Sunday, August 6, 2017

Society of St.Pius X must revive Reconciliation Talks with the Vatican : VC II (Feeneyite) is a breakthrough

Image result for Photos of  Bernard Fellay at the CDF building
The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) must revive Reconciliation Talks with the Vatican.Ask  them if they will  accept Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) proposed and explained on this blog Eucharist and Mission.Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j,Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican must be asked to consider the possibility of there being no practical exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in 2017. There were none in 1949 or 1960-1965.
So there can be none mentioned in Vatican Council II.
In Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) there are no exceptions to the 'past ecclesiology' of the Church.
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective error when it wrongly suggested that the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) were visible for us, to be exceptions to the traditional interpretation of EENS.
So without the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston,Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyite philosophy( invisible people are not visible) and theology( invisible people and hypothetical cases cannot be objective exceptions to Feeneyite EENS).LG 16 (invisible) is no more relevant to EENS.
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) would not contradict EENS ( Feeneyite) and the Syllabus of Errors  of Pope Pius IX.
It would not contradict the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994) interpreted with Feeneyism i.e hypothetical cases are simply hypothetical and they are not objective exceptions to the dogma EENS in the present times(2017).CCC 1257 (The Necessity of Baptism) would not contradict itself.Every one needs the baptism of water for salvation and we do not know any case in which God is not limited to the Sacraments.Every one needs the baptism of water for salvation and 'God is not limited to the Sacraments' refers to a hypothetical and unknown case for us.
So this is a new opening for the SSPX.It permits the SSPX to affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) in harmony with the the SSPX General Chapter Doctrinal Statement of 2012, which was Feeneyite on EENS.
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) would be in harmony with EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.There would be no 'development' with the Council.
All Catholics, all Catholic religious communities and also the CDF and Ecclesia Dei could affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).
Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) would not be in contradiction to St. Thomas Aquinas when he refers to BOD, BOB and I.I.Since it would be a reference to a theoretical and not a practical case.
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) would not contradict Quanta Cura,Mistici Corporis, the Catechisms of Trent, Baltimore and Pius X,  when  BOD, BOB and I.I are referred to.Since it would be a reference to invisible people in their times.They are not relevant or exceptions to EENS.They never ever were exceptions.The confusion was created by the Letter of the Holy Ofice 1949 relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney which has been accepted by Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX.
If the liberal bishops' conferences in Europe and the USA will not affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) then Pope Francis should no longer make the Council  an issue for the reconciliation of the SSPX.
When the SSPX and the ecclesiastics in the Vatican Curia, affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) they would have put Vatican Council II away as a divisive condition.The SSPX and the Franciscans of the Immaculate can be regularised and there can be an out reach to the sedevacantist who have split because of the interpretation of the Council.-Lionel Andrades

No comments: