Sunday, August 27, 2017

Appeal to Pope Francis to allow Catholics to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS without the irrational premise


Image result for Photo Pope Francis and Amoris Laetitia











Catholic journalists, traditionalists and concerned Catholics must appeal to the two popes and the cardinals at the CDF/Ecclesia Dei to clarify that invisible for us baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are not visible for us in 2017.So there never ever were exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra eccclesiam nulla salus(EENS). The Vatican can also clarify that LG 16,LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 11, AG 7 etc refer to hypothetical cases for us human beings. So Vatican Council II cannot be an exception to the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.
As I mentioned in the previous blog post Ratzinger, Muller, and Ladaria have been interpreting possibilities and hypothetical cases as being concrete exceptions to the dogma EENS which they have rejected.
Cardinal Ratzinger did not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre  that without this false premise (invisible people are visible) Vatican Council II was a not a rupture with EENS. Image result for Archbishop Lefebvre
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was rejecting Vatican Council II with the false premise.He was correct.The Council interpreted with the false premise was producing a non traditional and false conclusion which was a rupture with EENS as it was interpreted over the centuries.
Cardinal Ratzinger was either not aware of the mistake or he was aware of the theological and doctrinal mistake the magisterium was making but did not want to correct it. Instead he excommunicated Archbishiop Lefebvre when he consecrated the four bishops of the SSPX.
An appeal needs to be made to Pope Francis to announce that 1) BOD, BOB and I.I are not exceptions to the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century or to Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
2) There is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the rigorist interpretation of the dogma EENS since LG 16 etc refer to hypothetical and theoretical cases and not real people saved outside the Church.There can be no known salvation outside the Church in 2017.
Pope Francis must affirm the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS and also Vatican Council II which is not a break with the dogma EENS as it was interpreted by the missionaries in the 16th century.
Appeal to him to permit the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) and all Catholics to proclaim EENS as it was known to the Jesuits in the 16th century and to also endorse Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of continuity with  the exclusivist ecclesiology of St. Francis Xavier, St. Ignatius Loyola and the Jesuit missionaries.
Tell him to please clarify that the magisterium made an objective mistake in the interpretation of the dogma EENS in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case and in the interpretation of Vatican Council with the false premise, from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.Lionel Andrades

AUGUST 27, 2017
CDF Prefects do not know their job : Lefebvre and Feeney's excommunication was a mistake
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/cdf-prefects-do-not-know-their-job.html



No comments: