Sunday, May 14, 2017

Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate sign the doctrinal preamble:Vatican Council II is not the real issue







The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate and the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) must go ahead and sign the doctrinal preamble since the real issue is not Vatican Council II. I repeat the real issue is not Vatican Council II.
Understand this.It is very important.Everything  that I have to stay begins with this passage in blue.

The real issue is : is there an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus? Is there someone known in the past or present who will be an exception to all needing to be members of the Church in 2017 for salvation? Do we know someone who will be saved outside the visible limits of the Church;without faith and baptism ? Is there known salvation outside the Catholic Church among the Muslims, Jews, Hindus,Protestants,Orthdox Christians,atheists and others? This would be the issue when you, for example, affirm Vatican Council II.
Now reason out.
Even if there were such cases known to God over the last 100 years they would not be an exception to EENS since they would not be visible and known for us human beings.They would not be personally seen and known to human beings.Zero cases of somebody are not exceptions to the dogma EENS said John Martignoni the Catholic apologist who has a program on EWTN TV.If someone is not there he cannot be an exception to anything.The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are not exceptions to EENS says Fr. Stefano Visintin osb, Vice Rector and former Dean of Theology, University of St. Anselm, Rome.Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson agrees with him.

So if the Good Thief on the Cross died allegedly without the baptism of water it is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2017. If there is a St.Emerentiana in the past who died without the baptism of water in the Church and is declared a saint, she is not an exception to the dogma EENS in 2017. Since, for there to be an exception to the dogma in the present times(2017,1965 or1949 ) the person would have to be there.The person would have to exist.The person would have to be known by name. A person who does not exist in 2017 cannot be relevant or an exception to the dogma EENS.
If there is a box or apples and there is one orange there then the orange is an exception since it is different but also since it exists there in that box.It had to be there in the box to be an exception.
 Similarly a baptism of desire case cannot be an exception or relevant to the dogma since it is an invisible case for us. If someone was saved as such it would only be known to God. A possibility in the past cannot be an exception to the dogma EENS in 2017.This is all basic philosophy.Simple reasoning.Yet the two popes and all their cardinals and bishops will say there are exceptions....The SSPX and FSSP priests will say that St.Emerentiana died without the baptism of water a long time back and she is in Heaven, and she is an exception to the dogma EENS.So every one does not need to be a member of the Church in 2017 is there conclusion.
The entire philosophy and theology in Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 is based on this error.Once you are aware that the Church Fathers, at Vatican Council II assumed people who did not exist were exceptions to the dogma EENS you see through Vatican Council II.The Council is full of this philosophical mistake.
So when Cardinal Braz de Avez asks the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate to affirm Vatican Council II it must be kept in mind that he wants them to assume invisible people are relevant and exceptions to the dogma EENS.In this way Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with EENS.
Similarly when Archbishop Guido Pozzo asks the SSPX to sign a doctrinal preamble he  interpretsVatican Council II assuming hypothetical and theoretical cases are objective and seen in 2017.So Vatican Council II in this way becomes a rupture with the dogma EENS , as it was interpreted  over the centuries.Guido Pozzo would be saying there is known salvation outside the Church even when he does not know and cannot know any one saved as such outside the Church.
So once this false reasoning is noted it should be clear that Vatican Council II can be accepted by assuming invisible cases are just invisible, hypothetical cases are just hypothetical and so they are not exceptions to the old ecclesiology of the Church. In this way Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the past.
So the issue is not Vatican Council II any more. Vatican Council II was never the issue.
Go ahead and sign the document they want .Know that the real issue is extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the use or omission of the false premise( invisible cases are visible).
So affirm Vatican Council II, avoid the false premise and affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century. Ask Cardinal Braz de Avez to do the same.Ask Archbishop Guido Pozzo and the Conferences of Catholic Bishops to do the same.Ask Pope Benedict to do likewise.Tell him that in March 2016 when he said in the daily Avvenire that the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century he was assuming that  invisible and hypothetical cases (LG 16 etc) mentioned in Vatican Council II, were visible and known in 2016. This was a rupture between faith and reason.It was a philosophical error which he needs to correct.
So it is important to go back to the original blue passage in this report.It is at the centre of what I keep writing  so much about. We have found the missing link as to what makes Vatican Council II a rupture with Tradition.What precisely causes the hermeneutic of rupture or continuity with Tradition ? Now we know!!
-Lionel Andrades





