Bishop Fellay will not accept Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) nor ask the two popes to do the same : wants to stay with Vatican Council II (Cushingism)

Bishop Fellay will not accept Vatican Council II Feeneyite nor ask the two popes to affirm Vatican Council II Feeneyism.He wants to stay as they are with Vatican Council II Cushingism

... “there is one condition sine qua non, namely, that we can stay as we are.” [my emphasis] Without this assurance, says Fellay, “we will not do anything.” For, the SSPX still has some “grave criticisms” concerning what has happened “in the Church since Vatican II”; as representative topics, for example, the Swiss bishop mentions the practical “integration of Communism”; “Religious Liberty”; the “relationship between Church and State”; and the question of toleration of other religions, one of which is today is to be seen, more and more, in the context and presence of “terror.” It now seems to Fellay that “we go in the right direction” and that, by way of alleviation of the pressure, “Rome has lifted a foot for two years now.” This apparently new attitude of Rome implies that some disputed questions concerning the Second Vatican Council are not strictly related to the binding “criteria of Catholicity.” Fellay explains: “That means that one has the right not to be in agreement [with some aspects of the Second Vatican Council] but still be considered to be Catholic.”-Bishop Fellay on SSPX Regularization: “There is One Condition…”-Maike Hickson

Lionel:

Bishop Fellay is saying that he wants the SSPX to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism and that he will not accept Vatican Council II Cushingism, as is being sought by Pope Francis. Also he and the SSPX will not accept Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) nor ask the two popes to affirm Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).

So all the SSPX bishops,priests and lay supporters are to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism and will not contradict Archbishop Lefebvre and interpret Vatican Council II with rational and traditional Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).

He will not ask Rome to come back to the Catholic Faith as Archbishop Lefebvre sought.Since if the two popes acceped Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) then the Vatican would have come back to the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.

However it would also mean Archbishop Lefebvre, Dietrich von Hildebrand, Roberto De Mattei and other traditionalists had made an error and were unaware of it.

So the priority his 'staying as we are' which is a rejection of tradtional extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) which is replaced by them, with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Cushingite).This is the dogma mentioned in March 2016 by Pope Benedict in the Avvenire interview. He said that the dogma was no more like it was in the 16th century.S

The priority for the SSPX is to reject Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) which supports the old ecclesiocentrism:The Council would them be in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite). Since with Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) there is no change in the traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Church, there is no change in ecumenism, inter-religious dialogue, Social Reign of Christ the King, non separation of Church and State etc.

So staying as we  are means the Nicene Creed will no more refer to one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins, for Bishop Fellay, but it would refer to three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins,water, blood, desire.All are visible and known baptisms in 2017 like the baptism of water, which can be seen or repeated.

It means rejecting the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995) by interpreting CCC 1257 and 846 with Cushingism and as a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite).It also means not affirming the Catechism of the Catholic Church(Feeneyite) in which 'God is not limited to the Sacraments' refers to hypothetical cases and so are not exceptions to the traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite).

Also affirming the Catechism of the Catholic Church(Feeneyite) means all who are saved are saved through Jesus Christ (CCC 846 Outside the Church no salvation) takes into account, being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire without the baptism of water, as being hypothetical and invisible cases and so not being objective are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) and the Syllabus of Errors.

This apparently new attitude of Rome implies that some disputed questions concerning the Second Vatican Council are not strictly related to the binding “criteria of Catholicity.” Fellay explains: “That means that one has the right not to be in agreement [with some aspects of the Second Vatican Council] but still be considered to be Catholic.”-Maike Hickson

It could also mean that the Vatican Curia (CDF/Ecclesia Dei) knows that Vatican Council II (Feeneyism) can be interpreted without the irrtational premise and the Council would really be traditional and no more politically correct.So they are willing to settle for silence on Vatican Council II from Bishop Fellay since he is ignorant about Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).

So the CDF is taking advantage of the SSPX.The SSPX bishops do not know of the subtle new theology which has changed traditional doctrine.They are not aware of the precise philosophical error which is responsible for the new theology used by the SSPX and the Vatican.

The new theology is not permanent.The Church can return back to the old doctrine on ecumenism etc if the theology is identified and avoided but the SSPX has not done this.Even Bishop Richard Williamson and Bishop Athanasius Schneider are not aware of it.

Inspite of so many reports on this blog which have been available on line there is the old ignorance among the traditionalists and sedevacantists.

They have had no comment on the statement by Bishop Thomas E.Gullickson.He has said that the baptism of desire etc are not explicit and so are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So for him Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) would not be a rupture with Tradition and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite).He called on the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II but obviously it was not Vatican Council II(Cushingism) but Vatican Council II without the irrational premise of visible for us baptism of desire.

Similarly the SSPX has ignored the present Vice Rector of the University of St.Anselm Rome, Fr.Stefano Visintin osb.When he was the the Dean of Theology at the Benedictine University in Rome, he  said that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

For Bishop Fellay they are exceptions.Also for the two popes they are exceptions. So with this irrationality they intepret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition. The SSPX rejects this Vatican Council II (Cushingism) and the two popes accept it, this is where they both want to stay where they are .-Lionel Andrades

Two popes irrational and in heresy : Archbishop Gullickson, Fr.Visintin osb correct http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/01/two-popes-irrational-and-in-heresy.html