Tuesday, March 7, 2017

There is no Christian theology of religious pluralism : Masons, Pope Benedict and Pope Francis are wrong

Image result for Photo  are you a Catholic?
Are you a Catholic they would like to ask me ? Traditionalists and liberals may wonder.You may go for daily Mass they could say  but do you accept the magisterium of the two popes? Theologically you are in rebellion against them ?
I ACCEPT ALL MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS
 I am a Catholic. I accept all magisterial documents but I do so with the theology of Feeneyism ( there are no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) in 2017, there are no visible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).I interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.
Image result for Photo  Traditionalists use the new way
TRADITIONALISTS USE THE NEW THEOLOGY
The traditionalists, liberals and the two popes also accept all magisterial documents but they interpret them with the theology of Cushingism( there are known and physically visible exceptions to the dogma  EENS in 2017, the BOD and I.I refer to physically visible and personally known people saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church).This is the new theology.
So our conclusions are different with Feeneyism and Cushingism, even though we may read the same magisterial text.
POPES CREATE HERMENEUTIC OF RUPTURE
I accept the popes as popes but do not interpret Vatican Council II like them.They have created the hermeneutic of rupture with the past popes, Tradition and the dogma EENS.With Cushingism they have to reject the dogma EENS( Feeneyite). I do not have to do so.
Image result for Photo Catholic theology
POPE BENEDICT CONFIRMS DOCTRINE HAS BEEN CHANGED
For me Catholic theology and doctrine are the same before and after Vatican Council II. It is not the same for the popes.Pope Benedict XVI confirmed this last March 2016 when he said bluntly that EENS today is no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries.
It is no more the same because of the Cushing theology.There was no Cushing theology in the 16th century.
RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES NEED GET RID OF FALSE PREMISE
Now with the Franciscans, Dominicans, Benedictine and other communities there is a rupture today with the theology of the founders of their community.All they have to do is to get rid of the false premise, which creates Cushingism, and they return to the past ecclesiology of their founders.Who is going to explain this to them?
I ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH THE PAST ECCLESIOLOGY
So I am a Catholic. I affirm the past ecclesiology and accept Vatican Council II without the new ecclesiology.
I do not have to reject the Council.Since Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is in harmony with Tradition.
It is Vatican Council II (Cushingite) which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction and I reject it.
Image result for Photos   Holy Mass problem
HOLY MASS IS BEING ATTENDED WITH NEW DOCTRINES AND THEOLOGY
Presently the Novus Ordo and Traditional Latin Mass ( TLM) is being offered or attended , with doctrines created by a false theology- but not for me.
IN 1949 THE MAGISTERIUM CREATED A NEW WAY, A NEW THE0LOGY
The present Cushingite magisterium teaches irrationality and heresy and no one  corrects them.The error has come into the Church since the 1940's and has been consolidated in Vatican Council II.Vatican Council II can be interpreted in two ways. The magisterium made a mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office and created a new way, a new theology.They brought in innovation.
Image result for Photo Fr.Leonard Feeney
WITH CUSHINGISM THEY RE-INTERPRET THE POPES AND SAINTS
The magisterium and Catholic traditionalists instead of supporting Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston  on  EENS supported the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (supported also by Archbishop Lefebvre) which was based upon the new theology, Cushingism.With Cushingism they re-interpreted the popes and saints of the past.Wherevere there was a reference to BOD and I.I they assumed that these invisible cases were visible.So they projected St.Thomas Aquinas, St.Augustine, the Council of Trent, the Catechism of Pope Pius X etc as being Cushingite.
Image result for Photo you are all wrong
ALL USE THE COMMON FALSE PREMISE
This was the mistake of the magisterium, the liberals and traditionalists.With this irrationality Vatican Council II had to be a break with the past, and the liberals welcomed this conclusion.While the traditionalists and sedevacantists rejected it.However all of them were wrong because of their common false premise.
Image result for Photo Catholic theology
I AM NOT A TRAD OR SEDE WHO HAS REJECTED VATICAN COUNCIL II
Today when I say all Jews and Muslims in 2017 are on the way to Hell with no exceptions, no known exceptions,unless they formerly enter the Catholic Church as members , I am not saying this as a trad or sede who has rejected Vatican Council II ( Cushingite).This is the stuff of martyrs.
The trads and sedes will reject Vatican Council II (Cushingite) since for them invisible cases of LG 16 ( invincible ignorance) for example, would refer to visible people in 2017 saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.This is irrational and it is the product of the new theology.
No one is telling this to them.The political Left magisterium is pretending as if it does not know all this.
Image result for Photos of  innovation
CARDINAL RATZINGER WAS INNOVATIVE IN HIS MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS
Cardinl Ratzinger had been writing magisterial documents ( Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus etc) with Cushingism and he wanted us to accept them as being magisterial.But it really is an innovation and heresy in the Church. He has rejected the theology of exclusivist ecclesiocentrism and has replaced it with a vague Christology, which separates Jesus from the Church with reference to salvation.The separation was made with Cushingism. With Cushingism it was assumed there was known salvation outside the Church and so all did not need to be members for salvation. With Cushingism, the baptism of desire etc were made relevant to the dogma EENS, even though they were unknown to us in the present times.
Image result for Photo of missing link
WE HAVE THE MISSING LINK TO THE HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY OR RUPTURE
So without Cushingism, I can interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS and say all Jews and Muslims are oriented to Hell in the present times and I do not have to be a trad or sede.And no one can accuse me of rejecting Vatican Council II.I have found the Missing Link as to what makes Vatican Council II a continuity or rupture with the past ecclesiocentrism, the exclusivist ecclesiology.
The Left does not allow Catholics to affirm EENS ( Feeneyite) and so they are not likely to approve EENS ( Cushingite) either.
Image result for Photo  Traditionalists use the new way
SSPX IS CUSHINGITE
The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX)  affirms EENS and Vatican Council II with Cushingism and so do the diocesan priests.When they see the references to invincible ignorance , for example, in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995) they interpret it with Cushingism; these are visible cases for them. I use Feeneyism.So the Catechism is not a problem for me as it is for them.
Similarly we would interpret LG 16, LG 8, AG 7 etc, differently.
It is the same Vatican  Council II but they use a different lens, they have a different perspective and conclusion.This comes about, for them, when they assume hypothetical cases are not hypothetical.LG 16 is not a theoretical and hypothetical case for them, for example.
Image result for Photos   common mistake
Just about everybody is making this mistake so those who would want to correct this error would be isolated.
It is easy to blame the two popes but often the trad or  sede do not have the courage to breakthrough.They have bank balances and do not want to be hit by a Leftist ' hate' law.They want to protect their blogs and websites.Religious do not want to be suspended.
So every one affirms the offical lie.
The political hate charge can be brought down on anyone who affirms Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and claims he is a good Catholic and not a trad ,sede or liberal.
So the theologians  say that invisible cases are visible and in this way remain in good standing with the Left.Every one employed at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith office, Vatican, has to repeat this lie.
Image result for Photos   fantasy
WE CANNOT SEE PEOPLE IN HEAVEN WITH THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE
I am no theologian.All I keep saying, fundamentally,  is that we cannot physically see people in Heaven. We cannot see people in Heaven or on earth saved without the baptism of water and with the baptism of desire/blood or in invincible ignorance.So there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II now.One with BOD and I.I being visible and the other with them being invisible. The conclusion is different.
Image result for Photo  are you a Catholic?
This is important for mission. It means we proclaim the Gospel knowing that the majority of people on earth are oriented to Hell, they are on the way to Hell, unless they enter the Church as members, with 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).
Image result for Photo of cHRISTIAN tHEOLOGY OF rELIGIOUS pLURALISM
TWO POPES CONTRADICT POPE JOHN PAUL II
Also the present joint mission with other Christian communities, initiated by Pope Benedict is based upon  false doctrine and theology. The other Christian communities  should be told that they are on the way to Hell, unless they formally enter the Catholic Church, the only Church Jesus founded, outside of which there is no salvation.There is no Christian theology of religious pluralism and the Masons and Pope Benedict and Pope Francis are wrong.They are contradicting Pope John Paul II who corrected Fr.Jacques Dupuis s.j.-Lionel Andrades