Tuesday, October 31, 2017

Vatican-Lutheran Joint Declaration on Justification was null since the Catholic side rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and wrongly re-interpreted Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS

Image result for Photo of Joint Lutheran Catholic Declaration on Justification
The Vatican-Lutheran Joint Declaration on Justification was null since the Catholic side rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) by wrongly re-interpreting Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS.Vatican Council II was wrongly interpreted by assuming hypothetical cases were non hypothetical, so theoretical references like LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc were considered non theoretical, but  explicit and personally known.People saved outside the Church.
Image result for Photo of Joint Lutheran Catholic Declaration on JustificationImage result for Photo of Joint Lutheran Catholic Declaration on Justification
Without this irrationality, Vatican Council II, without the premise would not contradict the dogma EENS which mentions Protestants, Lutherans( heretics) as going to the fires of Hell, unless they enter the Church as members(Cantate Dominino, Council of Florence 1441).
Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict had interpreted Vatican Council II with a hermeneutic of rupture.Since for him there was known salvation outside the Church. The baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance referred to visible people who were saved outside the Church.So Pope Benedict rejected the dogma EENS making the Declaration null for Catholics.
According to EENS( premise-free) and Vatican Council II( premise-free) Lutherans are on the way to Hell.They do not have justification or sanctifying grace.They are outside the Mystical Body of Christ.-Lionel Andrades



 OCTOBER 31, 2017

Image result for Photo of Joint Lutheran Catholic Declaration on Justification

Blog page views for today are 10,067 : PADRE PIO SAID THAT MARTIN LUTHER IS IN HELL AND CHRISTIANS WHO FOLLOW HIM WILL MEET THE SAME END- Fr.Stefano Manelli F.I, founder of the Franciscans of the Immaculate

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/blog-page-views-for-today-are-10067.html

ROSARY PROTEST MEMBER SPEAKS OUT

Rosary Protest Member Speaks Out

BRUSSELS (ChurchMilitant.com) - A video that Church Militant shared on Monday shows a dozen Catholics praying the Rosary to disrupt an "ecumenical" Protestant service in the Cathedral of St. Michael and St. Gudula. The protesters interrupted the service for 40 minutes until they were removed from the cathedral by police. 
The Rosary protest was on Saturday. After our report on Monday, one of the protesters started emailing us with his story. He wished to remain anonymous. 
He explained how the protest Rosary was organized by a local group of Catholic young men. He said, "We have here in Brussels a small group of men gathering together to pray and strengthen our Catholic identity." 
The protester also wrote, "We were in part inspired by The Catholic Gentleman, and I also listen to your Resistance podcasts for some good advice, of course. I'm a regular viewer of ChurchMilitant.com content." 
He later added that following Church Militant was helping him work on his English. 
We have here in Brussels a small group of men gathering together to pray and strengthen our Catholic identity.Tweet
We asked our source about the age range of the people who prayed the Rosary in the video since most of them looked surprisingly young.
He answered, "Among the young-looking people in the video, ages range between 15–30. So indeed, most of us are in our 20s." 
Church Militant expressed interest in the protesters' treatment from the police. He told us that police officers took them out of the cathedral, lined them up along the cathedral's outer wall and checked their IDs. After talking with them about their reasons for protesting, the officers did not press any charges.
"Then the chief policeman in charge said that we were free," our source said, "and that if we stayed around the cathedral or if we continued to distribute our leaflets in the neighborhood, we would be under arrest." 
They took that warning to heart, the young man told us, "And we walked away." 
Then the chief policeman in charge said that we were free and that if we stayed around the cathedral or if we continued to distribute our leaflets in the neighborhood, we would be under arrest.Tweet
In Monday's article, Church Militant noted that the event was covered by Medias-Presse, a French-language Catholic website which seems to have a schismatic twist. Our source told us Tuesday, "We are not schismatics, and we are not related to Medias-Presse. We have nothing to do with that website."
He informed us, "The news was first published on Le Salon Beige," a French Catholic website that our source claims is comparable to Church Militant. 
The young man went on:
We don't appreciate at all the remarks made by Medias-Presse, stating that we "had to act without support of the local traditional clergy." They know nothing about it. We didn't even ask for the participation of priests because the response we had to make was so obvious, and it's the special duty of the laity to defend our faith in these sorts of circumstances (as Bp. Gracida said, for example). We didn't do it in a spirit of polemics towards faithful priests, just in a spirit of reparation and resistance against profanation and celebration of a revolt against the Holy Catholic Church. 
Mainstream Catholic news agency CathoBel advertised the event as ecumenical; but our source counters that it was "in no way just 'ecumenical,' but plainly Protestant." It was a Protestant worship service, he claimed, led by Protestant pastors in their versions of liturgical garb.
He noted that the archbishop of Brussels, Cdl. Jozef De Kesel, "was assisting at the event as an external spectator and hosting it in the cathedral, but he was in no way in charge, presiding or leading the ceremony." 
After police removed the protesting Catholics praying the Rosary, Protestant pastor Steven Fuite gave his sermon. After that, Cdl. De Kesel engaged in a ceremonial exchange of books with Fuite, as CathoBel reported. The point of the gesture, Fuite says, was to show that Protestants and Catholics should read each other's books "instead of burning them." 
The Catholic Belgian website also slammed the protesters praying the Rosary, saying they were "probably from the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X." Our anonymous source strongly denies this allegation, as was quoted above. 
The Cathedral of St. Michael and St. Gudula in Brussels was seized and sacked by Protestant iconoclasts in 1566. It was elevated to the status of co-cathedral in 1962. 

David Nussman
David Nussman is an intern with the News Department.






https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/rosary-protest-member-speaks-out

Blog page views for today are 10,067 : PADRE PIO SAID THAT MARTIN LUTHER IS IN HELL AND CHRISTIANS WHO FOLLOW HIM WILL MEET THE SAME END- Fr.Stefano Manelli F.I, founder of the Franciscans of the Immaculate

Today this blog has received 10,067 page views.The  statistics for yesterday was 467 page views and for last month it was 25,942 page views.The extra ordinary spike I think is due to this blog post of 2013.

JANUARY 28, 2013


PADRE PIO SAID THAT MARTIN LUTHER IS IN HELL AND CHRISTIANS WHO FOLLOW HIM WILL MEET THE SAME END- Fr.Stefano Manelli F.I, founder of the Franciscans of the Immaculate

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/01/padre-pio-said-that-martin-luther-is-in.html


It is 16.15 here and I have not posted anything today.
The other two blog posts which could have been read  were the following two reports.

OCTOBER 30, 2017


Double- speak continues with Ecclesia Dei and the CDF : Vatican Council II is not the real issue for the SSPX reconciliation

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/double-speak-continues-with-ecclesia.html


OCTOBER 30, 2017



Two popes must ask Franciscans, Domincians, Jesuits, Benedictines, Carmelites and other religious organisations and lay movements to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) and then do it themselves

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/two-popes-must-ask-franciscans.html

-Lionel Andrades

SSPX must be aware of the deception of Abp.Guido Pozzo and confront it


Archbishop Guido Pozzo was promoting deception and lies in the negotiations with the SSPX on their canonical recognition.
1.He wanted them to affirm the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) as referring to physically visible and known people saved outside the Church.
2.The SSPX had to affirm LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as referring to physically visible and personally known people saved outside the Church.
So points 1 and 2 above emerge as a rupture with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This is how the Jewish Left would like it.
So he, cardinals Muller and Ladaria  and Pope Benedict  are not going to let the SSPX enter the Church with BOD, BOB,I.I,LG 16,UR 3 etc referring to physically invisible people.There are no practical exceptions to the dogma EENS or the missionaries and magisterium of the 16th century.This is something obvious  but the CDF hides it. 
Archbishop Guido Pozzo, with this irrational philosophy ,was also rejecting the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church and the Syllabus of Errors.At the same time in interviews he was saying Vatican Council II is a continuity with Tradition.
Now when I say that I affirm Vatican Council II( premise-free) with LG 16 etc referring to hypothetical and theoretical cases only, he has nothing to say. He could have consulted with the two popes and cardinals Muller and Ladaria,and they have decided that this is rational, traditional but un-acceptable.SSPX cannot be allowed to affirm Vatican Council II(premise-free) for canonical status.
Archbishop Guido Pozzo is part of the CDF 'gang'.They all have to think alike.
All along Archbishop Guido Pozzo had been deceiving Catholics with the support of the two popes  and the liberal rabbis associated with Israel and the B'nai Brith.
Instead of making it easier for the SSPX to enter the Church, by asking all religious communities to affirm EENS without the explicit-implicit,objective-subjective, visible-invisible mix up, the talks have ended and now permission will be sought from the Bishops Conferences, which are obliged to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise, to create a rupture with Tradition.
The Chief Rabbinate of Israel will not give the two popes permission to affirm the dogma EENS.So Vatican Council II the Catechism and the Nicene Creed have to be interpreted with hypothetical cases being considered non hypothetical.Cardinal Raymond Burke, FSSP, St.Benedict Centres,CMTV, Jesuits, Franciscans and Dominicans  are all already doing this. They have compromised.
The SSPX must be aware of the deception of Archbishop Guido Pozzo and the two popes.
They must continue to stand by their 2012 General Chapter Statement which affirmed EENS without the possibility of salvation outside the Church.
Now they must affirm Vatican Council II with LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc as referring to hypothetical cases, theoretical possibilities known only to God.They cannot be anything else.They cannot be known people saved outside the Church for us humans.
With Vatican Council II not having any exception to the dogma EENS( Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441) we are back to the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.
With the old exclusivist ecclesiology intact there can only be an ecumenism of return.Lutherans need to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid the fires of Hell.The Syllabus of Errors is no more contradicted.
We can proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation, since this becomes a priority, with no known salvation outside the Church.
Since everyone needs to be a member of the Church for salvation(AG 7, LG 14) the priority is the non separation of Church and State.
Inter faith marriages would be adultery, since Protestants and Jews are outside the Church and on the way to Hell.
All this happens when the SSPX switches from visible for us Lumen Gentium 16 to invisible for us LG 16 and informs Archbishop Guido Pozzo about this.Of course he will reject it, if he wants to keep his job as Secretary of Ecclesia Dei.
Catholics however would then be aware of the deception of the CDF/Ecclesia Dei and how an injustice is being done to the SSPX for political reasons and doctrine and Vatican Council II was never an issue.
Catholic religious organizations, communities and movements on their own can affirm Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical. They can then affirm Vatican Council II and EENS( premise-free). It is rational,traditional and non heretical.-Lionel Andrades


OCTOBER 30, 2017

Double- speak continues with Ecclesia Dei and the CDF : Vatican Council II is not the real issue for the SSPX reconciliation

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/double-speak-continues-with-ecclesia.html

OCTOBER 30, 2017

Two popes must ask Franciscans, Domincians, Jesuits, Benedictines, Carmelites and other religious organisations and lay movements to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) and then do it themselves
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/two-popes-must-ask-franciscans.html

 OCTOBER 24, 2017


Someone needs to help Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Archbishop Pozzo and Archbishop Di Noia see how they use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council IIhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/someone-needs-to-help-cardinal-luiz.html

OCTOBER 23, 2017

Still no denial from Abp.Guido Pozzo : SSPX must accept Vatican Council II with a false doctrine and the new theology based on an irrational premise
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/still-no-denial-from-abpguido-pozzo.html

OCTOBER 20, 2017
No denial from Archbishop Guido Pozzo : he uses an irrational premise to reject the past exclusivist ecclesiology, the Syllabus of Errors and Vatican Council II(premise-free)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/no-denial-from-archbishop-guido-pozzo.html

OCTOBER 12, 2017
Five months and no concrete dialogue between the SSPX and Ecclesia Dei on Vatican Council II (premise-free) and EENS(premise-free)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/five-months-and-no-dialogue-between.html

Monday, October 30, 2017

Double- speak continues with Ecclesia Dei and the CDF : Vatican Council II is not the real issue for the SSPX reconciliation

Ecclesia Dei and I interpret Vatican Council II and all magisterial documents differently. What if I was an SSPX bishop for example, or what if an SSPX bishop interpreted the Council as I do, would it be acceptable for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
No.It would not be acceptable. Otherwise they would have informed me about it a long time back.
The issue was never Vatican Council II. The issue was always ideology.The SSPX had to accept the leftist ideology in the interpretation of magisterial documents and only then they could be given canonical status.
For me Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. For Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria it was always a rupture.
But they just couldn't create a rupture, there had to be a theological means.
So they accepted the false premise used in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.This changed the traditional interpretation on EENS.
They then interpreted the hypothetical cases in Vatican Council II as referring to known and objective people saved outside the Church.So LG 16 because a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted over the centuries. It was no more like it was   for the missionaries in the 16th century Pope Benedict confirmed it last year for any one who still had doubts.
I however have found out their mistake. I am not going into sedevacantism and nor am I going to be a traditionalist who rejects the Council since he does not want to accept a breach with Tradition( Syllabus of Errors etc).
So now if there was an SSPX bishop or priest at the St. Benedict Center or an FSSP priest who announced that they accept Vatican Council II just as I do.....it will not be acceptable.
The SSPX could state that Pope Benedict said that the issue was doctrinal and so they are now affirming Vatican Council II and they have been given permission to offer  the Latin Mass with Summorum Pontificum.
No way.
It has to be Vatican Council II in which LG 16 refers to visible people saved outside the Church even if practically there are no such cases.
So the Nicene Creed to has to be changed.
EENS has already been changed in the 1949 Letter with invisible for us baptism of desire etc being a visible exception to the dogma EENS.
This is how Cardinal Raymond Burke ,Joseph Shaw and the signatories of the Filial Correction interpret Vatican Council II.
In the 2012 General Chapter Statement the SSPX affirmed EENS without the irrational premise, it was a Feeneyite version of EENS and Ecclesia Dei did not announce that they had accepted it.
So now we know that Vatican Council II is not the real issue for the SSPX to receive  canonical status.The SSPX has to interpret invincible ignorance (LG 16) etc  as referring to known cases,visible people saved without 'faith and baptism'. So then LG 16 is a break with the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS, it is a rupture with the magisterium of the 16th century.This is how they do it at the Bishops Conferences world wide.It is only then that Vatican Council II will be acceptable to Cardinal Ladaria and Archbishops Pozzo and Di Noia.There has to be a hermeneutic of rupture while they in public speak of a hermeneutic of continuity.
In March 2016 Pope Benedict announced that there was a hermeneutic of rupture with EENS (Avvenire) and it was caused by 'the development' in Vatican Council II and all along he has been speaking about a possible hermeneutic of continuity with Vatican Council II.
-Lionel Andrades 


Poland: The Pope’s Troubling Silence on the “Rosary on the Borders”

news-header-image
On October 9, 2017, on the Italian website Occidentale, Assuntina Morresi hailed the Polish Catholics’ immense participation in Rosary on the Borders on October 7, and denounced the deafening silence with which the major media outlets shrouded this event.
“The popular participation in the rosary that was recited on Saturday along the Polish border was enormous; in 320 churches spread over more than 4,000 prayer zones, over a million Catholics were actually present, while many others throughout the entire world, whose numbers it would be impossible to count, united themselves to the recitation of the rosary. Rosary on the Borders was the name given to this act accomplished on the day the Church celebrates Our Lady of the Rosary, formerly known as Our Lady of Victory, in commemoration of the Christian victory at the battle of Lepanto on October 7, 1571, when the Ottoman enemy was conquered and minarets were kept from dominating Europe.
The pope at the time, St. Pius V, was the heart of this Christian coalition that won in Lepanto, and it was he who proclaimed this feast.

A Prayer for Poland and Europe

“Yesterday’s act was supported by the Polish Bishops’ Conference, and it was meant as a prayer for the Polish nation – hence the prayer on the borders – and for Europe, that she might protect and preserve the Christian Faith, the only possible solution for peace. In this sense, in these our times that are bloodied by Islamic terrorism and characterized by secularism, when calls for peace are often sectarian instruments or vague irenic dreams, this was a true, great, and sincere prayer for peace: with the recitation of the rosary, their Christian roots were publicly manifested.
An enormous act, as can be seen from the many photographs circulating online: organized crowds, praying everywhere, on the seaside, in the countryside, inside and outside of churches. It is particularly striking to see this long human chain praying with such a long rosary, with large (human) beads. These pictures were taken by many Italians, who went to the borders yesterday to recite the rosary with the Polish faithful, and then reported everything on social media. The newspapers and news channels completely ignored the event: only Antonio Socci consecrated an article to the event in the Libero, along with Joanna Berendt and Megan Specia on the other side of the Atlantic, in the New York Times. Today, two days later, La Repubblica has finally mentioned the event in its own way, with inexact facts and a title that is an agenda in itself: ‘Mass Exorcism against Islamic Migrants’. Someone should explain to La Repubblica, a newspaper that is so eager to dialogue with the pope, that prayer is not an exorcism ritual.
Today, some news is mentioned only online. Television and the paper press seem to be hopelessly programmed to describe a world that does not exist, or rather they persist in representing only a part of reality, a part that is becoming less and less significant and less representative of the real world, except when they give in to despair when facts do not prove them right or sales drop inexorably.”

Is the Pope Aware?

On October 12, on his website Rossoporpora, the Vaticanist Giuseppe Rusconi lamented the fact that Pope Francis, “although he had several opportunities to do so, never mentioned the great Catholic manifestation. But how is this possible? … He publicly hails the least group of parishioners, students, seminarians… He salutes associations of all sorts (with particular attention for those committed to the environment, immigration, and peace in the world) … but not a word! Completely ignored.
“Was he unaware of the great Polish Rosary? Theoretically, it is possible… but it is very hard to believe that not one of his collaborators informed him. Does he not care about what happened in Poland? Or rather, does he pretend not to care about what happened in Poland?
….
Is Pope Francis aware that he has deeply wounded millions of Catholics, and not only Polish Catholics, with his ostentatious lack of interest for the great Polish Rosary? Does he know what bitterness, what pain this caused? Is he aware of the consequences this could have?”Sources: loccidentale/rossoporpora/FSSPX.News – 10/27/2017
http://fsspx.news/en/news-events/news/poland-pope%E2%80%99s-troubling-silence-%E2%80%9Crosary-borders%E2%80%9D-33080

Due papi devono chiedere a Francescani, Dominciani, Gesuiti, Benedettini, Carmelitani e altre organizzazioni religiose e movimenti laici di affermare il Concilio Vaticano II (senza premessa) e poi farlo

Image result for Photo Sant Francesco Saverio
I due papi devono chiedere ai Francescani, Domenicani, Gesuiti, e Carmelitani ad altre comunità religiose di affermare il Concilio Vaticano II (senza premessa) anche loro due bisogno farlo.
I due papi devono chiedere tutti i Cattolici a affermare il Concilio Vaticano II e altri documenti magisteriali senza la invisibile- persone- e- visibile- premessa.
Image result for Photo Sant Francesco SaverioImage result for Photo Sant Francesco Saverio
In questo modo sappiamo che i due papi stanno affermando razionalmente i documenti Cattolici e non li interpreta con una filosofia e una teologia irrazionali. Devono chiedere alle comunità religiose, ai movimenti laici e alle organizzazioni Cattoliche di annunciare, che tutti i non cattolici hanno bisogno formalmente convertirsi nella Chiesa Cattolica con 'fede e battesimo' (AG 7, LG 14) e non esistono eccezioni conosciute nei tempi attuali (2017).
 L'invisibile- per- noi LumenGentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8, Unitatitis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2 ecc non può essere eccezioni.Questa è un'affermazione razionale del Concilio Vaticano II.È tradizionale e non eretica.
Image result for Photo San Francesco Saverio E rOMAImage result for Photo San Francesco Saverio E rOMA
In tempi presenti le comunità religiose, cardinali e vescovi e i laici in generale, rifiutano il Concilio Vaticano II(senza la premessa).Interpretandolo come una rottura con la Tradizione (extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Syllabo, ecumenismo di ritorno, Credo Atanasio ecc.) quando il Concilio ( senza-premessa) non è una rottura con passato.
Image result for Photo San Francesco Saverio E rOMAImage result for Photo San Francesco Saverio E cHIESA DI gESU
Pertanto i cattolici possono ancora essere invitati da Papa Francesco ad andare alle periferie e proclamare Gesù e la necessità di appartenere alla 'gerarchica Chiesa Cattolica' di Sant'Ignazio di Loyola. Tutti devono essere incorporati nella Chiesa Cattolica in come membri perchè fuori della Chiesa Cattolica non c'e salvezza conosciuta. Ogni uomo deve essere un Cattolico Romano per evitare i fuochi dell'inferno.
Le comunità religiose e laici Cattolici da soli, prendendo l'iniziativa, possono affermare il Concilio Vaticano II (senza premessa) in armonia con la precedente ecclesiologia esclusiva della Chiesa Cattolica. Ha una continuità con il Sillabo e un ecumenismo di ritorno.
Image result for Photo Sant Francesco Saverio
E eretica per Papa Francesco e Papa Benedetto per aspettarsi e di incoraggiare  cattolici interpretino il Concilio Vaticano II con Lumen Gentium 16 ecc,con casi ipotetici scambiati per non essere ipotetici,e poi supporre che questi  " visibili" non -cattolici siano salvati fuori della Chiesa, quando nessuno sa di tali persone.Nessuno sa di alcuna eccezione pratica al dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus nei tempi attuali.
Image result for Photo San Francesco Saverio E cHIESA DI gESUImage result for Photo Sant Francesco Saverio gOA bOM jESUS CATHEDRALImage result for Photo Sant Francesco Saverio gOA bOM jESUS CATHEDRAL
Con ipotetici casi interpretati come persone esplicite e conosciute salvate al di fuori della Chiesa, il Concilio Vaticano II indicherebbe erroneamente l'esistenza di eccezioni pratiche, agli insegnamenti di Gesù in Giov.3:5 (la necessità del battesimo d'acqua per la salvezza dall'inferno) e Mar.16:16 (coloro che non credono in Gesù, nell'unica Chiesa che ha fondato saranno condannati).Il Concilio Vaticano II indicerà.Il Concilio Vaticano II indicerà falso che ci sono eccezioni alla teologia passata della Chiesa.
-Lionel Andrades



OCTOBER 30, 2017

Image result for Photo of St.Francis Xavier


Two popes must ask Franciscans, Domincians, Jesuits, Benedictines, Carmelites and other religious organisations and lay movements to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) and then do it themselves

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/two-popes-must-ask-franciscans.html

Image result for Photo Sant Francesco Saverio

Commémoration des 500 ans du protestantisme. Des catholiques protestent et perturbent la cérémonie




Scandaloso video dei giovani portati fuori dalla Cattedrale di Bruxelles: recitavano il Rosario durante la commemorazione della riforma protestante


http://blog.messainlatino.it/2017/10/scandaloso-video-dei-giovani-portati.html

Gospel Reading at Mass today : He laid his hands on her,and she at once stood up straight and glorified God.

Gospel Lk 13:10-17

Jesus was teaching in a synagogue on the sabbath.
And a woman was there who for eighteen years
had been crippled by a spirit;
she was bent over, completely incapable of standing erect.
When Jesus saw her, he called to her and said,
"Woman, you are set free of your infirmity."
He laid his hands on her,
and she at once stood up straight and glorified God.

But the leader of the synagogue,
indignant that Jesus had cured on the sabbath,
said to the crowd in reply,
"There are six days when work should be done.
Come on those days to be cured, not on the sabbath day."
The Lord said to him in reply, "Hypocrites!
Does not each one of you on the sabbath
untie his ox or his ass from the manger
and lead it out for watering?
This daughter of Abraham,
whom Satan has bound for eighteen years now,
ought she not to have been set free on the sabbath day
from this bondage?"

When he said this, all his adversaries were humiliated;
and the whole crowd rejoiced at all the splendid deeds done by him.

JESUS (English) Healing on Sabbath of Woman Crippled by Evil Spirit
https://youtu.be/_80Xpyqibr0

The Touch
https://youtu.be/yArWsPS1ZU8



Two popes must ask Franciscans, Domincians, Jesuits, Benedictines, Carmelites and other religious organisations and lay movements to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) and then do it themselves

Image result for Photo of St.Francis Xavier
The two popes must ask the Franciscans, Dominicans, Jesuits, Carmelities and other religious communities to affirm Vatican Council II ( premise-free) and do it themselves.
The two popes need to ask the Franciscans, Benedictines and other religious communities, along with all lay movements, to interpret and affirm Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents without the invisible- people- are- visible- premise.
Image result for Photo of St.Francis Xavier
In this way we know that the two popes are affirming Catholic documents rationally and are not interpreting  them with an irrational philosophy and theology.They need to ask the religious communities, lay movements and all Catholic organizations,to announce that all non Catholics need to formally convert into the Catholic Church with faith and baptism (AG 7, LG 14)  and there are no known exceptions in the present times(2017).Invisible-for-us LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc cannot be exceptions.This is affirming Vatican Council II rationally. traditionally and non hermetically.Presently the religious communities, cardinals and bishops, and lay people in general are rejecting the Council by interpreting it as a rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, Athanasius Creed etc), when it is not really a rupture when Vatican Council II ( premise-free)is used.
Image result for Photo of St.Francis Xavier
So Catholics can still be asked by Pope Francis to go to the peripheries and proclaim Jesus and the necessity of membership in the hierarchical Catholic Church of St.Ignatius of Loyola.All need to be incorporated into the Catholic Church as members since outside the Church there is no known salvation.Every one needs to be a Roman Catholic to avoid the fires of Hell.
Religious communities and lay Catholics on their own can affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.It has a continuity with the Syllabus of Errors and an ecumenism of return.
Image result for Photo of St.Francis Xavier
Presently it is heretical for Pope Francis and Pope Benedict to expect Catholics to interpret Vatican Council II with LG 16 etc referring to non hypothetical cases, people allegedly saved outside the Church, when no one knows of any such person.Also with this irrationality, Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the missionaries and magisterium of the 16th century, for example.
With hypothetical cases being interpreted as explicit and known people saved outside the Church, Vatican Council II
would wronly suggest that there are practical exceptions, to Jesus' teachings in John 3:5 ( the necessity of the baptism of water for salvation from Hell) and Mark 16:16( those who do not believe in Jesus,in the only Church he founded will be condemned).
-Lionel Andrades


 OCTOBER 29, 2017

The New Evangelisation of the two popes is based on the Letter of the Holy Office, lay movements must observe. It is flawed.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/the-new-evangelisation-of-two-popes-is.html
Image result for Photo of St.Francis Xavier





Image result for Photo of St.Francis Xavier















Sunday, October 29, 2017

Dr.Robert Fastiggi cannot respond with the usual accusations

It's interesting.Dr.Robert Fastiggi cannot accuse me of being in schism or in sedevacantism and I am saying that he is in heresy.
He cannot accuse me of denying any of the magisterial documents of the Church and yet I say that I do not interpret magisterial documents like he does.
He cannot of course accuse me of rejecting Vatican Council II instead it is I who make the accusation against him.
He cannot accuse me of rejecting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Council of Florence.Instead it is I who make the accusation against me.
He can accuse me of not theologically following the present two popes.This would be true since the two popes  are not following the popes of the past and are in schism.
To not follow a theology is  a sin? Then it would be a sin for him.Since it is he who teaches a new theology based on a nonsenical premise which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction and which never was part of the deposit of the faith. The two popes do the same.
He has not responded to these blog posts which I have e-mailed him.
Even if he responds what is he going to say? Will he say that the Holy Spirit guides this magisterium to teach that there are known people saved outside the Church in the past and they are objective exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in the present times? So every one does not need to enter the Church in 2017.
Would this be a teaching inspired by the Holy Spirit?
Image result for Photos Archbishop of Detroit with Rector of the seminary
But the reality is that as a professor of theology in the Archdiocese of Detroit he cannot state that all non Catholics with no exception need to be formal members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell? 
So he is stuck.
He cannot honestly accuse me of being in schism as he did with Bishop Sanborn who affirmed EENS and was saying every non Catholic in Detroit are hell-bound unless they convert formally into the Church to save their soul.
At the same time he cannot rationally say that he knows someone in Detroit who is a practical exception to the dogma EENS as it is held by Bishop Donald Sanborn.
Bishop Sanborn accused him of being in heresy,like the rest of the Church, for discarding the ecumenism of return with the new ecumenism of non return.There was no denial from Dr.Fastiggi.I think this point went above his head.
He could only fall back on saying the bishop was in schism and this was a mortal sin. Now I am saying the same thing as the good bishop.But he cannot shrug me off so easily.I am not a sede.
Image result for Photos Its different this time
I accept the two popes. Pope Francis is my pope in manifest mortal sin and is automatically excommunicated. Like Fastiggi he does not affirm the Nicene Creed, EENS , Vatican Council II and the Catechisms without the irrational premise and so his conclusions are not traditional and Catholic.It is the same with Pope Benedict.They need to go for Confession and affirm de fide teachings of the Church which are obligatory for all of us.
Of course all this is not permanent and fixed. Both the popes can issue a clarification and affirm Catholic doctrine without the irrational premise which creates heresy, and all will be well again.Theologically they are back on an even keel.
I write all this not just to criticize any one but so that they acknowledge their error and make the correction.
Image result for Photos Ralph Martin Sacred Heart
But I ask myself how is Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi going to make the correction at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary Detroit? 
Is it possible in the future that they will be allowed to interpret all magisterial documents without the invisible people are visible premise and so affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus like Bishop Donald Sanborn?
For now, here I am a Catholic, a good Catholic who is not a traditionalist like the SSPX priests who correctly reject Vatican Council II (with the premise) but do not affirm the Council interpreted without the irrational premise,as I do.
Then I do not say that I reject the pope since the pope is in heresy.Since for me most Catholics are in innocent heresy due to ignorantly following these two popes.
For now while I affirm Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical, which makes the Council traditional and exclusive on salvation Dr. Robert Fastiggi is unable to correct me or even reply.It is the same with the Rector at Sacred Heart, Detroit.
-Lionel Andrades




OCTOBER 29, 2017


The New Evangelisation of the two popes is based on the Letter of the Holy Office, lay movements must observe. It is flawed.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/the-new-evangelisation-of-two-popes-is.html


OCTOBER 28, 2017


Faculty at Sacred Heart Major Seminary agree there are no known cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance in 2017

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/faculty-at-sacred-heart-major-seminary.html


OCTOBER 28, 2017

There is an in principle error in the text of Vatican Council II and Dr.Robert Fastiggi is not aware of it

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/there-is-in-principle-error-in-text-of.html


OCTOBER 25, 2017


Heresy before Vatican II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/heresy-before-vatican-ii.html

OCTOBER 25, 2017


Protocol 122/49 was written in specific contradistinction to Fr. Feeney’s statement that all who die as non-Catholics are lost

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/protocol-12249-was-written-in-specific.html


OCTOBER 25, 2017


If Pope Pius XII had come to the defense of Father Feeney in the early 1950’s, and reasserted that all who die as non-Catholics are lost (and therefore must be converted), there would never have been a Vatican II.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/if-pope-pius-xii-had-come-to-defense-of.html