FEBRUARY 13, 2017



Why must the Franciscans Sisters of the Immaculate and all Catholic religious communities have to accept BOD and I.I as being visible,objective,explicit and seen in the flesh in personal cases, for them to be accepted by Pope Francis and Cardinal Braz de Avez?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/02/why-must-franciscans-sisters-of.html


FEBRUARY 9, 2017


There is a wrong inference as a theme in Vatican Council II , and the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate have to accept it : Catholic media silent

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/02/there-is-wrong-inference-as-theme-in.html



December 27, 2016

Imagine a major Church Council making wrong inferences as a theme. This was Vatican Council II.The secret is out and no one wants to talk about it

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/imagine-major-church-council-making.html

Pope Francis' doctrinal error is magisterial and being forced upon Franciscans of the Immaculate priests

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/02/pope-francis-doctrinal-error-is.html


February 6, 2017
Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate Pope Francis and Cardinal Avez want you to accept heresy and mortal sin.Reject it. 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/02/franciscan-sisters-of-immaculate-pope.html


February 4, 2017

Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate protest against Pope Francis and Card.Avez's absurd and strange theology

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/02/the-franciscan-sisters-of-immaculate.html

Pope Francis confirms : SSPX cannot interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyite theology and the hermeneutic of continuity : it would be 'triumphalism'

Credit: Alan Holdren/CNA.Pope Francis has confirmed that the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) has to accept Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents with irrational Cushingism theology for an agreement. They cannot accept Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents interpreted with Feeneyite, rational and traditional theology, otherwise it will be labelled with the Masonic buzz word 'triumphalism'.1
Image result for Photos of SSPX
FAKE NEWS VERSION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II OBLIGATORY FOR ALL RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES
All Catholic religious communities, including the SSPX have to accept the fake news version of Vatican Council II to be accepted by a heretical magisterium.
RUPTURE WITH SYLLABUS OF ERRORS OBLIGATORY
The two popes use an irrational premise(invisible people are visible) to interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.In this way there is a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
Image result for Photos of SSPX and Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate

SIGN THE DOCTRINAL PREAMBLE :INTERPRET THE COUNCIL WITH RATIONAL PHILOSOPHY
It is important for the SSPX and Franciscans of the Immaculate to sign the doctrinal preamble accepting Vatican Council II in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century.Affirm Vatican Council II  with Feeneyite theology and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.Reject a Vatican Council II in which hypothetical cases(LG 16,LG 8 etc) are assumed to be objective exceptions to all needing faith and baptism for salvation in the Catholic Church.
The should affirm the Council with rational philosophyi.e invisible people cannot be explicit exceptions to the exclusivist ecclesiology of the past.So there are no practical exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to the traditional ecclesiology of the Church, the 16th century version.
AFFIRM RATIONAL PROFESSION OF VOWS
Also during the Profession of Faith and Vows affirm a Nicene Creed which means, 'I believe in one baptism, one known baptism, it is the baptism of water.There are no known cases of the baptism of desire with or without the baptism of water,there are also no personally known cases of someone being saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church' Reject a Nicene Creed which means,'I believe in three or more known baptisms that they include desire,blood, invincible ignorance, a good conscience(LG 16), seeds of the Word(AG 11), elements of sanctification and truth in other religions(LG 5) etc'.
-Lionel Andrades
 
