Wednesday, January 25, 2017

Cardinal Richard Cushing and Nostra Aetate picked up the objective error from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949

Image result for Photo Cardinal Richard Cushing

CUSHING HELPED DRAFT NOSTRA AETATE

Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston played ' a vital role in drafting Nostra Aetate'1.  The Catechism of the Catholic Church then states that 'the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator'.2

CUSHING APPROVED THE LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE ADDRESSED TO HIM
Cardinal Richard Cushing had accepted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 addressed to him.It assumed that there were known cases of the baptism of desire which were explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as held by Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center in Boston.So there was salvation outside the Church for him. Non Catholics could be saved without beinging incorporated into the Church as members.
But there are no such cases, past or present!
This was a mistake in the Letter 1949 which has been repeated in Nostra Aetate.
THE LETTER CONTRADICTS THE DOGMA EENS
The dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus over the centuries taught that every one needed to be incorporated into the Church as members. The Letter says the opposite and it was accepted by Cardinal Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston.
PLAN OF SALVATION INCLUDES NON CATHOLICS WHO DO NOT NEED TO CONVERT INTO THE CHURCH
So the Catechism of the Catholic Church of Cardinal Ratzinger also  assumes that the plan of salvation includes non Catholics, who do not need to convert into the Catholic Church, as members.Since there was allegedly known salvation outside the Church.
Nostra Aetate states :
The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions.
and it states:
Indeed, she proclaims, and ever must proclaim Christ "the way, the truth, and the life" (John 14:6), in whom men may find the fullness of religious life, in whom God has reconciled all things to Himself.-Nostra Aetate 2

CUSHING,NOSTRA AETATE  AND THE LETTER PROCLAIMS CHRIST WITHOUT THE NECESSITY OF MEMBERSHIP IN THE CHURCH
Nostra Aetate  proclaims Christ without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church.Since Cardinal Cushing had accepted that there was known salvation outside the Church. In other words at that time or in the past, someone in  Rome or the Archdiocese of Boston  knew the name and surname of someone saved outside the Church; without faith and baptism.This is irrational and non traditional.How could there be known exceptions?
HERETICAL
It is also heretical since it is rejecting a defined dogma by assuming invisible people saved outside the Church were visible.Then it is inferred that they were exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as it was known over the centuries.
OBJECTIVE MISTAKE
There is an objective error here in Nostra Aetate as it is there in the Letter 1949.There cannot be people saved in Heaven without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church who can be known on earth. Similarly there cannot be people on earth who are going to be saved with the baptism of desire, for example, and without the baptism of water, who are known to us human beings or who can be judged as saved.There is no such objective case and there cannot be one.
SALVATION OUTSIDE THE CHURCH FOR CARDINAL CUSHING
According to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus all non Catholics are on the way to Hell.However for Cardinal Cushing there was salvation outside the Church and Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated by him.So Nostra Aetate  3 says:
 The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth,(5) who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God.-Nostra Aetate 3
NOSTRA AETATE CONTRADICTS AD GENTES 7
Nostra Aetate 3 contradicts Ad Gentes 7 which indicates all Muslims are on the way to Hell since they do not have 'faith and baptism' needed for salvation.
AD GENTES 7 CONTRADICTS ITSELF: CUSHING EFFECT
However in Ad Gentes 7 also the Cushing Effect is there since it states:
Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it.Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him "-Ad Gentes 7
KNOWN CASES OF BEING SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE
Cushing assumed that being saved in invincible ignorance referred to personally known cases.These known people were saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church,for him. This was the reasoning in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 addressed to him.
NEW DOCTRINE WITH NEW THEOLOGY BASED ON IRRATIONAL PHILOSOPHICAL REASONING.
So Ad Gentes 7 says those men cannot be saved ' who though aware'....In other words not every one with no exception needs to enter the Church for salvation but only those who are aware of Jesus and the Church.Notice the new doctrine created with the new theology based on invisible cases being visible exceptions to the old ecclesiology.
VATICAN COUNCIL II PASSAGES BASED UPON THE LETTER'S CONFUSION
So there are orthodox passages in Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14) and there are contradictory passages based upon the confusion in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.The Letter mixed up invisible and visible cases.It then  postulated practical exceptions to the traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Church.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church instead of correcting this error repeats it.-Lionel Andrades 


1.

Second Vatican Council

At the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965) Cushing played a vital role in drafting Nostra aetate, the document that officially absolved the Jews of deicide charge. His emotional comments during debates over the drafts were echoed in the final version...-Wikipedia
2.
841    The Church's relationship with the Muslims. "The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind's judge on the last day."-Catechism of the Catholic Church
____________________________________

https://www.thebostonpilot.com/articleprint.asp?id=172093

May 12, 2013

Richard Cushing Error in Ad Gentes 7 and Nostra Aetate

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/05/richard-cushing-error-in-ad-gentes-7.html

Even though informed Catholics are pretending that there are exceptions to Vatican Council (AG 7) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/05/even-though-informed-catholics-are.html




When I write about all this Catholics ask how could it be so simple ? There must be something wrong in what you say.Why did we not know about this before? Even the SSPX and the sedevacantists did not know ?

My Spiritual Director at the Beda Pontifical College, Fr.Jim would say that we cannot really know the three conditions of mortal sin and so we cannot really know a mortal sin.
Partially correct. We cannot know the three conditions of a mortal sin, subjectively we cannot judge them as being exceptions, so they are not exceptions to the traditional teaching on mortal sin. However we know what is a mortal sin and there is no new moral theology based on alleged  exceptions, to contradict it.
Image result for Photos of catechism of the catholic church bookSo the Catechism's three conditions for mortal sin are not really knowable conditions and so are not exceptions to the traditional teaching on mortal sin.
Similarly the baptism of desire cannot be known in personal cases and so is not an exception to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So the Catechism supports the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus when it says all need faith and baptism (Ad Gentes 7),outside the Church there is no salvation(CCC846).So there are no exceptions to the dogma EENS mentioned in the Catechism.
Similarly the Catechism affirms the traditional teaching on mortal sin and Hell while the three conditions are hypothetical and not exceptions to the traditional teachings on morals.
So this means that the Catechism of the Catholic Church:
Image of St. Francis Xavier
1.Supports the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the 16th century missionaries for example.
2.It supports traditional morals.
3.It supports traditional ecumenism since all non Catholic Christians are on the way to Hell without faith and baptism in the Catholic Church.This is the traditional ecclesiocentrism based on Feeneyite EENS which the Catechism does not contradict.
4.Non Christians are oriented to Hell with no known exceptions.Supports the traditional teaching on other religions whose members are all oriented to Hell in 2017 since there is no known salvation outside the Church. So the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is not contradicted by the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
5.Catholics in inter-faith marriages are living in adultery.Considers Catholics who marry non Catholics in civil marriages as living in adultery.Non Catholics are outside the Church and are on the way to Hell.
6.It supports the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation since all need to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell and this is the priority in politics.So there is no separation of Church and State.
CATECHISM SUPPORTS ECCLESIOCENTRISM OF PAST
The Catechism of the Catholic Church supports the ecclesiocentrism of the past when we do not confuse invisible and hypothetical cases as being objectively known.
This is the confusion of the present magisterium.Instead of clarifying the Faith for Catholics they have been concealing it for ideological reasons.
WHY DID WE NOT KNOW THIS BEFORE?
When I write this Catholics ask how could it be so simple there must be something wrong in what you say.Or why did we not know of this before? How come you a lay man is explaining this and not the numerous persons,including priests, with theological degrees?
SSPX, SEDES IN IGNORANCE?
Why did the SSPX bishops and priests and sedevacantists not know this?
I say to myself they were not aware of the false theology and the simple alternative and they were wrongly blaming the Novus Ordo Mass.
However all this can change
 
All Catholics can now affirm Tradition and use the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II as a supporting reference.
 
CANONICAL STATUS
They can demand canonical status and affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) in which invisible cases are only invisible) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church( Feeneyite).
ASK THE POPES TO AFFIRM VATICAN COUNCIL II
They can demand that the two popes, the present magisterium affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite). Since Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) is irrational, non traditional and heretical. It is based on a false premise.What is invisible is assumed to be visible.A new fantasy theology was then created upon this philosophical error.
ASK THE CDF TO ACKNOWLEDGE PHILOSOPHICAL ERROR
They can ask the CDF to acknowledge that there has been a major philosophical error in theology and doctrine.They could point out the philosophical error of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which is repeated in Vatican Council II, especially in Nostra Aetate which suggests that there is known salvation outside the Church and so non Catholics are saved in their religions.
BE AWARE INVISIBLE CASES ARE NEVER PHYSICALLY VISIBLE
All this is possible for Catholics who acknowledge the obvious i.e invisible cases cannot be physically visible.Invisible subjective factors cannot mistakenly be assumed to be known and manifest with reference to mortal sin and salvation.They cannot be inferred to be an exception to general principles or traditional teaching.This was also a basic mistake in Pope Francis' Amoris Laetitia.
-Lionel Andrades
 
Image result for Photo logo Prayers for Christian Unity
 
January 24, 2017