Thursday, August 31, 2017

Catholic professors of Philosophy world wide teach a falsehood to keep their job : bad philosophy is politically correct

Catholic professors of Philosophy all over the world are teaching a falsehood to keep their job.They knowingly use a false premise in philosophy to interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The deception is not only there in the pontifical universities but also at the sedevacantist and SSPX seminaries and colleges.
Image result for Photo of AristotleImage result for Photo of Aristotle
 They teach about good and evil, and the philosophy of Plato and Aristotle and also teach that invisible people can be visible at the same time.They teach Aristotle's Principle of Non Contradiction and also that invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). People in Heaven are visible exceptions on earth for them. 
Image result for Photo of  Philosophy of ReligionImage result for Photo of  Philosophy of ReligionImage result for Photo of  Philosophy of Religion
They teach students Metaphysics which deals with the first principles of things including abstracts like time and space..Then they teach students to interpret Vatican Council II with all hypothetical and abstract cases being objective and personally known and they exclude the baptism of water, as if they would know.
There are no known cases of any one saved outside the Church and yet they will teach students to assume that BOD, BOB and I.I are examples of salvation outside the Church.With this special Logic they  contradict the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.
They are interested in the concept of truth and tell a philosophical lie like there being known salvation in the present times and so every one does not need to be a card carrying member of the Catholic Church.
Image result for Photo of  Philosophical limits
Even priest-professors of philosophy who get a salary, annual vacation,perks and privileges are formally teaching deception to keep the career.
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney states:-

Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church as a member.- Letter of the Holy Office 1949

Why, in order to obtain eternal salvation, it is not necessary always to be incorporated in the Church as a member?

It is not necessary because BOD, BOB and  I.I are exceptions, it is reasoned out by the professors of philosophy.
And why are they exceptions and how are they exceptions a student could ask?
The answer.They are exceptions since this is a reference to known  people saved outside the Church.This is their Reasoning. Analytical Skills.There are people saved with visible to us  BOD, BOB and I.I therefore there are exceptions.So everyone does not need to enter the Church as a member is the conclusion of those who teach Aristotle Logic.
Where are these people on earth? Nobody knows.Yet they cannot tell the truth since the Vatican does not allow this.
Image result for Photo of bad philosophy Aristotle
How can invisible for us BOD, BOB and I.I be visible exceptions to all needing to enter the Church for salvation? It cannot, of course.This is irrational.How can people in Heaven saved with BOD, BOB and I.I be visible exceptions to EENS? This is irrational. Yet they must teach this philosophical error to be allowed to teach.
Image result for Photo of bad philosophy
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 has used this false reasoning . It assumes invisible and unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are known and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.
How can BOD, BOB and I.I be practical exceptions to EENS? Where are the people in 2017 saved with BOD, BOB and I.I? There are none for us human beings.If they existed they would only be known to God.
So by assuming invisible people are visible the Letter states :-
Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church as a member
This false philosophy is being taught at all Catholic seminaries and universities.It makes LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, UR 3 etc to look like references to objective people. 
Vatican Council really does not  contradict the missionaries of the 16th century on EENS, as Pope Benedict wrongly explained in March 2016 in a public rupture of faith and reason.
Image result for Photo of SocratesImage result for Photo of Philosophy student
Vatican Council II is Traditional. It is in harmony with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.The ecclesiology of the Church is exclusivist at Holy Mass irrespective if it is in Italian, Latin or Greek.
The Catholic philosophers, religious and laypersons, teach Realism and Empiricism but cannot get themself to say that emperically, in real life, we cannot see any exception to the dogma EENS.
Philosophical Pragmatism demands that they see the truth past the illusion of visible for us BOD, BOB and I.I.Instead worldly pragmatism makes them deceptive.
They teach about Moral Relativism in the abstract while in real life they deceive students as if they are in a Communist country and are forced to teach the approved ideology in the syllabus.
Image result for Photo of Metaphysics Philosophy
Even after being informed they will not affirm the dogma EENS.They choose expedience.Free Will is another subject.
Imagine teaching Cognitive Relativism as a subject and then saying people in Heaven are objective exceptions to all needing to enter the Church for salvation.So Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance) becomes a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church which they dare not affirm with free will.
Image result for Photo of  Philosophy of Religion
In class they discuss 'can we really ever know something', 'what is the good in life'  and 'the love of wisdom' and then they tell students that Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston was wrong for not philosophically seeing visible people on earth saved without the baptism of water.So students are prepared for the coming brand new, accompanying false theology.
Image result for Photo of  Philosophy of ReligionImage result for Photo of  Philosophy of Religion
They support the magisterium of the 1949 Holy Office which mistook unknown people as being known and set the ground for the excommunication of innocent Fr. Leonard Feeney.
Why study Ethics ? It creates peace and good in society . There is also peace when unethically  students are not told that Vatican Council II is really in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and so all non Catholics are on the way to Hell.This will cause tension and controversy which is not 'a good' and 'a value' in society'.Utilitarianism is a branch of philosophy.
Image result for Photo of  Philosophical limits
At Catholic universities the Professors of Philosophy are obligated to teach Nietzche, Jean Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir and the deadly Heidegger.They are also forced to teach that there is known salvation outside the Church even when they cannot name any one in Heaven who is saved outside the Church.It comes with the job.
Image result for Photo of  Philosophical limits
Existence precedes essence.First comes  satisfying Maslow's basic needs and then the abstract teachings on essence, substance and truth,which are all relative in real life.
Criticial thinking skills and seeking the truth are among the familiar terms in Catholic philosophy.But no one is allowed to say that invisible for us baptism of desire cannot be a visible exception to the dogma EENS.It is not politically approved Catholic philosophy.No one is allowed to use this reasoning.-Lionel Andrades

Cardinal Braz de Avez and Fr.Sabino Ardito are still stalling : Announcement awaited from Franciscans of the Immaculate


When Cardinal Braz de Avez told the Franciscans of the Immaculate that they had to accept Vatican Council II, the Sisters could have simply announced that they accept Vatican Council II with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) referring to hypothetical cases only.They are not objective and personally known people in 2017. So the Franciscans affirm all hypothetical cases simply as being hypothetical.This includes LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, GS 22, NA 2, AG7, AG 11 etc.That's all.
This is the Vatican Council II which the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate affirm.They should ask Cardinal Braz de Avez and Fr. Ardito, the Commissar to do the same.

CONTINUE TO REJECT VATICAN COUNCIL II (CUSHINGITE)
They must continue to reject Vatican Council II when LG 16 etc are interpreted as referring to visible and known people saved outside the Church.There are no such people.There are no practical exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

VATICAN POLICIY ON MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS HERETICAL
Cardinal Braz de Avez's concept of Vatican Council II is with LG 16 referring to known people saved outside the Church in 2017.For him hypothetical and invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.This is the heretical and pro-Left Vatican policy in the interpretation of magisterial documents including Vatican Council II.

POPE BENEDICT BRAZENLY ANNOUNCED THAT THEY HAD CHANGED EENS
So in March 2016 Pope Benedict XVI brazenly and heretically announced via Avvenire that EENS was no more like it was for the magisterium of the past.He said that there was ' a development'.He meant hypothethical and invisible people saved with BOD, BOB and I.I are practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.So Vatican Council II was for him a rupture with the missionaries of the 16th century.A dogma had 'developed'.

ASK CARD.AVEZ TO AFFIRM VATICAN COUNCIL II (FEENEYISM)
If the Franciscans of the Immaculate have already informed Cardinal Braz de Avez and Fr. Sabino Ardito last year about the need to accept Vatican Council II without the irrational premise and they have done nothing, then could announce that they affirm Vatican Council II and EENS, with the theology of Feeneyism and reject Cushingite theology.Then appeal to Cardinal Braz to affirm Vatican Council II.

DO NOT VIOLATE THE PRINCIPLE OF NON CONTRADICTION
So for the Franciscans invisible people would just be invisible, hypothetical and theoretical cases would not be practical exceptions to EENS in 2017.They will not violate the Principle of Non Contradiction as do the two popes and all the cardinals.

AFFIRM BOD, BOB AND I.I BUT ONLY AS HYPOTHETICAL CASES
If Cardinal Braz asks the Franciscans to accept BOD, BOB and I.I then they should tell him that they do so. BOD, BOB and I.I are acceptable.They are accepted as theoretical possibilities, hypothetical cases, speculation with good will.They would only be known only to God.They can only be hypothetical cases. So they can only be accepted as hypothetical cases and not visible people saved outside the Church.

AFFIRMING BOD, BOB AND I.I AS EXCEPTIONS TO EENS CONTRADICTS THE PRINCIPLE OF NON CONTRADICTION
If Cardinal Avez or Fr.Ardito says that the Franciscans have to accept BOD, BOB and I.I as exceptions to EENS then they should thell them that this is not rational or traditional and the conclusion would result in heresy.It also violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.
How can non existing people be exceptions to EENS?How can a de fide, ex cathedra dogma like EENS be contradicted by invisible people who do not exist in our human reality?
So the Franciscans must continue to reject Vatican Council II with LG 16 etc being interpreted as referring to known and visible people saved outside the Church. There are no such people.There are no practical exceptions to the dogma EENS.
Remember ecclesiastical Masonry wants Fr. Manelli and the F.I communities to accept Vatican Council II (Cushingite) instead of Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite). Resist, resist, resist.Like me, be prepared always to sleep on the streets.-Lionel Andrades