1.
Nicolas Seneze (La Croix): Thanks, Holy Father. We’re returning from Fatima for which the Fraternity of St. Pius X has a great devotion and much is said about an agreement that would give an official statute to the Fraternity in the Church. Some even imagined that there would be an announcement today… Holiness, do you think that this agreement is possible in a short timeframe? And, what are the obstacles still? And what is the sense of this reconciliation for you? And, will it be the triumphant return for faithful who have shown what it means to be truly Catholic or what? 
Pope Francis: I would toss out any form of triumphalism. None. Some days ago, the Feria Quarta of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, their meeting - the call it the Feria Quarta, because it’s the fourth Wednesday - studied a document and the document still hasn’t reached me, the study of the document. This is the first. Secondly, the current relations are fraternal. Last year, I gave a license for confession to all of them, also a form of jurisdiction for marriages, but even before the problems, the cases they had, for example, had to be resolved by the Doctrine of the Faith. The Doctrine of the Faith carries them forward. For example, abuses. The cases of abuse, they brought them to us, also to the Penitentiary. Also the reduction to the lay state of a priest, they bring to us. The relations are fraternal. With Msgr. Fellay I have a good rapport. I’ve spoken many times… I don’t like to hurry things. Walk. Walk. Walk. And then we’ll see. For me, it’s not an issue of winners and losers, it’s an issue of brothers who must walk together, looking for a formula to make steps forward. 

Medugorje - Fruits of 'the telegraph office'


Regarding the presumed present appearances, the relationship presents its doubts. I personally am more evil, I prefer the Virgin Mother than the Virgin who becomes in charge of a telegraph office and sends a message every day. And these alleged appearances are not so valuable: I follow this as personal opinion. -Pope Francis on Our Lady at Medugorje
 
FRUITS OF THE TELEGRAPH OFFICE
 
 
 
ITALIAN GIRL RAFFAELLA WHO WAS BLIND HAD HER SIGHT RESTORED IN A MIRACLE AT MEDUGORJE
 

 

 

Lame girl was healed during apparition in Medjugorje http://www.medjugorje.ws/en/articles/silvia-busi-healed-in-medjugorje/ http://www.maryslandmovie.org/project/silvia-buso-padua/


 
Medugorje : Irish priest with cancer healed completely
 


AUGUST 7, 2015

Medugorje tour leader in Lebanon becomes a priest and accompanies the pilgrims this week

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/08/meduegorje-tour-leader-in-lebanon.html

 
 
 


 
 
 
June 8, 2016
 
Hingham father writes about miracle pilgrimage (Boston Globe)
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/regionals/south/2014/08/09/hingham-father-writes-about-miracle-pilgrimage-that-saved-him-from-metastatic-kidney-cancer/dwpSSOzZFqywaG3SkL9o3J/story.html

Video : Arthur Boyle Cancer Story at St. Agatha Parish (Youtube) https://youtu.be/lZktbnvBFw0

 
 
Medjugorje - Miracle of the Sun - May 2010 (1)

 
Miracle of Sun at Medjugorje - www.queridosfilhos.com.br
 
Sun Miracles captured on video!! (Medjugorje, Herzegovina) [Full Length]
 
June 28, 2016
MedjugorjeApparition Hill

The Silence of the Birds: the Powerful Experiences of an Atheist Doctor and Notre Dame’s Basketball Team in Medjugorje

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/the-silence-of-birds-powerful.html
 
Miracolo a Medjugorje - Dovete vedere questo per credere ... incredibile !!!
https://youtu.be/9tZ6mIeFwC8
 
MedjugorjevisionariesApparition
 

August 9, 2015

Medugorje inspires girl to become Carmelite nun in cloistered order.Some pilgrims have become priests

(20:55) She took the name of Sister Pia of the Queen of Peace her
 mission is also to pray for Our Lady's intentions  says
 Terezija Gaziova.Some ( pilgrims) have become priests.

-L.A



-Lionel Andrades
 

Mancano 1 settimana alla Marcia ! Sei pronto ?


Mancano 1 settimana alla Marcia ! Sei pronto ? 

Il più importante evento pro-life dell'anno è  alle
porte ! Mancano ormai pochi giorni.
Ti ricordiamo che l'appuntamento per la VII

 edizione della Marcia per la Vita è alle 
ore 15.00 a piazza della Repubblica.



Marcia per la Vita Roma 20
Maggio 2017
https://youtu.be/ZR9UNCMy0Kc
 

 


Guido Pozzo needs to apologize to the SSPX


Vatican Official: SSPX Must Sign Doctrinal Declaration

Archbishop Guido Pozzo must be told that at excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre ,Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger  interpreted Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition, a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the baptism of desire.He did this when he had a choice.
Then in March 2016 he again interpreted Vatican Council II as a rupture with the dogma EENS.He said EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries of the 16th century.There was a development of the dogma for him, with Vatican Council II.
So for Pope Benedict the CDF and Ecclesia Dei, Vatican Council II is a rupture with the Church teachings over the centuries.So why should the SSPX or any Catholic  religious community accept this 'fake news' version of Vatican Council II?
The SSPX should be apologised to for the CDF's excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre.Since if Cardinal Ratzinger at that time interpreted Vatican Council II with Feeneyism, the Council would affirm the exclusivist ecclesiology of the past and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope IX.Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with Tradition for Archbishop Lefebvre.
Pope Benedict should also apologise for not affirming Vatican Council II with Feeneyism in March 2016. Then there would not have been 'a development of the dogma' with Vatican Council II.
The SSPX must now be allowed to sign a doctrinal preamble affirming Vatican Council II in accord with the exclusivist ecclesiology of the past.Since invisible cases of the baptism of desire and blood  and being saved in invincible ignorance are no more considered explicit exceptions  to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS.This is common sense. It is also traditional theology.The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feenet case and a correction must be made by the CDF on behalf of the 1949 CDF.
Also the many priests of the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, who offer the Traditional Latin Mass, should be allowed to sign a doctrinal preamble affirming Vatican Council II in harmony with the dogma EENS, as it was known to the magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century.
Archbishop Guido Pozzo himself needs to endorse Vatican Council II in harmony with the dogma EENS as it was known to the 16th century missionaries and clarify that Pope Benedict made a heretical mistake in March 2016 in the interview to Avvenire.This is also the heretical interpretation of bishops conferences throughout the world whose approval of the SSPX is being sought.
Guido Pozzo and Pope Francis need to apologise to the SSPX, since at first they told the SSPX that they can be given a personal prelature  without accepting Vatican Council II being a condition. They then spring a surprise on them and change their plans.-Lionel Andrades

MAY 13, 2017


Archbishop Guido Pozzo issues 'fake news' on Vatican Council II and the SSPX http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/05/archbishop-guido-pozzo-issues-fake-news.html


MAY 13, 2017



Abp.Pozzo is specious on SSPX confusion : does not differentiate between Vatican Council II Feeneyite and Cushingite, without the irrational premise or with it

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/05/abppozzo-is-specioushe-does-not.html



MAY 13, 2017

Featured Image

Franciscans of the Immaculate could ask to sign a doctrinal document affirming Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma outside the church there is no salvation

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/05/franciscans-of-immaculate-could-ask-to.html


MAY 12, 2017

Image result for Photo of Bishop Bernard Fellay meeting  Pope Francis

SSPX-Vatican reconciliation fails once again

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/05/sspx-vatican-reconciliation-fails-once.html


APRIL 27, 2017


Müller is covering up Bergoglio's heresies

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/muller-is-covering-up-bergoglios.html


Parish priests will not allow the Catechism to be interpreted with the theology of Feeneyism. They could be suspended or transferred
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/parish-priests-will-not-allow-catechism.html



 APRIL 24, 2017


Until Fr.Zuhlsdorf or a bishop affirms the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism lay Catholics have to affirm the Faith independently and with the opposition of the local Cushingite bishop

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/until-frzuhlsdorf-or-bishop-affirms.html



APRIL 24, 2017


Tracey Rowland, Fr. John Zuhlsdorf and Bishop Morlino in the Diocese of Madison, USA are 'doing theology' with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/tracy-rowland-fr-john-zuhlsdorf-and.html



 APRIL 21, 2017


There is a false theology in the Catholic Church and it is less than a hundred years old : 'the dogma will be lost' Our Lady at Fatima prophesied 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/there-is-false-theology-in-catholic.html




Pope Benedict XVI at 90 : theological deception and compromise

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/pope-benedict-xvi-at-90-theological.html