Thursday, July 13, 2017

Pope Francis violates the Principle of Non Contradiction: chooses irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II which is not the work of the Holy Spirit

Featured ImagePope Francis and Cardinal Donald Wuerl suggest that Vatican Council II is the work of the Holy Spirit without differentiating between Vatican Council Feeneyite and Vatican Council II Cushingite.There is a difference between Vatican Council II without an irrational premise or one with the premise.There is  Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic continuity or one with a rupture.One is de fide and traditional and the other is heretical and violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.Pope Francis  interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism, which is irrational and heretical. It cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.
The passages in Vatican Council II which mention the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance (AG 7, LG 14) are superfluous. They should not have been there in the Council text.They never were exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Stefano Visintin osb, the  new Rector of the Pontifical University of St.Anselm Rome.
Juan Javier Flores Arcas e Stefano Visintin
They are there since the Council Fathers did not know of the mistake made by the magisterium in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office.They used a false premise (invisible baptism of desire is visible). This is the false new theology of Vatican Council II (Cushingism).It  is the only interpretation of Vatican Council II known to the two popes.
Now Pope Francis with Cushingite Vatican Council II violates the Principle of Non Contradiction ( how can people in Heaven be visible exceptions on earth? ). Yet this is his heretical understanding of Vatican Council II.His conclusion is false. How can invisible for us Lumen Gentium 16 etc be considered visible and excluding the baptism of water ? Is this rational reasoning? No. Is this Catholic philosophy? No. Where is the person saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church in 2017? There is no such person.So is the pope and Cardinal Donald Wuerl suggesting there is such a known person? Yes since they are Cushingites.
Pope Francis promotes the New Theology which is not the work of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake.How can the New Theology suggest that there is salvation outside the Church? Who in the past could have seen someone saved outside the Church? Who could have said that they have seen a St.Emerentiana or a  St.Victor  saved in Heaven with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water? No one. Physically it is not possibile for us humans and the Church does not recognise some one who had the ability to see such cases.So there is no known salvation outside the Church.
The pope can speculate that there is a person outside the Church who is saved.But he would not know personally.He can believe and hope there is a person who is in Heaven who is a  non Catholic and is a saint.But he would not know personally. This is something only God can know.
The pope suggests that there is a saint or someone saved  outside the Church while he violates the Principle of Non Contradiction in his rejection of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite)

Now the two popes also violate the Principle of Non Contradiction in the interpretation of the Nicene Creed. For them 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins'  is really 'I believe in three or more known baptisms, desire, blood, invincible ignorance etc for the forgiveness of sins and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.' Where are these known baptism of desire cases? Who can administer the baptism of desire? When is the baptism of desire visible practically like the baptism of water? It is not! This is all irrationality.
I have mentioned in a blog post yesterday 1 we have a pope who does not believe in Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite), the dogma extra ecclesiam nullas salus( Feeneyite), Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite), Catechisms ( Feeneyite) and he has issued another moto proprio in which he suggests that there is known salvation and sainthood outside the Catholic Church.He uses philosophical subjectivism to change the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church on exclusive salvation.This is pro-Masonic. He also uses philosophical subjectivism to change moral theology.This is evident in the moral theology being taught at Pontifical universities and in his un-apostolic exhortation, Amoris Laeitia.
If the pope accepted Vatican Council II Feeneyite then  young couples  engaged to be married could ask their bishops and priests to interpret the Nicene Creed without the irrational premise, before they are married.Parish Councils and Marriage Tribunals will demand that a Protestant converts into the Catholic Church before he oe she marries a Catholic.Since the non Catholic is outside the Church according to Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14),the  inter faith marriage will not be a Sacrament and a dispensation should  not be given.
Image result for Photo of Cardinal Ladaria with cardinal muller
Cardinal Ladaria, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,  would be asked to affirm Vatican Council II, Feeneyite instead of Cushingite.All religious at their Profession of Faith or Renewal of Vows would be consistent.They would be saying ' I believe in one baptism for the forgivness of sins' and mean only one known baptism and not three.Mission would be based on knowing that all non Catholics are oriented to Hell with no known exceptions, in the present times.There could only be an ecumenism of return, since there are no exceptions to the old ecclesiology of the Church based on outside the Church there is no salvation.Since there are only Catholics in Heaven and every one needs to enter the Church as a member to avoid Hell the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation would be a priority,for salvation,as would be the need for the non separation of Church and State.The Franciscans of the Immaculate, the Society of St. Pius X and the sedevacantist communities would only be asked to accept Vatican Council II Feeneyite which is traditional in its theology and doctrines.They could reject Vatican Council II Cushingite since it is heretical and not the work of the Holy Spirit.-Lionel Andrades

