Tuesday, October 3, 2017

Simple way for the SSPX to show Card.Burke that they are not in schism

Image result for Photo of SSPX reconciliation
For Cardinal Raymond Burke not to say that the SSPX is in schism they simply have to 1) affirm the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) 2) along with invisible for us baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).
Then they have to inform the Vatican that they endorse EENS(with no exceptions) and they also endorse Vatican Council II (with no known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS and the old ecclesiology).That's all that there is to it.
Upon the old ecclesiology is based the ecumenism of return, non Catholics needing to be incorporated into the Church as members to avoid Hell and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation with the non separation of Church and State.
Image result for Photo of SSPX reconciliation
So then the SSPX cannot be said to be in schism since they accept Vatican Council II(Feeneyite), while Cardinal Burke does not affirm it.
They accept EENS (Feeneyite), while Cardinal Burke does not do so.
They accept the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance as referring to only hypothetical cases.They are not known people saved outside the Church.This is common sense.They cannot be anything else.But for Cardinal Burke they are personally known people saved outside the Church and so they are exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.For him and the two popes, EENS is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.
The SSPX would be accepting the Nicene Creed as referring to one, known baptism for the forgiveness of sins.It is the baptism of water.For Cardinal Burke and the two popes it is really I believe in three known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins, desire, blood and invincible ignorance and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.So for Cardinal Burke there are three known baptisms and they are examples of salvation outside the Church.
For the SSPX, Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) would have the hermeneutic of continuity with the dogma EENS, the past ecclesiology , traditional ecumenism and the teachings on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.
The important point that the SSPX must be aware of is - do they interpret BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to physically visible or invisible cases ? Similarly do they interpret LG 16, UR 3 etc as referring to known people saved outside the Church or are  they simply hypothetical cases?-Lionel Andrades

A priest cannot really know if a couple in concubinage are living as brother and sister : Obfuscation Principle in Amoris Laetitia overlooked in salvation theology by Cardinal Burke

A priest cannot visit a young unmarried couple living together and assume they are loving as brother and sister- even if they say so.
Neither can he tell them to follow their conscience and continue to do so.
Humanly speaking there is no way that he can know that a particular couple is an exception to the teaching on mortal sin and will not be going to Hell.There cannot physically be an exception to the teaching on mortal sin since finally only Jesus will know the exact state of the soul of an un-married couple living together or that of the case of the divorced and re-married.There can be no known exception for the priest.
If the priest says that a particular couple is an exception then he is saying that what is unknowable is knowable for him.He is mixing up what is only known to God as being known also to man. So in principle he assumes what is unknown is known when he visits a couple in concubinage and tells them to receieve the Eucharist.This is the Obfuscation Principle, in morals.It is also used in faith and is approved by ecclesiastical Masonry and also the two living popes.
In principle, they assume unknown cases in the present times, of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I), are known exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So they infer BOD,BOB and I.I are examples of visible salvation outside the Church. Mystici Corporis and other Church documents are re-interpreted as referring to known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I which excludes the baptism of water, even though no one has seen or known any such case in real life.
So with this ruse -or ignorance- in principle they accept that there are invisible cases which are visible exceptions to the traditional teaching on morals and faith(salvation).There are allegedly unknown cases, which they infer are known examples of exceptions to Tradition- which is now the new norm in the Catholic Church.
Cardinal Burke objects to this in Amoris Laetitia but accepts it de fide and de facto in salvation theology.For him there is no more exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church since in Vatican Council II, LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, GS 22 etc refer to visible people who are allegedly saved outside the Church, even though in reality they are invisible for all of us.So with this Obfuscation Principle there is no more exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church even for Cardinal Raymond Burke and the 62-plus signatoris of the Filial Correction of Pope Francis.-Lionel Andrades
 
 
October 2, 2017
Pope Francis repeats in principle error in Amoris Laetitia : believes we humans can judge exceptions to moral and salvation teachings of the Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/pope-francis-repeats-in-principle-error.html

October 2, 2017
Two popes and cardinals have made an in principle mistake in faith and morals : physically invisible is visible
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/two-popes-and-cardinals-have-made-in.html

October 2, 2017
Cardinal Burke has made an in principle mistake in faith and morals since we cannot judge exceptions to the general rule on mortal sin and exclusive salvation

 October 2, 2017
The issue is Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and they don't know: Cardinal Burke on SSPX schism http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/the-issue-is-vatican-council-ii.html

October 2, 2017
Hugh Hefner is howling in Hell : Fr.Longenecker's Amoris Laetitia morality is not sure
 
 September 30, 2017
Pope Francis supports the Obfuscation Principle in the interpretation of Catholic morals and salvation : correction needed http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/09/pope-francis-supports-obfuscation.html
 
 September 30, 2017
Philosophical subjectivism in morals and salvation supported by Pope Francis : Amoris Laetitia negates St.Thomas http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/09/philosophical-subjectivism-in-morals.html