicene Creed, the Catechisms could be interpreted  with Feeneyism  and there would no more be a false Profession of Faith, for religious and laity.

This would mean asking the Cushingite Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) tp approve EENS(Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) for all religious communities and Catholics at large.

The CDF would have to discard the New Theology they use to interpret EENS, Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents.

Then Simon Rafe  would be comfortable.He would say that he supports EENS and Vatican Council II interpreted  without the irrational premise( invisible people are visible) and conclusion( invisible people are examples of salvation outside the Church).Now he has to follow the heretical magisterium like the rest at CMTV.-Lionel Andrades