Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi, professors of theology at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary,Detroit,accept all magisterial documents, but with the theology of Cushingism.This is the wide spread Arian- like heresy in the Church.It makes Vatican Council II a rupture with Tradition. Without this Cushingite theology the Council has a continuity with the past.
They both now agree I mentioned in a previous post that hypothetical and invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), and blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance of the Gospel through no fault of one own(I.I) are not physically visible cases in 2017.Invisible people are not visible.So they cannot be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).They never were.
A theoretical possibility or hypothesis is not a concrete and known exception in the present times to all needing to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid the fires of Hell.
The two professors indicate by their silence, in e-mail communication I have with them, that the present magisterium has made an objective mistake.Since the magisterium accepts the Cushingite theology, the New Theology, based on BOD, BOB and I.I being visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.1
The magisterium has made a mistake, an objective mistake, a factual mistake.
Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi will not directly say the magisterium, the popes, have made a mistake and neither will they defend the New Theology and the magisterium.They keep silent and read what I write.
This mistake is there in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994) too.It mentions being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), the baptism of desire(BOD) and baptism of blood(BOB) which were and are, really irrelevant to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the old ecclesiology of the Church.So they should not have been mentioned.They are superflous.
So when we read the Catechism, all references to BOD, BOB and I.I, we have to note, refer to hypothetical cases.Invisible people.
This is how we have to read Vatican Council II too.
To assume BOD, BOB and I.I are relevant or exceptions to the dogma EENS, is an objective error and so cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.If the error was made in the Baltimore Catechism it still is an objective error.
The Holy Spirit cannot make a mistake in the Catechism or in Vatican Council II.This is human error.
Invisible for us baptism of desire was never a visible exception to the dogma EENS now even Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi agree.They were never exceptions to the dogma EENS said Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson.Zero cases of something are not exceptions says the apologist John Martignoni.They are supported by Fr.Stefano Visintin osb, the new Rector of the University of St. Anselm, Rome.
For Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and Cardinal Christopher Schonborn zero cases of something were exceptions, when they put together the Catechism approved by the liberals and the Left. They did not correct the philosophical error in Vatican Council II but consolidated it.
-Lionel Andrades
1.
July 24, 2017
April 25, 2017
Bishop Robert C.Morlino needs to interpret the Catechism with Feeneyism then the laity can do the same in study groups
Parish priests will not allow the Catechism to be interpreted with the theology of Feeneyism. They could be suspended or transferred.
APRIL 24, 2017
Until Fr.Zuhlsdorf or a bishop affirms the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism lay Catholics have to affirm the Faith independently and with the opposition of the local Cushingite bishop
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/until-frzuhlsdorf-or-bishop-affirms.html
APRIL 24, 2017
APRIL 24, 2017
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment