Sunday, October 22, 2017

Seven Faculty Members Make Oath of Fidelity at Sacred Heart Major Seminary Detroit :affirming irrationality and heresy is obligatory

Image result for Logo of Sacred Heart Major Seminary detroitImage result for Logo of Sacred Heart Major Seminary detroit

Mass of the Holy Spirit marks opening of new academic year.

The Sacred Heart community celebrates the opening of a new academic year with the annual Mass of the Holy Spirit. During Mass, Sacred Heart’s rector, Msgr. Todd Lajiness, calls upon the Holy Spirit to bless the student body, bless the faculty and staff, and bless the seminary’s endeavors of the coming school year.
The congregation witnessed a moving and important ritual during the Mass of the Holy Spirit. Dean of Studies Fr. Timothy Laboe called new faculty members by name to approach the altar. Msgr. Lajiness placed before them the book of the Gospels. Laying a hand upon the book, each faculty member, full-time and part-time, recited a Profession of Faith and the Oath of Fidelity. During the Profession of Faith, faculty members recite the Nicene Creed. Following the profession is the Oath of Fidelity. It is taken to ensure that those who teach Catholic doctrine on faith and morals profess adherence to the teaching authority of the Church.
Making the Profession of Faith and Oath of Fidelity this year were Dr. Matthew Gerlach, Dr. Timothy Hogan, Fr. Brian Meldrum, Fr. Ronald Richards, Fr. Bryan Shackett, Dr. David Twellman and Fr. Pieter van Rooyen.
http://mosaic.shms.edu/new-faculty-members-make-oath-of-fidelity

AUGUST 10, 2017


Catholic students at Sacred Heart Major Seminary,Detroit need to rebel : Deception in theology, dishonesty in teachinghttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/catholic-students-at-sacred-heart-major.html

AUGUST 5, 2017

Faculty and students at Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit forced to use irrational Cushingism as a theology instead of Feeneyism: Michael Voris and CMTV also have to accept it

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/faculty-and-students-at-sacred-heart.html

AUGUST 15, 2017

For the Sacred Heart Major Seminary Detroit Vatican Council II is not exclusivist or traditional as it is for me.http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/for-sacred-heart-major-seminary-detroit.html


AUGUST 13, 2017


Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness grants accreditation to only those Catholic instituitions which do not admit that the Church made a mistakehttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/msgrtodd-j-lajiness-grants.html


AUGUST 12, 2017

Image result for Photos Rev. Msgr. Todd J. Lajiness

Rev. Msgr. Todd J. Lajiness, Rector and President of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit agrees with professors Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi and Phillip Blosser : no physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/rev-msgr-todd-j-lajiness-rector-and.html


AUGUST 12, 2017

Professors of Philosophy at Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit have to teach irrational philosophy and heretical theology since it is magisterial

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/professors-of-philosophy-at-sacred.html

 OCTOBER 22, 2017

Image result for Dr.Robert Fastiggi Photos

Dr.Robert Fastiggi's Scorecard

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/drrobert-fastiggis-scorecard.html



OCTOBER 22, 2017



Dr.Robert Fastiggi wants Bishop Donald Sanborn and Chris Ferrara to affirm a magisterium in heresy and schism like him

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/drrobert-fastiggi-wants-bishop-donald.html


Dr.Robert Fastiggi's Scorecard


Image result for Dr.Robert Fastiggi Photos

Dr.Robert Fastiggi's Scorecard.


Image result for Photos of Extra  ecclesiam nulla salus

Dr.Robert Fastiggi, professor of theology at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary Detroit, does not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) quoted here.Since for him invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.He uses the irrational premise to interpret EENS.

“There is but one universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved.” (Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, 1215.)
“We declare, say, define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff.” (
Pope Boniface VIII, the Bull Unam Sanctam, 1302.)
“The most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics, can have a share in life eternal; but that they will go into the eternal fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this ecclesiastical body that only those remaining within this unity can profit by the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, their almsgivings, their other works of Christian piety and the duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved, unless he remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church.” (
Pope Eugene IV, the Bull Cantate Domino, 1441.)
http://catholicism.org/category/outside-the-church-there-is-no-salvation
________________________________

He assumes hypothetical references in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 are non hypothetical and are examples of objective cases, known people saved outside the Church.So these documents become a rupture with Tradition when they really are not.If he did not use the false premise they would not be a rupture with traditional EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.
Image result for Photos of Catechism of the Catholic church
EXAMPLES OF THE HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCES IN THE CATECHISM FOR HIM WHICH ARE NOT HYPOTHETICAL.
1. 'God is not limited to the Sacraments'(CCC 1257)
'2.all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body'(CC(CCC 846).
3. Those 'justified by faith in Baptism are incorporated into Christ; they therefore have a right to be called Christians'(CCC 818).
4. They are 'joined in many ways to the baptized who are honored by the name of Christian, but do not profess the Catholic faith in its entirety or have not preserved unity or communion under the successor of Peter."(CCC 838).
5. 'the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims'(CCC 841).
__________________________________

Image result for Photos of Vatican Council II
EXAMPLES OF HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCES IN VATICAN COUNCIL II WHICH FOR HIM ARE NOT HYPOTHETICAL.
1. 'elements of sanctification and truth'in other religions(LG 8),
2..'good and holy' things in other religions(NA 2),
3..'a ray of that Truth which enlightens' all men(NA 2),
4.'imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3),
5.' people of good will in other religions'(GS 22),
6.' seeds of the Word'(AG 11),
7.'invincible ignorance'(LG 16),
8.'a good conscience'(LG 16) etc.
______________________________________

Image result for Photos of Letter of the Holy Office 1949
HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCES IN THE LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE 1949 TO THE ARCHBISHOP OF BOSTON WHICH FOR  HIM ARE NOT HYPOTHETICAL.

1.Therefore, no one will be saved who, knowing the Church to have been divinely established by Christ, nevertheless refuses to submit to the Church or withholds obedience from the Roman Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ on earth.(we do not know who this person is in particular so it is a hypothetical case.)

2.In His infinite mercy God has willed that the effects, necessary for one to be saved, of those helps to salvation which are directed toward man's final end, not by intrinsic necessity, but only by divine institution, can also be obtained in certain circumstances when those helps are used only in desire and longing.(we do not know any one in particular as such so this is a hypothetical case.)

3.Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member, but it is necessary that at least he be united to her by desire and longing.( if there is any such person he or she would only be known to God. So this passage is irrelevant to the dogma EENS. It cannot be an exception.Since it is a reference to an invisible person for us.)

4.However, this desire need not always be explicit, as it is in catechumens; but when a person is involved in invincible ignorance God accepts also an implicit desire, so called because it is included in that good disposition of soul whereby a person wishes his will to be conformed to the will of God.(it is a reference to an unknown catechumen)

 5.For in this letter the Sovereign Pontiff clearly distinguishes between those who are actually incorporated into the Church as members, and those who are united to the Church only by desire.( and we do not know any in particular.So this is a theoretical and hypothetical reference) -Lionel Andrades
___________________________________