1.
July 12, 2017
Pope's moto proprio suggests there is known salvation and sainthood outside the Catholic Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/popes-moto-proprio-suggests-there-is.html

______________________________________

 October 16, 2016
If the whole world violates the Principle of Non Contradiction then the whole world is wrong.If you and the other sedevacantists assume imaginary cases are physically visible in 2016 then you all are wrong
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/if-whole-world-violates-principle-of.html

October 14, 2016
The Principle of Non Contradiction cannot be violated irrespective of the importance of the people or their numbers
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/the-principle-of-non-contradiction.html
The New Theology in itself violates the Principle of Non Contraduction http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/09/the-new-theology-in-itself-violates.html


SSPX and Novus Ordo priests in Regensburg are willing to accept the New Theology which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/the-sspx-is-to-ordain-priests-at.html

Ann Barnhardt is a Catholic even though she violates the Principle of Non Contradiction http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/ann-barnhardt-is-catholic-even-though.html

The New Theology, the official Cushingite theology contradicts the Principle of Non Contradiction http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/the-new-theology-official-cushingite.html

IT IS A METAPHYSICAL LAW THAT WE CANNOT SEE OR KNOW PERSONS SAVED OR ABOUT TO BE SAVED WITH THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE, WITH OR WITHOUT THE BAPTISM OF WATER? http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/o-it-is-metaphysical-law-that-we-cannot.html
Card. Ratzinger interpreted Vatican Council II with an irrationality when a rational option was available .He then excommunicated Abp. Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops for not accepting this heretical version of the faith
Questions and Answers : Vatican Council II is Feeneyite. It has an exclusivist ecclesiology http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-vatican-council.html







Questions and Answers : Did the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 make a factual mistake ? http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-did-letter-of.html

Questions and Answers : Evangelizing with Vatican Council II

JUNE 8, 2016





Muller, Di Noia and Fellay made an objective mistake : hypothetical cases are assumed to be explicit

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/muller-di-noia-and-fellay-made_8.html
APRIL 6, 2016

Yes! I am glad you have understood what I have been saying! Praised be Jesus and Our Lady.The issue comes down to our having no known cases of known salvation outside formal membership in the RCC



http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/yes-i-am-glad-you-have-understood-what.html


MARCH 29, 2016

"Thanks for providing this! God bless the Society!", " I agree with much of what Lionel says" http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/thanks-for-providing-this-god-bless.html


http://www.onepeterfive.com/in-his-own-words-cardinal-schonborn-on-exhortations-deepest-concerns/


Bishop Bernard Fellay contradicted by Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson, John Martignoni : Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/05/bishop-bernard-fellay-contradicted-by.html


Prof. Robert Fastiggi, Ralph Martin agree that invisible people cannot be visible at the same time : in agreement with Fr. Stefano Visintin's statement

I have received a reply to my email from Prof. Robert Fastiggi, Professor of Systematic theology  at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, in the Archdiocese of Detroit.The email was sent jointly to him and Prof. Ralph Martin, also a professor of theology at Sacred Heart.I sent them a copy of yesterday's blog post 'Ralph Martin and theologians at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary Detroit contradicted by Stefano Visintin osb, new Rector at St. Anselm Rome'.1
Image result for Photo of Prof.Robert FastiggiImage result for Photo of Ralph Martin
They both agree with Fr.Stefano Visintin osb the new Rector of the Pontifical Univesity of St.Anselm, Rome.He has said that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance cannot be explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They too agree with the obvious. They have not denied it.
This is not a private opinion or a private theology of mine.It is something obvious to all rational human beings.
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its second part,wrongly assumed that there were known exceptions to the dogma EENS.This objective error has not been corrected by the popes since Pius XII.
The popes have not asked ,'How can people in Heaven be living exceptions on earth to all needing to members of the Catholic Church for salvation'?
For Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi and the Chancery Offices in the Archdiocese of Detroit, invisible cases were visible exceptions to the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries, for example, in the 16th century.Since, they accepted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.So this is what they inferred whether they knew it or not.
Pope Benedict XVI  also approved the Letter, and supported the New Theology based upon the error in the Letter. In 2012 'Dr. Martin was appointed by Pope Benedict XVI as an "expert" for the World Synod of Bishops on the New Evangelization'.Both use irrational Cushingite theology.Martin has written books unaware of traditionlal Feeneyite theology, without the irrational premise.
I also affirm the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 but only the first part. Since the second part contradicts the first part and the dogma EENS and Tradition( Syllabus of Errors etc).It cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit cannot make a factual mistake, a wrong observation of life, and then suggest that the inspired past magisteriums of the Church were wrong.Human error could do this.
The faculty at Detroit understand the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Cantate Domini, Council of Florence 1441), 'in the bad light' of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.Professors Fastiggi and Martin have not denied that the Letter made an objective mistake when it assumed non existing people were relevant or concrete exceptions to the traditional exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.They simply accept the Letter with the error since it is magisterial.
They also acknowledge indirectly that the New Theology approved by the magisterium and taught in the Archdiocese of Detroit, to even school children at Catechism and Religion Class,is based upon an irrational premise(invisible people are visible) and conclusion( invisible people allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church and with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance of the Gospel through no fault of their own,are visible exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of EENS).
Dr.Fastiggi writes:
Your private judgment that the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office is erroneous is your private judgment. If others (in their private judgments) agree with you that only shows that they agree with you. Such private judgments, however, have no magisterial authority. They remain private judgments
I am basically referring to a philosophical principle and not a new theology.It is the principle which determines the theology.The faculty agree with the philosophical principle that invisible people cannot be visible at the same time. They agree with me that invisible people cannot be visible exceptions to the dogma EENS. So we are all in agreement here.There has been no denial from any one in Detroit on this point not even from Fastiggi, Martin or the Vicar General in the Archdiocese.
So when I choose not to use this strange philosophy I am automatically back to the old theology, the old ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. I do not have to add anything new.I do not have to present a new theology or theory.I simply avoid the irrational premise and I am affirming Tradition.So I am not offering any new or private judgement.
Upon irrational reasoning; an irrational philosophy,  a new theology was created which has been accepted by the popes.The error was included in Vatican Council II (LG 14, LG 16 etc).It is a rupture with the magisterium of the Church before 1949. It is a rupture with missionaries of the 16th century who did not use this irrational philosophical principle.It can be corrected now. It is not a permanent error.
A magisterium inspired with the Holy Spirit would be able to correct the error in 2017.
We simply remain aware of hypothetical cases just being hypothetical when reading Vatican Council II. Then there are no exceptions in the Council to the exclusivist ecclesiology of the past.Pre and post Vatican Council II salvation theology is in agreeement with Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Centers.
So like Fr.Stefano Visintin osb, Robert Fastiggi and Ralph Martin agree that the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance with or without the baptism of water are not exceptions to the dogma EENS in 2017. They are not exceptions to EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century and the past magisterium of the Church.Lionel Andrades

JULY 12, 2017

Ralph Martin and theologians at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary Detroit contradicted by Fr.Stefano Visintin osbn, new Rector at St. Anselm Rome

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/ralph-martin-and-theologians-at-sacred.html



JULY 11, 2017

Image result for Photo of cardinal Muller and Ladaria


Fr.Stefano Visintin osb new Rector University of St. Anselm at loggerheads with Cardinal Ladaria: attack on the New Theology with hard facts

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/frstefano-visintin-osb-new-rector.html


JULY 2, 2017


Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.j made factual errors in two ITC theological papers which were politically correct

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-made-factual.html





JULY 11, 2017

Juan Javier Flores Arcas e Stefano Visintin


Scientist-Benedictine priest who says the baptism of desire was never an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is the new Rector at St. Anselm, Rome

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/scientist-benedictine-priest-who-says.html



 JULY 6, 2017

Pope Francis: SSPX Must Accept Vatican Council II and the New Mass

Church Militant TV repeats the magisterium's false propaganda on Vatican Council II which they have compromised with

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/church-militant-tv-repeats-magisteriums.html