Thursday, October 26, 2017

How can it be said that a pope in heresy cannot be a pope when the traditionalists are making the same error?

How can it any more be said that Pope Francis is in heresy so he cannot be a pope  when Pope Benedict ,Cardinal Raymond Burke and the traditionalists are also in heresy?
When Louie Verrecchio, Ann Barnhardt and David Domet understand the four points 1 I e-mailed them, then,they can see that they too were affirming heresy and think it is part of the deposit of the faith.
By now they must realize that there is something terribly wrong since they cannot agree nor disagree with me. This is new territory for them.Yet it is and has always been the teaching of the Catholic Church.
So when Cardinal Raymond Burke corrects Pope Francis on Amoris Laetitia it still means that the cardinal himself is in doctrinal error since he interprets magisterial documents with a false premise.
So when St. Robert Bellarmine is cited stating that a pope in mortal sin and heresy cannot be a pope then the same could be said about cardinals and bishops in heresy and mortal sin.How can they hold their ecclesiastical office when they re-interpret magisterial documents using an irrational premise to create a non traditional and heretical conclusion? They first need to correct their error and then correct Pope Francis and Pope Benedict's obvious error in faith and morals.
Louie Verrecchio, Ann Barnhardt, David Domet could first clarify their thinking. Can they affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( premise-free), Vatican Council II( premise-free),Nicene Creed( premise-free),Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994), without the invisible people are visible premise. Can they avoid the false conclusion by asuming that these invisible people who are allegedly visible are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus ?.
If they do not make the correction, then the Nicene Creed's 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins'  changes to 'I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins, they are desire, blood and ignorance and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'. This is heresy.Yet this is the common interpretation with the irrational premise.
They can all choose in principle not to interpret Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being not hypothetical i.e hypothetical cases of LG 16 are hypothetical only.So Vatican Council II( premise-free) is not a break with Tradition. It is not a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors and the dogma EENS( premise-free).
They have not affirmed the Nicene Creed, EENS, Vatican Council II and the Catechisms, all premise-free so how can they say that the pope is teaching heresy and so cannot be pope? -Lionel Andrades

1.
1)The link between the Fr.Leonard Feeney case and theology of Vatican Council II Archbishop Lefebvre had to accept.2)Pope Pius XII made a mistake.The magisterium made an objective error.3)Most Catholics assume that Lumen Gentium 16(invincible ignorance) refers to a known person saved outside the Church, saved without the baptism of water and Catholic faith.4)I am referring to a common reasoning, a common logic which was traditional in the Church and which can be applied to Vatican Council II today.Secondly, there are priests, professors and an Archbishop who agree with this reasoning




 OCTOBER 25, 2017

Image result for Red pills matrix photosImage result for Red pills matrix photos

Louie Verrecchio, Ann Barnhardt and David Domet have probably not understood me since they do not agree or disagree with me : four 'red pills'

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/louie-verrecchio-ann-barnhardt-and.html



OCTOBER 25, 2017


Heresy before Vatican II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/heresy-before-vatican-ii.html


OCTOBER 25, 2017


Protocol 122/49 was written in specific contradistinction to Fr. Feeney’s statement that all who die as non-Catholics are lost

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/protocol-12249-was-written-in-specific.html



 OCTOBER 25, 2017


If Pope Pius XII had come to the defense of Father Feeney in the early 1950’s, and reasserted that all who die as non-Catholics are lost (and therefore must be converted), there would never have been a Vatican II.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/if-pope-pius-xii-had-come-to-defense-of.html


OCTOBER 25, 2017


Louie Verrecchio, Ann Barnhardt, David Domet, the two popes and the CDF Prefect are in heresy : correction and recantation of error needed

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/louie-verrecchio-ann-barnhardt-david.html



OCTOBER 25, 2017


Repost : Pope Francis and Bishop Nunzio fail the test on this 'chart'

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/repost-pope-francis-and-bishop-nunzio.html


OCTOBER 25, 2017


For Cardinal Raymond Burke, Michael Matt, John Salza,Joseph Shaw and Deacon Nick Donnelly Pope Francis is not in heresy.He is not a heretic.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/for-cardinal-raymond-burke-michael-matt.html

 OCTOBER 24, 2017
Truth Decay :For Ralph Martin,Robert Fastiggi and Phillip Blosser Baptism of Desire etc refer to invisible cases but students at Detroit have to infer that they are visible
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/truth-decay-for-ralph-martinrobert.html

OCTOBER 24, 2017

Pope Pius IX on Converting Those Outside the Church (Quanto Conficiamur Moerore) - Matthew Bellisario

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/pope-pius-ix-on-converting-those.html

OCTOBER 24, 2017

Someone needs to help Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Archbishop Pozzo and Archbishop Di Noia see how they use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/someone-needs-to-help-cardinal-luiz.html


OCTOBER 24, 2017

There is an in principle error in the Vatican Council II text : Does the SSPX have to accept it for canonical status?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/there-is-in-principle-error-in-vatican.html


OCTOBER 23, 2017

Sedevacantist watch : Even Pope Benedict XVI interprets Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus, the Nicene Creed and Vatican Council II with a false premise to elicit a non traditional and heretical conclusion. So where does the heresy charge end ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/sedevacantist-watch-even-pope-benedict.html



OCTOBER 23, 2017
Image result for Photo of Archbishop Guido Pozzo

Still no denial from Abp.Guido Pozzo : SSPX must accept Vatican Council II with a false doctrine and the new theology based on an irrational premise

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/still-no-denial-from-abpguido-pozzo.html


_____________________________________________________________

No comments: