Monday, April 24, 2017

Until Fr.Zuhlsdorf or a bishop affirms the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism lay Catholics have to affirm the Faith independently and with the opposition of the local Cushingite bishop

I have mentioned in a previous post 1 that Vatican Council II, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995) can be interpreted with the theology of Cushingism or Feeneyism.Fr. Z refuses to address this point.

Similarly over the years I have mentioned that the Catechism of the Council of Trent, the Baltimore Catechism and the  Catechism of St.Pius X can also be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism and the conclusion would be different.Fr. Z refuses to address this point.
Liberal theologians have interpreted all these documents with Cushingism and they have been supported by the magisterium. This was official since 1949.It was when the new theology, Cushingite theology was officially accepted.It was also the theology of Vatican Council II.
However the liberals at Vatican Council may be were not aware that there was a weak point with Cushingism, there was a built- in error. Once it was avoided the interpretation  again becomes traditional Feeneyite theology.
Now we know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism and so the Council would be in harmony with all the Catechisms interpreted only with Feeneyism.This would mean that the ecclesiology of the Church on mission, ecumenism, inter-religious dialogue, non separation of Church and State and the theology of the liturgy would be the same before and after Vatican Council II.The ecclesiology would be the same on faith( salvation) and morals without the subjectivism -error.Subjectivism( being able to judge the un-judgeable as an exception to the general rule on faith and morals) is the basis of Cushingism as a philosophy and theology.An irrational premise is used to elicit a non traditional conclusion and this non traditional conclusion is now considered a magisterial interpretation of the Catechism( 1995).This error is supported by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf.Fr. Z refuses to address this point over the last few years -L.A

From Fr. John Zuhlsdorf's blog WDTPS

Are you anxious, upset, confused about the Church today? Wherein Fr. Z rants.

Saint_Jerome_Writing-Caravaggio_(1605-6)_detail
In this time of confusion over doctrine and praxis, many people ask me in email what they can do either to maintain equilibrium, or else to “be the maquis”, as it were, and join the resistance against the liberal undermining of our Catholic cult, code, creed and identity.
Lionel: Fr.Zuhlsdorf interprets the Catechism with Cushingism.He is a liberal.
_____________________

Yes, I think that there should be a “resistance”, though not every one can “resist” in the same way.
The first step is, of course, to examine your conscience and GO TO CONFESSION.  Only after that can you determine your best course of action.
Some of you must be engaged in this struggle, either because of your ecclesiastical office or because you have the spirit and the firepower upstairs to engage effectively.  Some of you might engage on a wider scale, though your immediate concern is for your family and close circle.  Some of you must not engage actively because these debates and current news upsets you spiritually and brings only confusion fear and anger to your lives.
You have to figure out on your own who you are, though I’ll remind priests out there that their souls are on the line if they either go the way of undermining cult, code and creed or, tepid, shrink from the line of fire and cower in a hole.
That said, there is one thing that everyone can and should do.
Read, review, study the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Lionel: Yes study it - but interpret it with the theology of Feeneyism. Avoid the Cushingism of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger.
_______________________
US HERE – UK HERE (There are many editions.  Look around.)
I am a huge fan of Kindles (US HERE – UK HERE), but you should also have the BOOK, the material volume which you can hold in your hand and write in.  Get the book, which you can flip around in and hold spots in with a couple fingers as you cross check.
Lionel:However when you read CCC 846 Outside the Church there is no salvation, interpret it with Feeneyism.Be aware of the Cushingite reasoning.Also when you read CCC 1257 The Necessity of Baptism, interpret it with Feeneyism. Know that there are no known case of someone saved without 'faith and baptism' in the Church 'since God is not limited to the Sacraments'.Similarly, even though we accept theoretically that all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church this is not an exception to the interpretation of the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).
However Cardinal Ratzinger assumed that being saved in invincible ignorance etc excluded the baptism of water in the Church and it referred to known people .So he inferred that  invincible ignorance was an exception to the dogma EENS.So in the Catechism of the Catholic Church,  CCC 846 does not directly say every one with no exception needs to be a member of the Church for salvation. In CCC 846 with the new theology, an allowance is made for invisible cases being actually visible. Then it is inferred that since visible cases of the baptism of desire, blood and invincible ignorance are exceptions to EENS, 'all who are saved are saved through...').
 So Cardinal Ratzinger says all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church and blesses Cushingite theology which was approved by Rahner, Kung,Congar etc.
This is the new theology, it is Cushingite theology, based on an irrationality i.e known cases of being saved in invincible ignorance outside the visible bounds of the Church; without being a member of the Catholic Church.This is the missing link which we now have discovered. We now know what causes Pope Benedict's hermeneutic of rupture or continuity. Perhaps the pope did not know about it himself.
_________________________________
Read it.  Pick it up. Read portions every day.
St. John Paul II called the CCC, “a sure reference point”.
Ignorance of the content of the Faith, the fides quae creditur, has lead to enormous problems. For one thing, it has turned lots of nominal Catholics into the dupes of liberals who are undermining the Church.
Lionel: Ignorance of the theology of Feeneyism and Cushingism has created many liberals, including Fr.Z.
With Cushingism he theologically supports the new ecumenism and inter- religious dialogue,the non separation of Church and State, mission based on salvation for those who do not know about the Church and so all do not need to enter the Church in general but only those who know and who are not in ignorance.
Since there is known salvation outside the Church for Fr. Z he supports inter-faith marriages.They are not adultery for him if the priest or bishop ( who does not believe in the dogma EENS, Feeneyite) gives a dispensation.Since there is known salvation outside the Church for Fr.Zuhlsdorf, he affirms the new ecclesiology.This is the new theology at the Traditional Latin Mass and the Novus Ordo Mass for him.He supports the separation of Church and State since a non Catholic can be saved in his religions so why does every one need to enter the Catholic Church when there is known salvation outside the Chruch?.He cannot affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation since every one does not need to be a Catholic for salvation.There are known exceptions in 2017 for him.
___________________________________
Possession of a copy of the CCC, and a solid familiarity with it, can be both shield and sword in the defense of your Catholic Faith.
Lionel: How can you defend the faith with Cushingism ? With the new theology you are part of the problem.Without the new theology they will persecute you and you will become part of the resistance.
To be in the resistance just remember to use a theology which is rational.Discuss how Cushingism is an irrational and nonsense theology and so you refuse to accept it. May  be it will touch the conscience of your parish priest or bishop.
_____________________________________
Say you are living in the Diocese of Libville, where Most Rev. Fatty McButterpants
has gone off into doctrinal la la land.  You are stuck in the burbs and you can’t always drive for two hours with your kids to Tall Tree Circle were Msgr. Zuhlsdorf has the TLM.  Instead, you fulfill your Sunday obligation at the clustered, “Engendering Togetherness Community of Welcome” where Fr. Bruce Hugalot is busily churning out self-affirmed pantheists through sketchy preaching and dubious sacraments.

You, on the other hand, have the Catechism of the Catholic Church well in hand.
Lionel: The liberals also have the Catechism in their hand and they interpret it with Cushingism.
_______________________________________
Ignorance of the Faith makes you a potential victim of the predations of the libs.
Lionel: Agreed.On the other hand if you interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church, with Feeneyism, then the liberal magisterium can punish you.
Can you picture Fr. Z affirming the Catechism of the Catholic Church without the irrational premise, without Cushingism while the Vatican uses the false premise and conclusion?
_________________________________________
Tell me:
What would you think of a school where, in its basic chemistry courses, neither the teacher or the the students learn the Periodic Table of Elements?
Lionel:He's a Cushingite in another profession or vocation.
________________________________________
What would you think of the school where neither the teachers nor the students in math courses know Multiplication Tables?
Lionel: They had to learn the historical date of their profession and not invent new data, or change the Logarithm Charts and then offer it to everybody.
_______________________________________
Would you go to a doctor who never undertook to learn basic anatomy?  A pharmacist who didn’t learn the basics of drug actions and interactions?
Lionel: It would be like going to learn the Catholic  Faith at the wrong place.It  is like a profession or service, where they teach errors,  to stay in business.
_________________________________________
How about a barber who can’t cut hair?
Lionel: How about a Catholic who proclaims the Good News with exceptions to what Jesus taught. He bases his exceptions on modern day subjectivism, the reasoning of the new theology ?
____________________________________________
Would you hire a plumber who doesn’t own a wrench?
Lionel: What if there was a good plumber who had an agenda ? What if he was working knowingly or unknowingly for a known mafia? What if he was known to tell lies professionally or otherwise? Would you call him to your house, especially if there was a choice in the area ?
_________________________________________________
See what I mean?
Another question:
Would you respect any of the above in their fields?
The CCC puts us on a sure footing.
Lionel: Yes, only if it is interpreted with Feeneyism.
___________________________
And this is for you libs out there:
If in reading the CCC, you find teachings which you don’t agree with, not just which puzzle you but rather which you truly reject, then there’s the door.  G’bye!  Extra omnes!  Get. Out.  There are lots of “faith communities” out there with little or no doctrine where you can be right at home.  Go be happy somewhere else and leave us alone.
Lionel: It is the libs who interpret the Catechism with Cushingism and so their conclusion is non traditional. Then they tell the traditionalists that they are in heresy and schism for not accepting the Catechism of the Catholic Church, interpreted with Cushingism and as a  rupture with Tradition.
Presently it works the other way.The Catechism is considered liberal when it really is not.It is the liberals who wave it.
_______________________________
When you hear from the pulpit or some other place a dubious notion that rings an alarm bell, check your CCC.   Then you can decide to ask Bp. McButterpants or Fr. Hugalot what gives.  “You said X, but the Catechism says Y.  What’s with that?”
That’s not everyone’s role or cuppa, of course.   Many people will choose not to engage and, for those many, that’s a good choice.  Others, however….
Along with the Catechism of the Catholic Church you can review the always dependable Roman Catechism, the The Roman CatechismThe Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests.  Fathers… note the title.  Do you have a copy?  You should.  You should know this stuff like a mathematician knows his tables.  It’s basic.  And it’s not optional.
Lionel: Yes and they should all be interpreted with Feeneyism.
Where there is a reference, for example in the Catechism of Pope Pius X, to being saved in invincible ignorance, do not assume that these are known cases. Do not assume that these are  personally known  people saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. There are no such people, past or present.This was the mistake or ruse of the liberal theologians in Boston and Baltimore.They would interpret the past Catechisms and the saints, with Cushingism.
_________________________________________
US HERE – UK HERE (There are many editions.  Look around.)
Also, make use of volumes of the wonderful Baltimore Catechism, which has different volumes for different ages (US HERE – UK HERE).  It’s so useful, in its Q&A format.   The Catechism of Pius X is also great.  (US HERE – UK HERE).  There are many good resources available.
Lionel: Be aware that the liberals in Baltimore revised this Catechism. So with Cushingism the catechism teaches that only those who know, need to enter the Church. They brought it in line with the error of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995).
__________________________________
However, make sure you have the Catechism of the Catholic Church.  
Lionel: And make sure you interpret it with Feeneyism and not as Fr. Z interprets the Catechism, the dogma EENS, Vatican Council II and the past catechisms. 
___________________________________
Some might say that the older the better.   Fine.  But if you are in a “dialogue” with Just-Call-Me “Bruce”, you need the current official Catechism of the Catholic Church.  If “Bruce” objects to anything in it, he’s toast… and he knows it, too, deep down.
Lionel: If Bruce interprets the official Catechism of the Catholic Church with Cushingism and you are not aware of it, then you are toast.You will not get the Vatican, USCCB or Fr. Z to come to your help.
_______________________________________
Fathers, don’t be a plumber without a wrench.
Lionel: Yes know your Catechism and interpret it only with Feeneyism( invisible cases are always invisible, the baptism of desire and blood allegedly without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church refers to an invisble case).So CCC 846 and CCC 1257 do not contradict the rigorist interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. There is no clash.
_________________________________________
Consider making an entire year of preaching based on the Catechism
Lionel: Yes affirm outside the Church there is no salvation, there is no known salvation and cite CCC 846,845,1257.
Announce that all Christians with no exception need to enter the Catholic Church with Catholic Faith to avoid the fires of Hell( CCC 846,845, AG 7).
Announce that all Jews, Muslims and other non Christians are on the way to Hell without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church (CCC 1257).
Announce that Catholics are the new people of God , the Chosen People (CCC 845,CCC 1257,CCC 846.Outside the Church there is no salvation).
Announce that there should be no separation of Church and State and Christ should be King over all political legislation and governments in the world.Since being a Catholic was a priority for salvation according to the Catechism(CCC 845.God wants all people to be united into the Church, the Church is the only Ark of Noah that saved in the Flood).
This is the old ecclesiology based on the Catechism of the Catholic Church(Feeneyite 1995). It is in harmony with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and the other Catechisms (Feeneyite) interpreted without mixing up theoretical and defacto cases, what is explicit and implicit, what is invisible and visible.
______________________________________
 Go through it portion by portion, perhaps also with a weekly parish inquiry class on its content which capable lay people might help to run.
Lionel: It will probably have to be done at a home of one of the lay members of the parish. Since the parish priest will not allow the Catechism to be interpreted with the theology of Feeneyism. He could lose his position.
May be if Fr.Z or someone else brings up this issue in public, then lay Catholics can affirm the Catechism with Feeneyism and not as a rupture with Tradition.They could follow the Feeneyite bishop or cardinal.Until then one has to affirm the Catholic faith independently and with the opposition of the local Cushingite bishop.
___________________________________________
GET THE BOOK!
Do you have the book?
READ THE BOOK!
Thus endeth the rant.
Lionel: Read the blog posts on the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Vatican Council II, Ecclesiology etc on this blog EucharistandMission.It  will help.
-Lionel Andrades

1
https://gloria.tv/article/3b3kGDSEWX9F1H2TvHVepvtkv


http://wdtprs.com/blog/2017/04/are-you-anxious-upset-confused-about-the-church-today-wherein-fr-z-rants/

Tracey Rowland, Fr. John Zuhlsdorf and Bishop Morlino in the Diocese of Madison, USA are 'doing theology' with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism


  
Tracey Rowland, Fr. John Zuhlsdorf and Bishop Morlino in the Diocese of Madison, USA are 'doing theology' with Cushingism as a philosophy ( invisible cases are physically visible, invisible baptism of desire is visible) and Cushingism as a theology( physically visible cases of the baptism of desire are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS),so there is salvation outside the Catholic Church) is approved and is official.1
FALSE THEOLOGY OF ROWLAND,ZUHLSDORF AND MORLINO
This is a false theology in the Catholic Church and is less then a hundred years.It is magisterial heresy and contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. At Fatima Our Lady said that the dogma of the faith will be lost, except in Portugal.
When Our Lady made this prophecy at Fatima the dogma was not lost at that time.
DOGMA OF THE FAITH WILL BE LOST- FATIMA
It is with the new theology of Cushingism that the dogma of the faith on salvation has been lost.
Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the theology of Cushingism or Feeneyism ( invisible cases are physically invisible, invisible baptism of desire is not visible).So only with Cushingism does Vatican Council II emerge as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known in the 16th century.
SEMINARIANS IN MADISON WILL BE TAUGHT FALSE THEOLOGY
This philosophical subjectivism in salvation theology is now being used also in moral theology at the pontifical universities and in Pope Francis' Amoris Laetitia.
Bishop_Morlino.gifTracey Rowland, Fr. John Zuhlsdorf and Bishop Morlino follow this false theology. It is taught to the seminarians in the diocese.
FEENEYISM IS THE RATIONAL CHOICE WHICH THEY OMIT
Instead of Cushingism, they could interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (n.846) with the theology of Feeneyism ( invisible cases are invisible,they are not physically seen; the baptism of desire is invisible.It cannot be an exception to the dogma EENS.So CCC 846( all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church) does not contradict Feeneyite  extra ecclesiam nulla salus).Vatican Council II is not a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the 16th century magisterium and missionaries.
THEY COULD CLARIFY THAT POPE BENEDICT MADE A MISTAKE IN MARCH 2016
So they could clarify that Pope Benedict XVI made a mistake in March 2016 when he stated in Avvenire that extra ecclesiam nulla salus is no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries. He said that there was a development with Vatican Council II.He meant Vatican Council II interpreted with Cushingism.
HERETICAL POSITION OF THE TWO POPES
The position of Pope Benedict and Pope Francis on this issue is heretical. They interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with the theology of Cushingism.They do this even when they have a choice.It is the same with Tracey Rowland, Fr. John Zuhlsdorf and Bishop Morlino.It is the same with the four cardinals who sent the dubbia on Amoris Laetitia.
Image result for Photo of Il timoneImage result for Photo La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana
RICCARDO CASCIOLI INTERPRETS FAITH AND MORALS WITH CUSHINGISM TOO
It is the same with the organisers and speakers at the conference on Amoris Laetitia last Saturday in Rome organised by Riccardo Cascioli the directior of Il Timone and La Nuova Bussola Quotidiano.
THERE IS ONLY ONE INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II WHEN FEENEYISM IS USED
They all need to interpret magisterial documents with rational Feeneyism and reject irrational Cushingism.There is only one interpretation of Vatican Council II.With Cushingism Vatican Council II can be interpreted in two ways.
Image result for Bishop Morlino Madison seminarians
WITH FEENEYISM THERE IS NO NEW ECUMENISM OR THEOLOGY OF RELIGIONS IN VATICAN COUNCIL II
Morlino - Francis
With Feeneyism there is no new ecumenism or a theology of religions in Vatican Council II.Jews and other non Catholics would have to convert into the Church as members with Vatican Council II, Feeneyite. There are no two interpretations of Vatican Council II here.
WITH FEENEYISM MISSION IS BASED ON ALL NEEDING TO CONVERT WITH NO EXCEPTIONS AND NOT ON ALL WHO KNOW
With Feeneyism, Mission is based on all needing to convert into the Catholic Church as members.There is no alternative.Mission is traditional.To say only those non Catholics need to enter the Church who 'know' about Jesus and the Church and who are not in invisible ignorance is the theology of Cushingism.It has to be rejected as irrational. Since there are no known cases of any one saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. So it never was an exception or relevant to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.There are no two interpretations of Vatican Council II even here.Since those who know or do not know and who are saved or not cannot be known to us on earth. So they are still irrelevant to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite).
DUBBIA ON SALVATION AND MORAL THEOLOGY NEEDED
The Lay Conference in Rome on Saturday organised by Riccardo Cascioli could ask Pope Benedict to answer a dubbia on moral and salvation theology which he was responsible for as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and which is related to Amoris Laetitia I mentioned in an earlier post.
Image result for Photo of Pope Benedict XVI and cardinal MullerImage result for Photo of Pope Benedict XVI and cardinal Muller
WITH SUBJECTIVISM IN SALVATION THEOLGY POPE BENEDICT ASSUMES THERE IS KNOWN SALVATION OUTSIDE THE CHURCH.
Pope Benedict assumes invisible cases are visible, unknown factors are known, un-judgeable cases are capable of being judged.So he infers that there are exceptions to the general  de fide teachings on morals and salvation.This was being taught at Pontifical universities and seminaries  when he was the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.With this subjective philosophy( subjectivism)  invisible cases are visible in salvation and so there is salvation outside the Church according to the new salvation theology.Similarly Catholics in mortal sin will be saved and this can be judged and so this is the new moral theology.This is the salvation and moral theology he approves and so  Amoris Laetitia is not a problem for him.
POPE BENEDICT REFUSED TO INTERPRET EENS WITH FEENEYISM IN MARCH 2016
Benedict XVI could have interpreted Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), in March 2016 with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism.If he chose Feeneyism ( no visible exceptions to EENS, invisible baptism of desire is not visible in 2016) then Vatican Council II could not have 'evolved', there would not be ' a development'.
WITH CUSHINGISM THERE WAS A DEVELOPMENT OF THE DOGMA FOR POPE BENEDICT
However with Cushingism as the new theology, LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to physically visible cases, allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. They are explicit exceptions to all needing to enter the Church with 'faith and baptism' for salvation.Vatican Council II (Cushingite-with invisible baptism of desire being visible) is a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite). There is also a new EENS, it is EENS ( Cushingite) in which there are exceptions.
Image result for Bishop Morlino Madison seminarians
This is the theology of the seminarians at Madison this August where Fr. Zuhlsdorf is expected to speak.
FR.ZUHLSDORF DOES NOT CONSIDER INTER-FAITH MARRIAGES AS BEING ADULTERY SINCE HE AFFIRMS EENS WITH CUSHINGISM
Since Fr. Zuhlsdorf does not affirm Vatican Council II and EENS Feeneyite for him inter-faith marriages are not adultery.He said quite a few times on his blog that the baptism of desire is an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus and so he was telling 'the powers that be' that he does not affirm Feeneyite EENS.In March 2016 Pope Benedict also said the same thing for the 'relevant people.'Fr.Zuhlsdorf is a liberal on this issue.
TRADITIONAL LATIN MASS WITH THE NEW THEOLOGY, NEW ECCLESIOLOGY, CUSHINGITE THEOLOGY
Image result for Bishop Morlino Madison seminarians
He affirms the new ecclesiology with Cushingism and offers the Traditional Latin Mass ad orientem.He then calls this TLM the mass of the centuries.He does not encourage priests to offer the Novus Ordo Mass with the old ecclesiology,which depended on Feeneyite EENS.
SEMINARIANS AT MADISON TO BE FED THE NEW CUSHINGITE THEOLOGY AND THEY WILL BE ASKED TO OFFER THE TLM
The same Cushingite flaw, that of subjectivism, in faith(salvation) and morals is there in the books of Tracey Rowland which he has distributed amongst those poor seminarians.-Lionel Andrades
1.

April 21, 2017
There is a false theology in the Catholic Church and it is less than a hundred years old : 'the dogma will be lost' Our Lady at Fatima prophesied http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/there-is-false-theology-in-catholic.html
2.
Image result for Riccardo Cascioli Photos
Riccardo Cascioli must ask Pope Benedict these questions : a dubbia on salvation and moral theology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/riccardo-cascioli-must-ask-pope.html
3.

Pope Benedict XVI could have interpreted Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in March 2016 with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism: he chose heresy and the hermeneutic of rupture

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/pope-benedict-xvi-could-have.html


 Image result for Bishop Morlino Madison seminarians
 Image result for Bishop Morlino Madison seminarians
http://wdtprs.com/blog/2017/04/books-for-seminarians-project-completed/
https://akacatholic.com/bishop-morlino-have-nothing-to-do-with-sspx/