TERMS EXPLAINED
Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reasoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.It affirms traditional EENS like the missionaries and magisterium of the 16th century.
Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS.There are exceptions to all needing to be incorporated into the Church for salvation.It wronly assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.So it uses the false premise to reject the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Irrational premise: It is assuming hypothetical cases are not hypothetical but instead are objective cases in the present times.It assumes invisible and unknown people are visible and unknown in our reality.
Baptism of Desire ( premise-free): It refers to the hypothetical case of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is an invisible case in our reality it, the baptism of desire, is not relevant to the dogma EENS.
Baptism of Desire (with the false premise): It refers to the known case of a catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved.A known person is assumed to be known.
Invincible Ignorance ( premise-free): This refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since it is a hypothetical case it is not an exception to the dogma EENS.The false premise was not used.
Invincible Ignorance (with the false premise): This refers to the explicit case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since it is an exception to the dogma EENS it is assumed to be objectively known in particular cases.This reasoning is irrational.
Council of Florence: One of the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS.It did not mention any exception.It did not mention the baptism of desire. It was premise-free.
Liberal theologians: They re-interpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as objective cases, known in the present times.They used the false premise.
Vatican Council II (with the premise): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II without the false premise.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS.
Vatican Council II ( premise-free):It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II without the false premise.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( premise-free),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell).
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston:(with the false premise) It assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times. So it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant to EENs.From the second part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.It used the false premise.
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( premise-free). It means interpreting the first part of the  the Letter without the false premise.Only the first part.It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.The traditional interpretatiion of the dogma EENS does not mention any exceptions.However the second part of the Letter contradicts the first part since it uses the false premise.
Letter of the Holy Office ( with the false premise).The second part of the Letter rejects the traditional interpretation of EENS. Since it considers the baptism of desire ( with the premise) and being saved in invincible ignorance ( with the premise) as being exceptions to EENS (premise-free). In other words they are mistaken for being visible and known cases when they really are invisible for us.It wrongly assumes hypothetical cases are objectively visible and so they are exceptions to the first part of the Letter.
Baltimore Catechism: It assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it like the baptism of water.The Baltimore Catechism is accepted with the confusion.It can be interpreted premise-free.
Catechism of Pope X: It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.It can be interpreted as being premise -free. The references to invincible ignorance etc have to be interpreted without the false premise. So it does not contradict the dogma EENS( premise-free).
Nicene Creed ( with the premise): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means there are more than three known baptisms when the false premise is used in the interpretation. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc.This is an irrational but common understanding.
Nicene Creed ( premise-free): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.
New Theology: : (with the premise) It refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma EENS.With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with Tradition.It is of course based on the false premise.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( with the false premise).It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions.The baptism of desire( with the premise), baptism of blood( with the premise) and being saved in invincible ignorance( with the premise) are exceptions to dogma as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( premise-free): It refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.There are no known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell.Invisible for us baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are not visible exceptions to all needing to be incorporated into the Catholic Church for salvation.
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( with the premise): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( premise-free). So this is an interpretation of the Catechism with the false premise.
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( premise-free): CCC 1257 does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since there are no known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. There are no known cases in the present times of God not being not limited to the Sacraments(CCC1257).When CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the dogmatic teaching on all needing to formally enter the Church.It is a reference to a hypothetical case and not somebody known. CCC 846 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvation.
Robert Fastiggi, Ph.D., teaches a class of priests studying in Sacred Heart Major Seminary’s graduate program in the New Evangelization.  Dan Meloy | The Michigan Catholic
Conclusion: 
He interprets Church documents with Cushingism instead ofFeeneyism.
He uses the Irrational Premise.
He chooses the Baptism of Desire (with the false premise) and  Invincible Ignorance (with the false premise).
He irrationally also chooses Vatican Council II (with the premise).
It is the same with the  Letter of the Holy Office ( with the false premise) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( with the premise).
In first class heresy according to the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II he chooses the Nicene Creed ( with the premise).
It has always been Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( with the false premise)and not according to the missionaries in the 16th century, premise-free.
With the irrational premise he interprets the Baltimore Catechism and the Catechism of Pope Pius X as a rupture with Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( premise-free).
The New Theology of Ecclesia Dei and the CDF is based on the irrational premise.
He can choose extra ecclesiam nulla salus premise-free but will not do so. He can choose to interpret Vatican Council II( premise-free) which will not be a rupture with EENS( premise-free) but he will not do so.
The Nicene Creed with the premise is heresy and is used in the Profession of Faith for  religious when they accept  a new responsibility.-Lionel Andrades
__________________________________________
CTOBER 22, 2017 Dr.Robert Fastiggi wants Bishop Donald Sanborn and Chris Ferrara to affirm a magisterium in heresy and schism like him  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/drrobert-fastiggi-wants-bishop-donald.html
DECEMBER 17, 2016
When I meet a non Catholic on the streets I know he is on the way to Hell since the Catholic Church teaches this : this would be news for many Catholics
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/search/label/Hell
http://www.themichigancatholic.org/2016/07/sacred-heart-major-seminary-trains-priests-across-north-america-evangelize/