SSPX can ask for canonical status rejecting Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) and accepting Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) : this is not important ?

Comment on Gloria TV:

Dr.Stuart Reiss

If the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) interprets Vatican Council II with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism they can affirm Vatican Council II and also assure their supporters that they are not rejecting Tradition.Then they can ask for canonical status.



Rejecting Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) and accepting Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is the key and you think this is not important?

If the sedevacantists Bishop Donald Sanborm, MHFM,CMRI and others , interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism instead of their present Cushingism, the Council would be traditional and there would be no need for them to remain in sedevacantism established on Vatican Council II(Cushingism). For you this is not important?

At all Catechism and RCIA classes Vatican Council II is being interpreted with irrational Cushingism instead of rational Feeneyism as a theology.This can change.For you this is not important?

In March 2016 in the Avvenire interview, Pope Benedict XVI said that extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century, since there was a development with Vatican Council II (Cushingite).If Pope Benedict would interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism there would be no 'development' and EENS would be like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century. The ecclesiology of the Catholic Church would be the same before and after Vatican Council II.This is not important for you ?

The pope would then have to say that all non Catholics in 2017 need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation and there are is no known salvation outside the Church as he believed and taught all these years.This is not important?-L.A

Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reasoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.It is practical. There obviously are no known cases of the baptism of desire (BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) in 2017.So there are no practical exceptions to EENS.Neither was BOD,BOB and I.I an exception to Feeneyite EENS in 1949 when the Letter of the Holy Office was issued to the Archbishop of Boston. The cardinals made an objective mistake.Similarly mentioning BOD and I.I in Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14) relative to the traditional teaching on salvation was superfluous.

Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning.It assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.

eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/palermo-catholi…

https://gloria.tv/article/2rnHyCkZ2UuuAZTmfPxRux78P/postings/