Friday, April 21, 2017

Answers to the dubbia on salvation and moral theology would show Cascioli that Pope Benedict made a mistake

Answers  to 'Riccardo Cascioli could ask Pope Benedict XVI these five questions : dubbia on moral and salvation theology'

Image result for questions and answers Photo
Riccardo Cascioli could ask Pope Benedict XVI five questions, a dubbia on moral and salvation theology related to Amoris Laetitia, I mentioned in a previous blog post. Here are the five questions again but with my answers to them.
The Lay Conference in Rome on Saturday tomorrow organized by La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana and Il Timone whose director is Riccardo Cascioli, could ask Pope Benedict these five questions.My answers will help clarify the issue for Cascioli.
In answering these questions with integrity Pope Benedict XVI would be saying that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism and then the Council would not be a rupture with Tradition; it would not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nullas salus, Syllabus of Errors, the old ecclesiology on ecumenism, inter-religious dialogue, the non separation of Church and State and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.
Image result for Photos of  earthquake tremorsImage result for photo of Pope Benedict XVIThis would be a theological earthquake in the Catholic Church.
All this is based on the correct interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
 timone
Pope Benedict would also be admitting that he and the magisterium made an objective mistake all these years in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, with Cushingism.
Pope Benedict made a mistake in March 2016 when he said that extra ecclesiam nulla salus was no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries, since there was a development with Vatican Council II. The 'development' emerges only when  Cushingism is used as an interpretation.
 









In principle philosophical subjectivism is being used in by the two popes ,in salvation and moral theology. It is irrational.Cushingism is irrational
Since there is known salvation outside the Church for the present magisterium, the new ecumenism and the theology of religions, is supported by the Vatican.
1.Cushingism as a philosophy ( invisible cases are physically visible, invisible baptism of desire is visible) and Cushingism as a theology( physically visible cases of the baptism of desire are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus,so there is salvation outside the Catholic Church) is approved and is official?
Lionel: Yes.It is official, it is magisterial in 2017.
_________________________
2. Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the theology of Cushingism instead of Feeneyism ( invisible cases are physically invisible, invisible baptism of desire is not visible).So the Council emerges as a rupture with Tradition, in particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite); as it was known in the 16th century ?
Lionel: Yes only with Cushingism does Vatican Council II emerge as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known in the 16th century.
________________________
3.In principle, philosophical subjectivism can be used in the interpretation of salvation (invisible cases of the baptism of desire can be detected) and morals ( Catholics in manifest mortal sin are given the Eucharists in exceptional cases since it can be judged) ?
Lionel: In principle philosophical subjectivism is being used in the salvation and moral theology. It is irrational.Cushingism is irrational.
________________________
4.Since it is assumed that there is known salvation outside the visible boundaries of the Church the new ecumenism and a Christian Theology of Religious Pluralism can be accepted ?
Lionel: Since there is known salvation outside the Church for the present magisterium the new ecumenism and the theology of religions is promoted by the Vatican.
__________________________
5. Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (n.846) can be interpreted with Feeneyism ( invisible cases are invisible,they are not physically seen; the baptism of desire is invisible.It cannot be an exception to the dogma EENS.So CCC 846 does not contradict Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus).Then there is no salvation outside the Church as it was known to the 16th century magisterium and missionaries?
Lionel: Yes if Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church is interpreted with Feeneyism then the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is the same today, as it was for the magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century.The interpretation of the dogma on salvation and the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church will not have changed.-Lionel Andrades
1.
Riccardo Cascioli could ask Pope Benedict XVI these five questions : dubbia on moral and salvation theology













No comments: