Monday, December 26, 2016

Sedevacantist -traditionalist modernist



TradCatKnight: Catholics Are Hostage To The Modernist’s”  By: Eric Gajewski

https://gloria.tv/article/EadzCya6Cv8B27RstAMAk6Lb3
The modernist is not going to tell you he is preaching a new gospel or that he has gone off the track as it relates to the mission of a Christian. No, that is not going to happen. Their view is distorted yet they do not see it that way. They see what they are saying and indicate it corresponds to Tradition and it does not (clearly)-.Eric Gajewski 
Eric Gajewski (TradCatKnight) does not realize that most of the modernism related to Vatican Council II comes from choosing one of the two wrong premises. Eric interprets Vatican Council II with a premise which is irrational and different from mine. It is the same premise of the modernist liberals -and the 'traditionalists'.
From my perspective he is a modernist though he does not know the specific cause of his modernism.The liberal-modernists use the same irrational premise as Eric  does and they accept the conclusion.Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition for them.
He uses the same premise and does not accept the conclusion. Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition and so he rejects the Council and goes into sedevacantism.
I do not use that premise and the conclusion is different. Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Tradition and I accept the Council but not for the same reason as the liberals. -Lionel Andrades

http://tradcatknight.blogspot.it/

The Council Fathers at Vatican Council II, according to the text of the Council, wrongly assumed hypothetical cases were not hypothetical

There are too many fundamental and objective mistakes in Vatican Council II and it confused Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and members  the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.They chose an irrational premise to interpret the Council when a rational option was available.

The Council Fathers at Vatican Council II, according to the text of the Council, wrongly assumed hypothetical cases were not hypothetical.
They wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance referred to visible cases, when they could have chosen to see the obvious,that they are invisible cases.
So when I interpret Vatican Council II with  references to invisible cases being invisible my conclusion is traditional.While the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition, since in their premise they assume invisible cases are visible.
Cardinal Ratzinger did not notice this error and has repeated it in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
The new theology of Cardinal Ratzinger, Fr.Karl Rahner and Fr.Hans Kung is based upon mixing up what is hypothetical as being defacto and known in the present times.
This was the error of Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston and the U.S Jesuits in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case. The error was not corrected by Pope Pius XII.Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani, who issued the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, like Cardinal  Ottaviani, mixed up what is invisible as being visible.
They magisterium did not support Fr. Leonard Feeney.His excommunication was not lifted even in 1960-65.So the objective mistake in philosophy is there in many places in Vatican Council II (LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc).The Council can be interpreted with two different premises.
This cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.Instead it is human error.
Even the traditionalists too, like the liberals and sedevacantists today make the same philosophical error and there is doctrinal confusion among those who attend the Traditional Latin Mass.
-Lionel Andrades


In Ecclesia di Eucharistia the influence of the irrational premise is there : rupture with two-thousand year history

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/in-ecclesia-di-eucharistia-influence-of.html



DECEMBER 26, 2016


The difference between Cardinal Ratzinger and me : one of us is in heresy

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/the-difference-between-cardinal.html

DECEMBER 24, 2016


In Dominus Iesus Cardinal Ratzinger repeats mistakes of Redemptoris Missio :irrational philosophy creates non traditional theology (Gloria tv)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/in-dominus-iesus-cardinal-ratzinger_28.html


DECEMBER 23, 2016


Catholics cannot believe that Cardinal Ratzinger made a major mistake

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/catholics-cannot-believe-that-cardinal.html

DECEMBER 23, 2016


Cardinal Ratzinger made an objective mistake in Redemptoris Missio

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/cardinal-ratzinger-made-objective.html


DECEMBER 22, 2016


Card.Ratzinger's error in the ITC papers is also there in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/cardratzingers-error-in-itc-papers-is.html

DECEMBER 22, 2016


Cardinal Ratzinger 's work : a rupture between faith and reason

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/cardinal-ratzinger-s-work-rupture.html

DECEMBER 21, 2016


Magisterium in rebellion

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/magisterium-in-rebellion.html


DECEMBER 18, 2016


It's un- precedented in over 50 years. All the reports on Vatican Council II have not reported on this.Philosophical error runs through the Council text

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/its-un-precedented-in-over-50-years-all.html

 DECEMBER 18, 2016


When I meet a non Catholic on the streets I know he is on the way to Hell since he could not be in the subsist it or know or did not know about Jesus and the Church category

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/when-i-meet-non-catholic-on-streets-i.html

DECEMBER 17, 2016


When I meet a non Catholic on the streets I know he is on the way to Hell since the Catholic Church teaches this : this would be news for many Catholics

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/when-i-meet-non-catholic-on-street-i.html

DECEMBER 17, 2016


Unprecedented!

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/unprecedented.html


DECEMBER 15, 2016


Objective philosophical mistakes in Vatican Council II :bishops, do not respond to philosophical questions : Cardinal Pell will not answer two questions

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/there-are-objective-philosophical.html

DECEMBER 13, 2016


PHILOSOPHICAL QUESTIONS FOR A PROFESSOR OF PHILOSOPHY : ASK HIM ABOUT MISTAKES IN VATICAN COUNCIL II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/philosophical-questions-for-professor.html


DECEMBER 13, 2016


Traditionalists too unaware of major philosophical mistake : many errors in Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/traditionalists-too-unaware-of-major.html


DECEMBER 13, 2016


Too many mistakes in Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/too-many-mistakes-in-vatican-council-ii.html


DECEMBER 12, 2016


Vatican Council II riddled with philosphical error : two popes in principle support objective error in text

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/vatican-council-ii-riddled-with.html


DECEMBER 11, 2016


Priest confirms philosophical error : Lefebvre excommunication a mistake.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/priest-confirms-philosophical-error.html


DECEMBER 10, 2016


The source of the present Arian-like heresy throughout the Church is a philosophy which interprets invisible persons as being visible and so a non traditional conclusion is created

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/the-source-of-present-arian-like-heresy.html

DECEMBER 10, 2016


The present magisterium has made a major philosophical mistake

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/the-present-magisterium-has-made-major.html


DECEMBER 7, 2016


Ecclesia Dei has approved the Tridentine Rite Mass but only with the new ecclesiology in 2017 : Summorum Pontificum pilgrimage

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/pontifical-commission-ecclesia-dei-has.html


 DECEMBER 1, 2016


There is a mistake in Vatican Council II and once the error is identified and avoided, the interpretation of the Council radically changes.There is no 'spirit of Vatican Council II ' excuse anymore

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/there-is-mistake-in-vatican-council-ii.html

NOVEMBER 29, 2016


So it is only by using an irrationality that the present magisterium can re-interpret magisterial documents and say Vatican Council II indicates all Jews and Muslims in Italy do not need to convert into the Catholic Church in 2016

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/11/so-it-only-by-using-irrationality-that.html

In Ecclesia di Eucharistia the influence of the irrational premise is there : rupture with two-thousand year history

In Redemptoris Missio (1990) the ecclesiology of outside the Church there is no salvation is missing but it is there in Ecclesia di Eucharistia (2003).
The encyclical Letter of Pope John Paul II on the Eucharist unites the Catholic Church with the old ecclesiology on no salvation outside the Church.Cardinal Ratzinger in Ecclesia di Eucharistia affirms continuity with the past, though it is not said that Orthodox Christians are on the way to Hell.
Here are citations from Ecclesia di Eucharistia.1
However he still approved this Encyclical Letter with limitations.
As I mentioned in a previous blog post:
He is using an irrational premise ( visible cases of the baptism of desire without the baptism of water) to create a new and non traditional conclusion( there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) while  Vatican Council II contradicts EENS and Tradition).
He has changed the Nicene Creed, rejected the dogma EENS,re- interpreted the baptism of desire irrationally. This is a first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths of  Pope John Paul II.
It is the CDF which was in first class heresy since the time Cardinal Ratzinger took over office.inHe made an objective error which was overlooked by Pope John Paul II.Perhaps Cardinal Ratzinger's error also was an oversight.
This is a rupture with 'the Apostles','in conformity with the faith of the Apostles',' the two-thousand-year history of the People of the New Covenant'  (Ecclesia di Eucaristia 27)
'Succession to the Apostles in the pastoral mission necessarily entails the sacrament of Holy Orders, that is, the uninterrupted sequence, from the very beginning, of valid episcopal ordinations. This succession is essential for the Church to exist in a proper and full sense. (Ecclesia di Eucaristia 28).In the Sacrament of Holy Orders priests did not interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with an irrational premise.
'Nonetheless, the observations of the Council concerning the Ecclesial Communities which arose in the West from the sixteenth century onwards and are separated from the Catholic Church remain fully pertinent: “The Ecclesial Communities separated from us lack that fullness of unity with us which should flow from Baptism, and we believe that especially because of the lack of the sacrament of Orders they have not preserved the genuine and total reality of the Eucharistic mystery. Nevertheless, when they commemorate the Lord's death and resurrection in the Holy Supper, they profess that it signifies life in communion with Christ and they await his coming in glory”.(Ecclesia di Eucarestia 30).Without the irrational premise Vatican Council II would be saying that the Orthodox Christians lack Catholic faith(Ad Gentes 7) which all need for salvation.Without the irrational premise the dogmatic teaching at the Council of Florence 1441 would still be the same. It would apply to the Orthodox Christians. The Council of Florence says unless they enter the Orthodox Christians( schismatics) and heretics ( Protestants) enter the Church as members they are oriented to 'the fires of Hell'.They cannot receive the Eucharist since they are outside the Church and there is no salvation outside the Church.
-Lionel Andrades

1

22. Incorporation into Christ, which is brought about by Baptism, is constantly renewed and consolidated by sharing in the Eucharistic Sacrifice, especially by that full sharing which takes place in sacramental communion.

23...The argument is compelling: our union with Christ, which is a gift and grace for each of us, makes it possible for us, in him, to share in the unity of his body which is the Church. The Eucharist reinforces the incorporation into Christ which took place in Baptism though the gift of the Spirit (cf. 1 Cor 12:13, 27).

27... The Eucharist too has its foundation in the Apostles, not in the sense that it did not originate in Christ himself, but because it was entrusted by Jesus to the Apostles and has been handed down to us by them and by their successors. It is in continuity with the practice of the Apostles, in obedience to the Lord's command, that the Church has celebrated the Eucharist down the centuries... 
The second sense in which the Church is apostolic, as the Catechism points out, is that “with the help of the Spirit dwelling in her, the Church keeps and hands on the teaching, the 'good deposit', the salutary words she has heard from the Apostles”. Here too the Eucharist is apostolic, for it is celebrated in conformity with the faith of the Apostles. At various times in the two-thousand-year history of the People of the New Covenant, the Church's Magisterium has more precisely defined her teaching on the Eucharist, including its proper terminology, precisely in order to safeguard the apostolic faith with regard to this sublime mystery. This faith remains unchanged and it is essential for the Church that it remain unchanged.

28. Lastly, the Church is apostolic in the sense that she “continues to be taught, sanctified and guided by the Apostles until Christ's return, through their successors in pastoral office: the college of Bishops assisted by priests, in union with the Successor of Peter, the Church's supreme pastor”. Succession to the Apostles in the pastoral mission necessarily entails the sacrament of Holy Orders, that is, the uninterrupted sequence, from the very beginning, of valid episcopal ordinations. This succession is essential for the Church to exist in a proper and full sense. 

30....Nonetheless, the observations of the Council concerning the Ecclesial Communities which arose in the West from the sixteenth century onwards and are separated from the Catholic Church remain fully pertinent: “The Ecclesial Communities separated from us lack that fullness of unity with us which should flow from Baptism, and we believe that especially because of the lack of the sacrament of Orders they have not preserved the genuine and total reality of the Eucharistic mystery. Nevertheless, when they commemorate the Lord's death and resurrection in the Holy Supper, they profess that it signifies life in communion with Christ and they await his coming in glory”.

...The Catholic faithful, therefore, while respecting the religious convictions of these separated brethren, must refrain from receiving the communion distributed in their celebrations, so as not to condone an ambiguity about the nature of the Eucharist and, consequently, to fail in their duty to bear clear witness to the truth.
...The fact that the power of consecrating the Eucharist has been entrusted only to Bishops and priests does not represent any kind of belittlement of the rest of the People of God, for in the communion of the one body of Christ which is the Church this gift redounds to the benefit of all.

35. The celebration of the Eucharist, however, cannot be the starting-point for communion; it presupposes that communion already exists, a communion which it seeks to consolidate and bring to perfection. The sacrament is an expression of this bond of communion both in its invisible dimension, which, in Christ and through the working of the Holy Spirit, unites us to the Father and among ourselves, and in its visible dimension, which entails communion in the teaching of the Apostles, in the sacraments and in the Church's hierarchical order. The profound relationship between the invisible and the visible elements of ecclesial communion is constitutive of the Church as the sacrament of salvation. Only in this context can there be a legitimate celebration of the Eucharist and true participation in it. Consequently it is an intrinsic requirement of the Eucharist that it should be celebrated in communion, and specifically maintaining the various bonds of that communion intact. 

38...The Eucharist, as the supreme sacramental manifestation of communion in the Church, demands to be celebrated in a context where the outward bonds of communion are also intact. In a special way, since the Eucharist is “as it were the summit of the spiritual life and the goal of all the sacraments”, it requires that the bonds of communion in the sacraments, particularly in Baptism and in priestly Orders, be real. It is not possible to give communion to a person who is not baptized or to one who rejects the full truth of the faith regarding the Eucharistic mystery. Christ is the truth and he bears witness to the truth (cf. Jn 14:6; 18:37); the sacrament of his body and blood does not permit duplicity.
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/special_features/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_20030417_ecclesia_eucharistia_en.html

____________________________________________________



DECEMBER 26, 2016


The difference between Cardinal Ratzinger and me : one of us is in heresy

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/the-difference-between-cardinal.html



The difference between Cardinal Ratzinger and me : one of us is in heresy


The difference between Cardinal Ratzinger and me : one of us is in heresy
For me all need to enter the Catholic Church, all need to be incorporated as members, all need faith and baptism, for salvation.All non Catholics need to enter the Church and there are no exceptions.Here are the magisterial documents which support my view.
Of course they would also be supported by Pope Benedict.
Though he would also contradict these passages elsewhere.He denies them in public and in writing.
Here are the passages:
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. -Ad Gentes 7
_____________________________

14. This Sacred Council wishes to turn its attention firstly to the Catholic faithful. Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture and Tradition, it teaches that the Church, now sojourning on earth as an exile, is necessary for salvation. Christ, present to us in His Body, which is the Church, is the one Mediator and the unique way of salvation. In explicit terms He Himself affirmed the necessity of faith and baptism(124) and thereby affirmed also the necessity of the Church, for through baptism as through a door men enter the Church. -Lumen Gentium 14
________________________________

Outside the Church there is no Salvation ( the dogma)
“Outside the Church there is no salvation” (extra ecclesiam nulla salus) is a doctrine of the Catholic Faith that was taught By Jesus Christ to His Apostles, preached by the Fathers, defined by popes and councils and piously believed by the faithful in every age of the Church. Here is how the Popes defined it:
  • “There is but one universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved.” (Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, 1215.)
  • “We declare, say, define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff.” (Pope Boniface VIII, the Bull Unam Sanctam, 1302.)
  • “The most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics, can have a share in life eternal; but that they will go into the eternal fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this ecclesiastical body that only those remaining within this unity can profit by the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, their almsgivings, their other works of Christian piety and the duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved, unless he remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church.” (Pope Eugene IV, the Bull Cantate Domino, 1441.)
http://catholicism.org/category/outside-the-church-there-is-no-salvation
________________________________

