Thursday, January 5, 2017

In 2016 over 1.5 million Eucharists were distributed at Mass in Medugorje :conversions continue among pilgrims

Image result for photo of Our Lady of Medjugorje

FRUIT OF MEDJUGORJE



TEA WITH ROSIE

http://content.streamhoster.com/embed/playlists/su?autoPlay=0#

Our Lady of Medjugorje's January 2, 2017 monthly message :


  


Mirjana, who receives the 25th message from Our LadyThe following is Our Lady of Medjugorje's January 2, 2017 Message, given on the day for non-believers through Mirjana...
January 2, 2017 Message Given through Mirjana

“Dear children, My Son was the source of love and light when He spoke on earth to the people of all peoples. My apostles, follow His light. This is not easy. You must be little. You must make yourselves smaller than others; with the help of faith to be filled with His love. Not a single person on earth can experience a miraculous experience without faith. I am with you. I am making myself known to you by these comings, by these words; I desire to witness to you my love and motherly care. My children, do not waste time posing questions to which you never receive an answer. At the end of your journey on earth, the Heavenly Father will give them to you. Always know that God knows everything; God sees, God loves. My most beloved Son illuminates lives, dispels darkness; and my motherly love which carries me to you is inexpressible, mysterious but real. I am expressing my feelings to you: love, understanding and motherly benevolence. Of you, my apostles, I am asking for your roses of prayer which need to be acts of love. To my motherly heart these are the dearest prayers. I offer these to my Son Who was born for your sake. He looks at you and hears you. We are always close to you. This is the love which calls, unites, converts, encourages and fulfills. Therefore, my apostles, always love one another and above all, love my Son. This is the only way to salvation, to eternal life. This is my dearest prayer which fills my heart with the most beautiful scent of roses. Pray, always pray for your shepherds that they may have the strength to be the light of my Son. Thank you.”
-from Fruit of Medugorje and Mary TV

With the new model for their websites the traditionalists and sedevacantists would be affirming the Social Reign of Christ the King and the old ecumenism based on the old ecclesiology without rejecting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995)

Image result for photos of Fr.Leonard Feeney
With the new model for their websites the traditionalists and sedevacantists would be affirming the Social Reign of Christ the King  and the old ecumenism based on the old ecclesiology.1 With Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus, inter religious dialogue is back to its traditional model.
The new ecumenism is based on allegedly known salvation outside the Church.This is Cushingism.It is irrational and non traditional.
The new inter-religious dialogue with non Christians is based also on there being known salvation outside the Church.It is irrational,non traditional and heretical. It rejects the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
With the rejection of the old ecclesiology there is the rejection of the teachings on the Social  Reign of Christ the King.It is said that if there is salvation outside the Church why should all political legislation be based on Jesus as he is known in the Catholic Church.The exception makes the new rule.A person can be saved outside the Church is the exception.
The new model however supports the old ecclesiology upon which the Social Reign of Christ the King is based.All political legislation must have the teachings of the Catholic Church as its priority since outside the Church there is no known salvation, outside the Church there is no salvation.
With the new model we have the old ecclesiology intact.This is the foundation for the the old ecumenism of non return, the need for non Catholics to be incorporated into the Catholic Church to avoid the fires of Hell,the Social Reign of Christ the King, Catholics in inter-faith marriage being a mortal sin,since the spouse is outside the Church, the non-separation of Church and State and the Eucharist being given only to Catholics.
So with the new model(as expressed in the  blog post Traditionalist, sedevacantist websites need to be updated )which really is 'the old model', we affirm the old ecclesiology and also Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995), Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus etc.2
How is this possible now and never before it may be asked?
The difference between the past and now is the theology.If you switch the theology you change the ecclesiology without having to deny any magisterial document mentioned above.
When the baptism of desire was assumed to be visible and known in personal cases, theology in the Catholic Church was changed.
Now we affirm invisible baptism of desire, which is rational, and we go back to the old ecclesiology.We don't add any thing new.We do not create a new theology to get rid of the Rahner-Ratzinger one.
We switch from Cushingism to Feeneyism.
Then we affirm all the magisterial documents, this time not with Cushingism,but with Feeneyism.
Presently the traditionalist websites are critical of Vatican Council II which for them is a break with the past.This is only because their theology is Cushingite. The fault is not there with Vatican Council II per se.
The traditionalist websites can now affirm Vatican Council II as a continuity with the past because the theology would be the same as that of the 16th century missionaries.
So the ecclesiology of the Novus Ordo and Traditional Latin Mass would be the same as that of the past centuries.
This is a breakthrough in the Catholic Church.The theological rupture with the past has ended and we no more have to blame Vatican Council II for it.
Even though the cardinals at Vatican Council II accepted the Cushingite theology the Council can be interpreted today with Feeneyism.Hypothetical cases simply have to be considered hypothetical and not objectively known.It's as simple as that.
-Lionel Andrades 

1

JANUARY 5, 2017


Traditionalist, sedevacantist websites need to be updated

Image result for Photo Bishop Bernard FellayImage result for Photo Bishop Donald SanbornImage result for Photo Bishop Mark Pivarunas
Here is a possible model. The traditionalist and sedevacantist websites, in fact Catholic websites in general, could state the following in future:
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/01/traditionalist-sedevacantist-websites.html

2.
WE AFFIRM
'We affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with the Catechism of  Pope Pius X, the Syllabus of Errors, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite), the Nicene Creed, the Athanasius Creed, the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995), Dominus Iesus, Redemptoris Missio and the rest of Tradition.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/01/traditionalist-sedevacantist-websites.html
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________


Our Lady of Medjugorje's January 2, 2017 monthly message :


 

Mirjana, who receives the 25th message from Our LadyThe following is Our Lady of Medjugorje's January 2, 2017 Message, given on the day for non-believers through Mirjana...
January 2, 2017 Message Given through Mirjana

 

“Dear children, My Son was the source of love and light when He spoke on earth to the people of all peoples. My apostles, follow His light. This is not easy. You must be little. You must make yourselves smaller than others; with the help of faith to be filled with His love. Not a single person on earth can experience a miraculous experience without faith. I am with you. I am making myself known to you by these comings, by these words; I desire to witness to you my love and motherly care. My children, do not waste time posing questions to which you never receive an answer. At the end of your journey on earth, the Heavenly Father will give them to you. Always know that God knows everything; God sees, God loves. My most beloved Son illuminates lives, dispels darkness; and my motherly love which carries me to you is inexpressible, mysterious but real. I am expressing my feelings to you: love, understanding and motherly benevolence. Of you, my apostles, I am asking for your roses of prayer which need to be acts of love. To my motherly heart these are the dearest prayers. I offer these to my Son Who was born for your sake. He looks at you and hears you. We are always close to you. This is the love which calls, unites, converts, encourages and fulfills. Therefore, my apostles, always love one another and above all, love my Son. This is the only way to salvation, to eternal life. This is my dearest prayer which fills my heart with the most beautiful scent of roses. Pray, always pray for your shepherds that they may have the strength to be the light of my Son. Thank you.”
 

Traditionalist, sedevacantist websites need to be updated

Image result for Photo Bishop Bernard FellayImage result for Photo Bishop Donald SanbornImage result for Photo Bishop Mark Pivarunas
Here is a possible model. The traditionalist and sedevacantist websites, in fact Catholic websites in general, could state the following in future:

WE AFFIRM
'We affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with the Catechism of  Pope Pius X, the Syllabus of Errors, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite), the Nicene Creed, the Athanasius Creed, the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995), Dominus Iesus, Redemptoris Missio and the rest of Tradition.
We assume hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are not objectively visibile in 2017.Similarly Lumen Gentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases  and so are not exceptions to the traditional exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.Invisible and unknown persons cannot be exceptions.
We reiterate that we affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with Tradition including the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was interpreted by the 16th century missionaries.
 
 WE REJECT
We reject an interpretation of Vatican Council II which assumes hypothetical cases are not hypothetical and that there is known salvation outside the Church.
We reject the New Theology based on known cases of the baptism of desire etc without the baptism of water.This is irrational.

HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY
We call upon the two popes to also affirm Vatican Council II in continuity with the past : with the hermeneutic of continuity,just as we do.
Otherwise the present magisterium will continue to be in heresy and in a rupture with the past.
As a theology we affirm Feeneyism which says there are no known exceptions to the dogma EENS. We reject Cushingism which suggests wrongly, that there are known exceptions  to EENS and so there is salvation outside the Church.

FEENEYITES NOT CUSHINGITES
Our websites reflect our new position.We are no more Cushingites but Feeneyites.We believe that the Cushingite Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston made an objective mistake when it assumed there were explicit, objective cases of people saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.We humans cannot know any such case if it did exist.It would be known only to God.
So the Cushingite Letter(1949) was wrong when it states not every one needs to be incorporated into the Church as a member for salvation.The Catechism of Pope Pius X and Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441 state the opposite.The Letter contradicts itself and is also contradicted by Vatican Council II which states all need faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7).

UPDATE WEBSITES WITH FEENEYISM
So we update our websites by affirming Feeneyite interpreted Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite EENS. We reject a Cushingite Vatican Council II with a Cushingite-interpreted EENS.
We interpret all magisterial documents without the New Theology,which has a philosophical error, being based on invisible cases being visible.

MAGISTERIUM CUSHINGITE
We are aware that the present magisterium interprets all magisterial documents with Cushingism and expects the traditionalists to do the same. They wanted Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to accept Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise and conclusion.He did not. They excommunicated him instead of showing him the alternative Feeneyite possibility.
____________________________
 
-Lionel Andrades

The Rich Man and Lazarus In English Full Movie (HD) (4:16)

The Rich Man and Lazarus In English Full Movie (HD)

https://youtu.be/S_q-pKcNHXI




Parable of the Rich Fool (Luke 12: 13-21)