Monday, June 19, 2017

Forth Worth Latin Mass community have to go underground to teach Catechism in secret to children

Image result for Photo of Bishop Olson 2017 Fort Worth with Latin Mass communityImage result for Photo of Bishop Olson at St.Benedict Church

The Latin Mass community at St. Benedict Church in the diocese of Forth Worth, Texas must be aware of a false catechism being taught to their children in the diocese.
They need to home school their children where they will be taught that Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

VISIBLE FOR US BAPTISM OF DESIRE CRISIS IN THE CHURCH TODAY
Just as the Arian crisis lasted some 60 years there has been the visible- for- us- baptism of desire crisis  over some 80 years.
School chidren must be taught that all non Catholics are on the way to Hell unless before death they enter the  Catholic Church.So mission is important.This is the teaching of Vatican Council II( AG 7, LG 14), the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and John 3:5, Mark 16:16.It is not a private opinion or theology.

MAJORITY OF PEOPLE AT THE TIME OF DEATH IN THE WORLD GO TO HELL-VATICAN COUNCIL II
They must be taught that the majority of people in the world at the time of death go to Hell since they die without 'faith and baptism' ( Ad Gentes 7, Cantate Domino Council of Florence 1441 on outside the Church there is no salvation and Math.7:13 Enter through the narrow gate for the road to Hell is wide and most people take it).
Since outside the Church there is no salvation and we do  not know of any one saved outside the Church to be an exception, it is important for the salvation of souls that there is no separation of Church and State and that the Social Reign of Christ the King is proclaimed.

CHILDREN MUST BE SHOWN TWO WAYS OF INTERPRETING VATICAN COUNCIL II
Children must be shown that there can be two ways of interpreting Vatican Council II and you get two different conclusions, two different results.It depends upon the premise, a small irrationality and the meaning of the Council changes.
They must be taught to reason rationally and to interpret Vatican Council II without using the false premise even if every one else is doing so.

FATHERS PETER BYRNE AND KARL PIKUS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO TEACH CHILDREN
This cannot be taught by the two priests Fr. Peter Byrne, FSSP and Fr. Karl Pikus, FSSP since they will not be given permission.They have permission to offer the Extraordinary Form of the Mass.The faculties have been granted by the Bishop of Forth Worth since these FSSP priests  offer the Traditional Latin Mass while rejecting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which is interpreted by them and the bishop as having exceptions.Their concept of salvation is not exclusive and 'restricted' but inclusive and includes non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance etc.

IT HAS TO BE UNDERGROUND
So it is only through private homeschooling or a private Catholic school that these teachings of the Catholic Church can be taught to Catholic children without rejecting Vatican Council II.It would magisterial according to Church documents (Vatican Council II, EENS, Catechism of the Catholic Church 1994  etc) yet it has to be underground.
The present catechesis approved by the bishop and the USCCB is false since the theology is Cushingite, the interpretation uses an irrational premise, the theology is new and innovative and has caused the present crisis in the Church.
With homoschooling in the Fort Worth diocese students can interpret Vatican Council II, EENS, Catechism (1994) etc with rational Feeneyism.

PRIESTS WILL LOSE FACULTIES IF THEY INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH FEENEYISM BEFORE CHILDREN
The FSSP priests cannot officially and in public teach the faith with the theology of Feeneyism, as it was there for the 16th century magisterium, even if they wanted to.The  two FSSP priests have to infer that  hypothetical cases are concrete exceptions to all needing to enter the Church, and the baptism of desire and blood are explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS.So they are given faculties to offer Mass. These faculties were not given for Mass at the Fischer More College.

FISCHER MORE COLLEGE BLOCKED
As I mentioned in a  previous blog post this was not possible at the Fischer More College since it seemed that they affirmed the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries. Bishop Olson wanted them to accept Vatican Council II as a rupture with the past ecclesiology and the old dogmatic interpretation.
Presently most, if not all the children  in the  Latin Mass community at St.Benedict, Forth Worth, Texas infer, unknowingly, that invisible cases are visible exceptions to the traditional theology associated with the Latin Mass.Probably this was the religious formation of their parents and may be even of Bishop Olson.

TAUGHT TO UNDERSTAND THE NICENE CREED CORRECTLY
The children must be taught that when they pray the  Nicene Creed they say, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' .It means that there is only one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins.There are not many known baptisms.So every one needs to be a member of the Catholic Church with the baptism of water and Catholic faith to avoid the fires of Hell and there are no known exceptions of the baptism of desire etc.If they happened they would be followed by the baptism of water since this is Jesus' teaching in John 3:5 and Mark 16:16.

TAUGHT TO INTERPRET MYSTICI CORPORIS, CATECHISMS CORRECTLY
They must be taught, that when they read Mystici Corporis, the Catechism of Pope Pius X or the Catechism of the Council of Trent,whenever there is a reference to being saved in invincible ignorance for example, they must not assume it is a practical exception to EENS.Since the text does not state this.The text does not state that these cases are personally known to us. An invisible case must not be re-interpreted as being visible.

VATICAN COUNCIL II IS FEENEYITE
The children must be taught that they  can attend the Novus Ordo Mass or the Tridentine Rite Mass and still affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.Vatican Council II is Feeneyite.

The children must be shown how they would violate the Principle of Non Contradiction if they assumed invisible people were visible.So Pope Benedict XVI made a mistake in March 2016 when he said that EENS has been contradicted by Vatican Council II. He was referring to a Vatican Council II with an irrational premise.

GO OUT ON MISSION KNOWING EVERYONE IS GOING TO HELL UNLESS THEY ENTER THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

So they must go out on Mission knowing that everyone is going to Hell in 2017 unless they enter the Catholic Church as members.



Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.

Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.

Image result for Photos Letter of the Holy Office 1949Image result for Photos Letter of the Holy Office 1949





The children must be told that cardinals and bishops are not teaching the Catholic Faith today.So they are being taught this in secret.
-Lionel Andrades


JUNE 19, 2017



Latin Mass community in Forth Worth,Texas seek a clarification from Bishop Olson : heresy, mortal sin

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/latin-mass-community-in-forth.html





Latin Mass community in Forth Worth,Texas seek a clarification from Bishop Olson : heresy, mortal sin

 Dr. Michael King, President, Fisher More College was told by Bishop Olson that the Traditional Mass had to be stopped  and that he wanted to save his soul.Since the closure of  the Catholic college in Forth Worth, Texas there is a Latin Mass community.It is St. Benedict parish which offers the Tridentine Rite Mass.
Fr. Peter Byrne, FSSP is the Parochial Vicar and Fr. Karl Pikus, FSSP is titled the Pator on the St.Bendict Church website.1.
They are there, like Bishop Olson, who was appointed by Pope Francis, to help save souls.They have permission to offer the Extraordinary Form of the Mass, unlike the Fisher More College.2.The faculties have been granted by the Bishop of Forth Worth since these FSSP priests  offer the Traditional Latin Mass while rejecting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which is interpreted by them and the bishop as having exceptions.Their concept of salvation is not exclusive and 'restricted' but inclusive and including non Catholics.
Image result for Photo of Bishop Olson 2017 Fort Worth with Latin Mass community
So since the FSSP priests allege hypothetical cases are concrete exceptions to all needing to enter the Church, and the baptism of desire and blood are explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS, as it was understood for example, in the 16th century, they have been given faculties.Fischer More College which was not.
This was not possible at the Fischer More College since it seemed that they were affirming the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries. Bishop Olson wanted them to accept Vatican Council II as a rupture with the past ecclesiology and the old dogmatic interpretation.Instead there were reports that Professor Dudley called for the rejection of Vatican Council II.
Image result for Photo of Bishop Olson 2017 Fort Worth with Latin Mass communityImage result for Photo of Bishop Olson at St.Benedict Church
Prof. Dudley and Bishop Olson and the FSSP priests were assuming Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ignorance) was an explicit exception to all needing to be 'card carrying members of the Church', for salvation.Invisible cases were visible for all of them in that controversy. With this irrational premise Vatican Council II had to emerge as a rupture with Tradition. This was acceptable for Bishop Olson and the FSSP priests but the Council became a  break with Tradition and this conclusion was  rejected by Prof. Dudley.
Now the entire Latin Mass community at St.Benedict in the diocese of Forth Worth, Texas, assume invisible cases are visible exceptions to the traditional theology associated with the Latin Mass.Their theology is inclusive even though they attend the old Latin Mass, which over the centuries was exclusivist in its ecclesiology.
That there are alleged exceptions to the dogma EENS and not every one needs to enter the Catholic Church to avoid Hell would be a new doctrine in the 16th century. It would be a denial of the dogma EENS, defined by three Church Councils.It  would be heresy.Why is this not a Canon Law issue today in Forth Worth ? Why does someone from the Latin Mass community file an appeal with the Diocese Tribunal ?
Since there are alleged exceptions to the dogma EENS for the Latin Mass community  and their FSSP priests they have changed the Nicene Creed. They pray, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' but they mean that there are three known baptisms without the baptism of water, and they include desire, blood and invincible ignorance.This is first class heresy. It is a mortal sin.Someone has to tell them for the good of their souls or as Bishop Olson puts it ,in ' pastoral solicitude '.
The community too must clarify this. Ask the bishop and the two priests, if for them there are three or more known baptisms or only one.Then post their statement on the Internet.We know that the baptism of desire is not visible or known in personal cases.We can administer the baptism of water but we cannot give any one the baptism of desire.
Possibly if some one brought this to the attention of the FSSP priests they would say but the church has always believed in the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.Then it  needs to be pointed out to them that this is not the issue.We do not have to reject hypothetical baptism of desire or theoretically being saved in invincible ignorance.The issue is that  the baptism of desire etc can be considered visible or invisible and the missionaries of the 16th century considered these cases invisible while the Forth Worth community and the whole diocese considers them visible in the flesh.If they were not visible in the flesh how could they be exceptions to the dogma EENS( Feeneyite)?!
So they re-interpret Mystici Corporis and the Council of Trent. Whenever there is a reference to being saved in invincible ignorance for example, they assume it is a practical exception to EENS even though the text does not state this. In other words an invisible case is re-interpreted as being visible.
This is deception.
So now they all attend the Traditional Latin Mass at St.Benedict Church while 1)rejecting the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite) and replacing it with some form of EENS(Cushigite).2)hey all reject Feeneyite Vatican Council II and assume that Cushingism is the only possible interpretation. For the 'good of their souls' the bishop and the two FSSP priests will not explain to the whole community the difference between the two.

The bishop and the FSSP priests do not tell the community that the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance must no more be considered exceptions to EENS.The congregation must be told thathey can attend the Novus Ordo Mass or the Tridentine Rite Mass and still affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII made an objective mistake. If the popes since Pius XII assume invisible people are visible then it still is an objective mistake, even if the person is a pope.So Feeneyism is still traditional theology after Vatican Council II.Vatican Council II is Feeneyite.
At the time of the Fischer More College controversy the bishop was accused of breaking Canon Law.
Canon Law is still an issue.
How can a bishop and the two FSSP priests reject the dogma EENS defined by three Church Councils ? Why do they not affirm the dogma EENS as it was interpreted in the 16th century? Why must they assume invisible people are visible exceptions to all needing to be members of the Church for salvation.How can all these innovations be taught by juridical persons? It violates Canon Law.
How can the bishop and the two FSSP priests and the whole Latin Mass community affirm Vatican Council II only with  an irrational premise? This is irrational, non traditional and heretical.This is a Canon Law issue for a bishop.
How can the meaning of the Nicene Creed be changed for the whole Latin Mass community there ? This is first class heresy.The bishop and priests need to recant. In their present condition they have no right to to offer Holy Mass.
When +Olson released his statement and the copy of the letter, he revealed that, "as part of the development of an overall pastoral plan," the diocese is considering establishing "an independent parish devoted to the Extraordinary Form and entrusted to capable priests". I'm sure the news will be greeted with great skepticism from the "help, help, we're being repressed" crowd..".
The ' independent parish devoted to the Extraordinary Form and entrusted to capable priests' is as heretical today as it was   when the Bishop helped sink the Fischer More College.The issue is 'ideology' as Pope Francis would put it. The Franciscans of the Immaculate were 'ideological' and so the Traditional Latin Mass was banned. The FSSP is not ideological. They affirm Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and reject EENS ( Feeneyite). So they can have the Old Mass. Really it is the Old Mass with the liturgy, vestments, rituals and language but without the theology and doctrines of the past.It is not Apostolic.
-Lionel Andrades

1
https://fwdioc.org/parish-finder/st-benedict?send_to=%2Fparish-finder%3F615_browse_field_id%3D288%26615_browse_filter%3DS


2
A letter from the bishop of Fort Worth, TX, dated February 24, 2014, to Mr. Michael King, president of Fisher More College, was leaked to theRorate Caeli blog; the letter from Bishop Michael Olson states: 
1. You do not have permission to have the public celebration of the Extraordinary Form of the Mass at the Chapel of Fisher More College.  This includes Sundays and weekdays.  The weekly celebration of the Extraordinary Form is available to the faithful every Sunday at St. Mary of the Assumption Catholic Church in Fort Worth. 
2. You may only have the celebration of the Mass in the Ordinary Form by priests who explicitly have faculties for such celebration as granted by me as the Bishop of Fort Worth….
I make these norms out of my pastoral solicitude and care for the students of Fisher-More College as well as for your own soul.  I urge you to comply with them. 
3.
http://impracticalcatholic.blogspot.it/2014/08/the-end-of-fisher-more-college-fight.html#.WUfdutSLRkg

Italian Military Ordinariate "Allows" Communion for Remarried Divorcees


Italian Military Ordinariate "Allows" Communion for Remarried Divorcees

The Military Ordinariate in Italy, which is immediately subject to the Holy See, "allows" Communion for remarried divorcees in direct contradiction to the New Testament and Catholic doctrine. This break with the Faith of the Church is sanctioned in …
https://gloria.tv/article/Y6B9RMpuMgvX2bdTK7w3uSDB3

Pope Francis Leads Church Into "Doctrinal Anarchy", "Division"


Pope Francis Leads Church Into "Doctrinal Anarchy", "Division"

02:58
Doctrinal Anarchy: Edward Pentin points out in the National Catholic Register to a "doctrinal anarchy" in the Church as bishops advance contradictory positions on Amoris Laetitia, which the Vaticanista Marco Tosatti calls "Confusionis Laetitia". Pentin notices, that after Amoris Laetitia receiving Communion is allowed in one country and iws forbidden in another. Quote, "Thus your geographical location becomes the determining factor on whether you must adhere to traditional Church teaching and practice, or not." He quotes Monsignor Nicola Bux, "The first effect on the Church of such 'doctrinal anarchy' is division.”

Indifference? Charlie Gard is a nine-month-old English boy, who suffers from a rare genetic condition. Against the will of his parents the British High Court decided to take Charlie off life support. The Italian journalist Antonio Socchi comments, "If this were about parents, who wanted to get their child off life-support, the media would have campaigned in favour of their free choice. Why are there no big headlines for parents who want to care for their son? Not even Pope Bergoglio says anything. Indifferent."

Not Indifferent: German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who visited Pope Francis on Saturday said, that Francis had encouraged her to work to preserve the Paris climate accord despite the United States’ decision to withdraw. Merkel met with the pope for about 40 minutes in the Apostolic Palace.

Leftwing Church Without Future: U.S. born Maryknoll Father Miguel D’Escoto, a former Communist minister of Nicaragua, has died. In 2014, Pope Francis revoked his suspension as a priest he incurred in 1985 together with three other Communist priests. D'Escoto's death was mourned by the two Socialist countries Peru and Cuba. Left-wing political activity of many priests in Nicaragua did not help the Church. Since 1970 the Catholic population in Nicaragua has dropped by 43 per cent.

Deacon Edward Schaefer is expected to repeat the doctrinal and theological confusion of Fischer More College


Image result for Photo of Deacon Edward Schaefer

There are so many issues which Deacon Edward Schaefer has not clarified.
1.What will be the position of the Collegium  Sanctorum Angelorum(CSA) on Vatican Council II? Will they affirm Vatican Council II as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and Tradition in general ?
2.Will they correct the diocese and the Vatican and ask them to affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) ?
3.Will the CSA affirm the Syllabus of Errors and the past ecclesiology based on EENS( Feeneyite)?  So they reject the new ecumenism based on known salvation outside the Catholic Church?
4.Will the students be taught that all non Catholics need to formally convert into the Church in 2017-2019 with 'faith and baptism' (Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II) to avoid Hell? This is Deacon Edward Schaefer's personal belief on salvation?
5.Or will they be taught that all non Catholics are welcome to enter the Church with 'faith and baptism' but the Church is not always necessary for salvation, since there is known salvation outside the Church?
6.Will the students at CSA be taught that all Protestants, Orthodox Christians, Pentecostals and Evangelicals and other Christians  need to be members of the Church with Catholic faith(AG 7) since outside the Church there is no salvation( Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441)?
7.Or will they be taught that all Christians do not need to enter the Catholic Church with Catholic faith, since there is known salvation outside the Church and the dogma EENS( Feeneyite) is contradicted?
8.When students recite the Nicene Creed will they have to understand, like at SSPX seminaries, that 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' really  means 'I believe in three or more known baptisms and they exclude the baptism of water.They are the baptisms of desire, blood and invincible ignorance.Also seeds of the Word(AG 11), elements of sanctification and truth(LG 8) in other religions etc.'
9.Or will students be taught that there in only one baptism, it is the baptism of water, it is needed by every body with no known exceptions, for salvation?
10.Is Lumen Gentium 16( invincible ignorance/good conscience) an exception to the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite) or being a hypothetical case it is irrelevant to EENS ? Wikipedia says LG 16 is an exception to EENS, is this correct for the CSA?
11.Did Pope Benedict XVI in the Avvenire March 2016 interview make a mistake when he said that EENS was no more like it was missionaries in the 16th century since there was a development with Vatican Council II? Was he wrong?
12.There can be an interpretation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) also without the irrational premise, with Feeneyism?This will be taught to the students at the CSA?
Image result for Photo of Deacon Edward Schaefer
Deacon Edward Schaefer is seeking funds and is projecting the CSA as a traditionalist college.He has not clarified if the Latin Mass( Extraordinary Form)  is Feeneyite or Cushingite,in harmony with the 16th century magisterium or a rupture,in its theology.
Also we do not know his personal beliefs as a Catholic on this issue( 12 points) while he has not commented on blog posts ( EucharistandMission) over the last few years.
Image result for Photo of Fisher More College
This was all the doctrinal and theological confusion at the Fischer More College and he was no help at that time.The faculty did not know the difference between Feeneyism and Cushingism and Bishop Olson at Forth Worth was not going to tell them, if he knew about it.
Image result for Photo of Fr.Nicholas Bruner and Robert SungenisImage result for Photo of Robert Sungenis
The Fischer More College had Fr.Nicholas Gruner and Robert Sungenis as speakers.They would affirm EENS( Feeneyite) based on the text of the dogma defined by three Church Councils.But they would also theologically negate it at the same time.They would assume invisible for us  baptism of desire,blood and invincible ignorance, all are known without the baptism of water and they are visible exceptions to the dogma.So there was known salvation outside the Church for them, theologically,there were practical exceptions based on hypothetical cases.This is the confusion that is expected to be repeated by Edward Schaefer.-Lionel Andrades


Corpus Christi procession Sunday instead of Thursday- secularists and Satan pleased

The Holy Father decided to transfer the Mass of Corpus Christi and the Procession from the Lateran Basilica to St. Mary Major from Thursday – when it has always been celebrated – to Sunday... I think that that was not a particularly good decision: Rome needs the witness on a weekday.  I am sure that the Left is pleased with this new development...  Alas.- Fr.John Zuhlsdorf 1
Image result for Foto Gesu al Centro giovane a Roma
The Gesu al Centro Catholic youth a few years back were stopped by the secular administration in Rome from witnessing to their faith.No street evangelisation.The annual gathering of youth was organised by the Rome Vicariate. There is no 'diversity' and 'tolerance' here for the Left and Satan.
GESU AL CENTRO PONTE MILVIO 2011.wmv

However there is freedom for the Leftist media to attack the teachings of the Catholic Church in Italy.Also in selection for jobs, non Catholics in general are given prefence over Catholics in Rome, under the equal opportunity slogan.The freedom of religion and worship ,which was there a few years back is being taken away by Satan through the Left, who represent him.The Catholic population is being replaced in Italy, there are pro homosexual and abortion laws, pornography is widespread in Rome there are also cinemas specialising in only adult movies. This is all the result of the separation of Church and State and the non separation of secularism and state.When the laws are not directed to God as he is known in the Catholic Church, they are directed to Satan as he is supported by the Masons and the Jewish Left.
-Lionel Andrades

1.
http://wdtprs.com/blog/2017/06/we-quickly-turn-the-page-looking-for-novelty-while-unable-to-retain-memories/

2017.06.18 Mass on the Solemn Feast of Corpus Christi