 
1257 The Lord himself affirms that Baptism is necessary for salvation.He also commands his disciples to proclaim the Gospel to all nations and to baptize them... The Church does not know of any means other than Baptism that assures entry into eternal beatitude; this is why she takes care not to neglect the mission she has received from the Lord to see that all who can be baptized are "reborn of water and the Spirit."-Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995)
(Note: ' Baptism is necessary for salvation for those to whom the Gospel has been proclaimed and who have had the possibility of asking for this sacrament...but he himself is not bound by his sacraments.'-CCC1257. This is the New Theology.
This refers to the New Theology of Cardinal Ratzinger.It assumes in principle that hypothetical cases are not hypothetical.
The baptism of desire etc are exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. So he infers that there are objective cases of the baptism of water for them to be relevant and exceptiions to traditional EENS.
So refers to only those who know as opposed to those who are ignorance and are known and are saved.
Similarly we do not know any objective case of someone saved without the baptism of water since God is not bound to the Sacraments.)
____________________________________

We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.-Nicene Creed
_______________________________

Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith except every one do keep whole and undefiled; without doubt he shall perish everlastingly....This is the catholic faith; which except a man believe truly and firmly, he cannot be saved.-Athanasius Creed
________________________________
OUR PREMISES ARE DIFFERENT
Both Cardinal Ratzinger and I accept the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.For me they refer to invisible cases in real life. For Cardinal Ratzinger, since these cases are relevant and exceptions to the dogma EENS, he infers that they are visible.
So here is the difference between us.What is invisible for me is visible for him. This is our premise when doing philosophy and theology.Our premises are different of course. One is rational and the other is irrational.
Since there are visible cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, for him, there is known salvation outside the Church de jure and defacto ; as a possibility and as a known reality.
So he says all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church(CCC 846) while I say every one needs to be a member of the Church for salvation.He never states this directly in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus.His friend Fr.Karl Rahner refers to the Anonymous Christian,someone being saved in the Protestant or Orthodox Christian religion.For me there can be no known Anonymous Christian.Since de facto it is not possible for us human beings.It would be known only to God and it could be followed with Catholic faith.
In two papers of the International Theological Commission he criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney as do the Masons and the Jewish Left. Like the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, there are exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS for him.
Image result for photos of book Redemptoris Missio
Then in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus he refers to an ecclesiocentrism of the past. He means this ecclesiocentrism is not there any more. He is a liberal and interprets the baptism of desire etc as an exception.

So this is the position of Pope Benedict even today. He rejects the exclusivist ecclesiology of the past.There is a new salvation theology for him.There are exceptions to the dogma EENS as it was known in the 16th century. He said this a few months back in an interview with Avvenire. There is a development with Vatican Council II for him. Since LG 16 , LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc would refer to visible cases.So LG 16 would be a rupture with Tradition for him.
Image result for photo of amoris laetitia
So he possibly approved Amoris Laeititia which suggests there can be known exceptions to the traditional moral theology. This was being taught at pontifical universities when he was the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
NICENE CREED CHANGED
With known cases of the baptism of desire etc he has changed the Nicene Creed. The Nicene Creed instead of saying I believe in one ( known) baptism for the forgiveness of sin( which is the baptism of water) it  now means 'I believe in three or more known baptisms ( water, desire and blood) for the forgiveness of sin'. This is false. There cannot be known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church with the baptism' of desire and blood. If this happened it would only be known to God( and it would include the baptism of water since this is the dogmatic teaching).So defacto there cannot be any exceptions to the dogma EENS as it was known in the 16th century.
He is using an irrational premise ( visible cases of the baptism of desire without the baptism of water) to create a new and non traditional conclusion( there are known exceptions to the dogma EENS while  Vatican Council II contradicts EENS and Tradition).
He has changed the Nicene Creed, rejected the dogma EENS,re- interpreted the baptism of desire irrationally. This is a first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths of  Pope John Paul II.
It is the CDF which was in first class heresy since the time Cardinal Ratzinger took over office.He made an objective error which was overlooked by Pope John Paul II.Perhaps Cardinal Ratzinger's error also was an oversight.
-Lionel Andrades