Pope Benedict needs to recant and end the doctrinal deception in the Church

Pope Benedict needs to recant his errors.They are errors according to the teachings of the Church. He is automatically excommunicated and is in manifest heresy.Most of his life he used Cushingism as a theology, to reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).At Vatican Council II he did not correct the use of Cushingism among the Council Fathers.As Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith he supported the error. He enforced it in the whole Church.

He took advantage of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre's ignorance if he was not ignorant himself.Vatican Council II(Cushingite) is a rupture with Tradition, so the Archbishop was correct.

The Prefect of the CDF did not tell him that Vatican Council II could be interpreted with the Feeneyism as a philosophy and theology.The premise and conclusion would be different.

Now even though there are so many reports on the Internet on this issue, along with archbishops Guido Pozzo and Augustine di Noia of Ecclesia Dei, Pope Benedict wants the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) to affirm Vatican Council II(Cushingite) for canonical recognition.

Similarly the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center in diocese of Worcester, USA were granted canonical status with the approval of the Vatican.Bishop Robert J.McManus, the bishop of Worcester, did not tell them that they could affirm Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) instead of Vatican Council II(Cushingite).

Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) would be in harmony with the ecclesiology of the Church affirmed by Fr. Leonard Feeney and the founders of the St.Benedict Centers.

All this doctrinal deception and confusion is there since Pope Benedict will not recant and correct his theological error.

Pope Benedict needs to say the obvious, which is,there are no practical exceptions to EENS in 2018.The baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) never were relevant or exceptions to EENS.Secondly, Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II is in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.

With Feeneyite theology LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, GS 22,NA 2 etc are not known and visible cases in 2018.So they do not contradict EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century. 

Pope Benedict made a mistake in March 2016 in the Avvenire interview when he said that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century. Since there was 'a development' with Vatican Council II for him. He suggested that there was known salvation outside the Church and questioned the need for mission.

Now we now know that Vatican Council II does not contradict itself, LG 16 does not contradict AG 7.

Also EENS is not contradicted by LG 16 and GS 22 as it was wrongly suggested by Cardinal Ratzinger  when he approved the theological paper Christianity and the World Religions of the International Theological Commission.He was assisted in the error by the then Fr. Luiz Ladaria s.j, who is the present Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Pope Benedict needs to correct the error. He also needs to acknowledge the theology of Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus is Cushingite and not Feeneyite.

-Lionel Andrades