That the baptism of desire is invisible and not physically visible is a great secret of Cardinal Ladaria and others at the Vatican.For them this is very important information to hide

That the baptism of desire is invisible and not physically visible is a  great secret of Cardinal Ladaria and others at the Vatican.For them this is  very important information to hide.

Presently every one is interpreting the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) as referring to known cases.So it is inferred that there are exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. This was the thinking in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which has been accepted by the magisterium.

But what if Cardinal Ladaria knows that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to invisible and not visible cases.

This would mean LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases, theoretical cases. They are not objectively known in 2017.

It would then mean that there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

Nothing in Vatican Council to contradict EENS according to St. Robert Bellarmine and the missionaries of the 16th century ?

This would be shocking for the bishops' conferences in the USA, U.K, Germany, Italy,Australia etc.

It would mean that we are back to the old ecclesiology of the Church. This would be unacceptable for all of them.

This would be unthinkable over the last few months or even years.It's still unthinkable for some who are informed about it today.

So now Cardinal Luiz Ladaria is not going to announce,just as Cardinal Muller did not announce, the obvious.He will not proclaim that  there are only invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I. So there are no exceptions to the old ecclesiology based on Feeneyite EENS and expressed in the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012.

So if Vatican Council II is now interpreted in harmony with Tradition and the SSPX General Chapter Statement,which supports Feeneyite EENS,  this would be a crisis for Cardinal Ladaria.It would be a crisis for Pope Benedict and all whom he represents.

The SSPX and the sedevacantists would now be in the driving seat. The Council would no more be an issue for them. They can affirm the Council without the irrationality.

So what does Cardinal Ladaria do in the face of so many reports on the Internet on this issue? He keeps quiet. He does not respond. It would be a disaster if Catholics understood that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to invisible cases.So they never ever were relevant to the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.
There is no development of the dogma EENS with Vatican Council II as Pope Benedict wrongly announced in March 2016 if the baptism of desire refers to invisible cases.

It is important that the SSPX religious and lay people understand this.The whole issue is hinged on invisible baptism of desire being mistaken for being visible.Then with this irrationality a rupture is created with Tradition.

Without the irrationality there is no rupture with Tradition.The SSPX can look at Vatican Council II in a new way.This is only possible if the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to invincible  ignorance.
All they have to know is that invisible BOD, BOB and I.I are simply invisible -and then announce it in public.-Lionel Andrades

JULY 5, 2017

To accomodate the error of visible baptism of desire Cardinal Ratzinger changed the Profession of Faith, Oath of Fidelity and Canon Law

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/to-accomodate-error-of-visible-baptism.html