Tuesday, July 25, 2017

Bishop Athanasius Schneider does not respond to e-mails or reports on the Internet : Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of No Contradiction in the interpretation of Vatican Council II


Image result for Photo of Bishop Athanasius Schneider hiding the truth

Bishop Athanasius Schneider will still not say that Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of No Contradiction in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents even after I have e-mailed him and there are numerous reports on the Internet.He is protecting himself. Soon he will issue another report on the Internet  or do an interview on the subject of Vatican Council II.He will interpret the Council with the same irrational premise. He will choose Vatican Council II Cushingite instead of Feeneyite, since this is expected him of him by the Vatican.
He calls upon Catholics to proclaim the truth but he will not do it since it could be an expensive sacrifice to make.
His statements otherwise on Vatican Council II are vague and politically accommodating. He will say there is salvation in only the Catholic Church but will not say that there are no exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).He will not affirm Feeneyite EENS since invisible baptism of desire is a visible exception for him, to the strict interpretation, as it was known in the 16th century.
He is a modernist on this sensitive issue while he otherwise  criticizes modernism in the Catholic Church.
“We are living in a very special time of a deep crisis of faith inside the Church,” said Bishop Athanasius Schneider, the Auxiliary in the diocese of Maria Santissima in Kazakhstan, who opens the video, produced by LifeSiteNews and yet he will not say that Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of No Contradiction in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents 
Cardinal Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which made the objective mistake. It mixed up invisible cases as being visible.This determines how they and the popes interpret Vatican Council II.If they would believe that Cardinal Richard Cushing and not Fr.Leonard Feeney was in heresy in 1949 then the interpretation of Vatican Council II changes.
If Cardinal Cushing was wrong to assume there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus then Vatican Council II is traditional and has the old ecclesiology.Since there would no be exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to the dogma EENS as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.
Presently Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider both reject Feeneyism which says, according to me, that there are no known exceptions to the dogma EENS.For them there are exceptions!
For them the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to known people saved without the baptism of water.So LG 16 etc becomes an  objective and known exception to the dogma EENS, even though there are no such cases on earth.Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with Tradition because of their personal irrationality and not because of the text of the Council.
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 assumed that imaginary cases of the baptism of desire etc were not imaginary. This same error in reasoning is made by Cardinal Burke and Bishop Athansius Schneider.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider has called for a Syllabus of Errors on Vatican Council II  and Cardinal Burke has called for a new catechesis  when both of them do not see the factual mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, upon which so much of Vatican Council II,and their theology, is based.
Vatican Council II does not haev a hermeneutic of continuity only when hypothetical  cases are considered explicit.Subjective cases are considered objective.
If they correct this error and re-read Vatican Council II ,without the premise from 1949 Letter of the Holy Office, the Council does not contradict the traditional teachings of the Church on other religions and Christian communities.
Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) does not contradict the original Syllabus of Errors or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So there is no need for a new Syllabus of Errors.
The new ecumenism is based on Cushingite theology created by the false premise. With the old ecclesiology intact; with Feeneyism, there can only be an old ecclesiology and so only an ecumenism of return.
-Lionel Andrades


JULY 22, 2017

Bishop Schneider will not say that Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of Non Contradiction

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/bishop-schneider-will-not-say-that-pope.html


 JULY 22, 2017

Rorate Caeili and Bishop Schneider do not write that Pope Francis made a factual mistake, an objective error in his interpretation of Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/rorate-caeili-and-bishop-schneider-do.html


ULY 21, 2017


Bishop Athanasius Schneider still incoherent and confused : has repeated last report without addressing previous critical points

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/bishop-athanasius-schneider-still.html


JULY 19, 2017


When will Rorate Caeili learn?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/when-will-rorate-caeili-learn.html


JULY 17, 2017


Catholic political parties must teach Catholics the faith which is not being taught by religious due to political pressure

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/catholic-political-parties-must-teach.html


JULY 16, 2017


Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi do not deny that Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and non traditional conclusion

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/ralph-martin-and-robert-fastiggi-do-not.html


JULY 14, 2017


Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi, John Martignoni and Fr. Stefano Visintin osb indicate Pope Francis has violated the Principle of Non Contradiction in his interpretation of Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/ralph-martin-robert-fastiggi-john_27.html


JULY 13, 2017


Pope Francis violates the Principle of Non Contradiction: chooses irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II which is not the work of the Holy Spirit

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/pope-francis-violates-principle-of-non.html


JULY 13, 2017


Prof. Robert Fastiggi, Ralph Martin agree that invisible people cannot be visible at the same time : in agreement with Fr. Stefano Visintin's statement

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/prof-robert-fastiggi-ralph-martin-agree.html



JULY 11, 2017


Fr.Stefano Visintin osb new Rector University of St. Anselm at loggerheads with Cardinal Ladaria: attack on the New Theology with hard facts

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/frstefano-visintin-osb-new-rector.html


JULY 11, 2017


Scientist-Benedictine priest who says the baptism of desire was never an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is the new Rector at St. Anselm, Rome

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/scientist-benedictine-priest-who-says.html


JULY 6, 2017


Everything hinges on visible baptism of desire : correct the premise and change the Council

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/everything-hinges-on-visible-baptism-of.html


JULY 5, 2017


To accomodate the error of visible baptism of desire Cardinal Ratzinger changed the Profession of Faith, Oath of Fidelity and Canon Law

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/to-accomodate-error-of-visible-baptism.html


JULY 3, 2017


The bottom line is that we are all reciting the Nicene Creed but there are two different interpretations

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/the-bottom-line-is-that-we-are-all.html


JULY 2, 2017


Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.j made factual errors in two ITC theological papers which were politically correct

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-made-factual.html



 JULY 1, 2017


Solemn Tridentine Rite Mass tomorrow with manifest sacrilege

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/solemn-tridentine-rite-mass-tomorrow.html


JUNE 30, 2017


Tridentine Rite Mass in Rome is a sacrilege : needs to be challenged canonically

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/tridentine-rite-mass-in-rome-is.html



JUNE 30, 2017


No priest in Rome will give his telephone number

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/no-priest-in-rome-will-give-his_30.html



JUNE 29, 2017


Pamphlet problems : no priest available

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/pamphlet-problems-no-priest-available.html


________________________________________________________________

To assume BOD, BOB and I.I are relevant or exceptions to the dogma EENS, is an objective error and so cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit in the Catechism of the Catholic Church

Image result for Sacred Heart Major Seminary Detroit logo
Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi, professors of theology at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary,Detroit,accept all magisterial documents, but with the theology of Cushingism.This is the wide spread Arian- like heresy in the Church.It makes Vatican Council II a rupture with Tradition. Without this Cushingite theology the Council has a continuity with the past.
They both now agree I mentioned in a previous post that hypothetical and invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), and blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance of the Gospel through no fault of one own(I.I) are not physically visible cases in 2017.Invisible people are not visible.So they cannot be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).They never were.
A theoretical possibility or hypothesis is not a concrete and known exception in the present times to all needing to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid the fires of Hell.
The two professors indicate by their silence, in e-mail communication I have with them, that the present magisterium has made an objective mistake.Since the magisterium accepts the Cushingite theology, the New Theology, based on BOD, BOB and I.I being visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.1

 Image result for Photos of Catechism of the Catholic Church
 



The magisterium has made a mistake, an objective mistake, a factual mistake.
Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi will not directly say the magisterium, the popes, have made a mistake and neither will they defend the New Theology and the magisterium.They keep silent and read what I write.
This mistake is there in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994) too.It mentions being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), the baptism of desire(BOD) and baptism of blood(BOB) which were and are, really irrelevant to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the old ecclesiology of the Church.So they should not have been mentioned.They are superflous.

So when we read the Catechism, all references to BOD, BOB and I.I, we have to note, refer to hypothetical cases.Invisible people.
This is how we have to read Vatican Council II too.
To assume BOD, BOB and I.I are relevant or exceptions to the dogma EENS, is an objective error and so cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.If the error was made in the Baltimore Catechism it still is an objective error.
The Holy Spirit cannot make a mistake in the Catechism or in Vatican Council II.This is human error.
Invisible for us baptism of desire was never a visible exception to the dogma EENS now even Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi agree.They were never exceptions to the dogma EENS said Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson.Zero cases of something are not exceptions says the apologist John Martignoni.They are supported by Fr.Stefano Visintin osb, the new Rector of the University of St. Anselm, Rome.
For Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and Cardinal Christopher Schonborn zero cases of something were exceptions, when they put together the Catechism approved by the liberals and the Left. They did not correct the philosophical error in Vatican Council II but consolidated it.
-Lionel Andrades


1.
July 24, 2017

Joint statement on Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite ) needed from Bishop Donald Sanborn and Prof. Robert Fastiggi and Ralph Martin

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/joint-statement-on-vatican-council-ii.html

April 25, 2017

Bishop Robert C.Morlino needs to interpret the Catechism with Feeneyism then the laity can do the same in study groups

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/bishop-robert-cmorlino-needs-to.html

Parish priests will not allow the Catechism to be interpreted with the theology of Feeneyism. They could be suspended or transferred.

APRIL 24, 2017

Until Fr.Zuhlsdorf or a bishop affirms the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism lay Catholics have to affirm the Faith independently and with the opposition of the local Cushingite bishop

Tracy Rowland, Fr. John Zuhlsdorf and Bishop Morlino in the Diocese of Madison, USA are 'doing theology' with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism
From left, Bavarian Prime Minister Horst Seehofer, Monsignor Georg Gaenswein, Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI and his brother, Georg, sit on the occasion of a party for Benedict's 90th birthday at the Vatican, April 17, 2017.

Pope Benedict XVI at 90 : theological deception and compromise