Rome Mayor must ask university professors to avoid deception and not lie : academically unethical.

Secular universities in Rome use a false reason and logic to change Catholic theology and doctrine.This is unethical academically and the Mayor of Rome,Virginia Raggi could correct it.

She could answer the two questions and ask the faculty at universities in Rome to be honest too.

Here are the two questions.
 

TWO QUESTIONS 

1) Do we personally know the dead now saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc, can we see them, are they physically visible to us in 2017, can we meet such people ?

2) Since we do not know any of these cases in real life, they are not physically visible, there are no known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or Ad Gentes 7 which states 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for 'salvation' ?
 

RATIONAL ANSWER

The rational answer is that 1) we personally cannot see or meet someone in 2017 saved as such and 2) since  there are no such cases in our reality, there is no known exception to the dogma dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II.

IRRATIONAL ANSWER  

The irrational reasoning used in Rome's universities are 1) there are personally known cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience etc, without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church  and so 2) there are known exceptions in 2017 to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II.

The irrational reasoning I call Cushingism. The philosophy is Cushingite.
The rational philosophy I call Feeneyism.It says there are no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).There are no practical exceptions.

Irrational Cushingism ( philosophy) creates an irrational Cushingite theology( every one does not need to enter the Church in the present times since there are known exceptions to the dogma EENS).

Rational Feeneyite philosophy concludes in the traditional Feeneyite theology, the old ecclesiology of the Church.
 

PROFESSORS USE IRRATIONAL CUSHINGISM

At Rome's secular universities the professors use Cushingite philosophy to create a new Cushingite theology.

So Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) emerges as a rupture with the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite) and Catholic teachings in general.This is the result of a falsehood.

The professors at secular universities suggest that there are known cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance and without being a member of the Catholic Church.This is false. There are no such cases.But they have to pretend that invisible cases are visible.This is their lie.
 

DISHONESTY OF PROFESSORS

For the professors, whatever are their personal religious views, this is not the issue here - they should not use a false premise to create a new theology.This is dishonesty.At issue is the false premise created by assuming invisible cases are visible, what is hypothetical is considered defacto known and concrete.
The professors violate the Principle of Non Contradiction of Aristotele.They infer that we humans can physically see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.A strange inference is then followed by a non traditional conclusion.This is not professional or ethical.How can we objectively  see or know of people saved in Heaven without the baptism of water? What are the names of these people seen as such in 2017 ? There are none.
 

SUBTERFUGE NOT PROFESSIONAL

The Mayor may not be a practising Catholic:She approved the homosexual union law and so her political party in exchange were given the Mayoral post.They sold their soul to the devil.She sinned and is now assured of a place in Hell.She may support the conclusion of the false premise of the professors.This  may have also been her formation as a Catholic. However to secretly use this subterfuge is not professional according to secular standards in Italy.

As a professional lawyer, she is asked to maintian professional standards.Ask the professors  of the universities in Rome not to tell lies.Ask them to affirm the two questions rationally. 
 

I AFFIRM FEENYITE VATICAN COUNCIL II

I affirm Feeneyite philosophy and theology. So Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is not an exception to the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite). Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.

 

I REJECT VATICAN COUNCIL II CUSHINGITE

I reject Vatican Council II, Cushingite. Since there are no known exceptions to the dogma EENS in 2017 for me.I cannot see someone saved with the baptism of desire on the streets of Rome. For me there is only EENS (Feeneyite).Since this is how it was known to the three Church Councils and the saints and popes, who did not mix up what is invisible as being visible.
 

LA SAPIENZA FACULTY

The Mayor could please ask the Faculty of Jurisprudence at the La Sapienza University, for example, to clarify that there are no visible cases seen or known in 2017 of people saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire ( with or without the baptism of water). Ask them to clarify that they cannot see ghosts at the Campidoglio. This is something obvious.It is common sense.We cannot see people on earth or in Heaven.This is possible only for God.
 

CATHOLIC CANON LAW

So the faculty members at La Sapienza's Jurisprudence Department,according to their belief as Catholics, or when they teach Catholic Canon Law, must not  use the irrational premise to present a new version of Catholic theology and doctrine.They can believe what they want but clarify that they are using an irrational premise in their philosophical reasoning.

The professors now are not only irrational and un-ethical but they contradictsthe Catholic dogma EENS( Feeneyite) as it was known to the pope who founded La Sapienza University.
 

OBJECTIVE MISTAKE IN LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE 1949

They also ignore the objective mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney which was unfortunately carried over into the text of Vatican Council II ( LG 16, AG 7, LG 14, UR 3 etc).

The Mayor of Rome could also ask the Muslim Mayor in London to stop this same irrationality at the Kings College London and other British universities,who interpret the same text from Vatican Council II ( LG 16, AG 7, LG 14, UR 3 etc) with Cushingism when there is a Feeneyite rational and traditional choice.

 

DO NOT CLARIFY CHURCH TEACHING

I repeat that I am not asking the Mayor to clarify Catholic teaching or to defend it but to clarify that a false philosophical premise is being used in secular universities of Rome.This is  misleading for the public.It has practical consequences.This is a philosophical issue which affects theology and belief.
 

I AFFIRM CHURCH DOCUMENTS WITH FEENEYITE THEOLOGY

I also would like to clarify that I follow the present magisterium in only Church documents in 2017 ( Vatican Council II,Extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Catechism of the Catholic Church etc). I also affirm the magisterium of Church texts of the past ( Church Fathers, Medieval Fathers etc) and the hierarchy of those times, the papal authorities.
 

I AFFIRM MAGISTERIUM OF DOCUMENTS AND NOT PEOPLE

On this issue I am not following the magisterium of people  of the present times ( Vatican Curia 2017) which has rejected a) the magisterium of the Church documents and b) the magisterium of the people (popes) of the past, who were Feeneyites.The present magisterium rejects the Magisterium of the past centuries e.g 16th century.

For me hypothetical cases mentioned  in Vatican Council II (LG16,LG14,LG8,NA 2 etc) and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (baptism of desire and blood and invincible ignorance) are not exceptions to EENS.This should be common knowledge for the professors.It is something obvious.

LUMEN GENTIUM, GAUDIUM ET SPECS REFER TO HYPOTHETICAL CASES 

I affirm Gaudium et Specs 22, Vatican Council II and Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance) but for me they refer to hypothetical cases, theoretical possibilities known only to God.So for me Vatican Council II does not contradict the absolutist interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus( outside the Church there is no salvation).
 

I DO NOT REJECT VATICAN COUNCIL II LIKE THE TRADITIONALISTS.

Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is in harmony with EENS ( Feeneyite) for me.So I do not have to support the traditionalists and sedevacantist position on Vatican Council II.I am a simple Catholic. I do not reject the Council.
According to Prof.Stefano Visintin osb the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance cannot be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. He is the Vice Rector of the Pontifical University of St.Anslem in Rome.
Zero cases of something cannot be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus said the American apologist John Martignoni who has an apologetics program on the Catholic TV Network EWTN.
The Americn Archbishop, Thomas E. Gullickson, who has been appointed  Nuncio to Switzerland and Liechtenstein by Pope Francis, agrees with them- and me. -Lionel Andrades

MARCH 5, 2017

Secular universities in Rome lie on Catholic theology and doctrine - unethical for Academics http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/secular-universities-in-rome-lie-on.html

English universities present a lie on Catholic theology and doctrine - unethical for academics

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/english-universities-present-lie-on.html