Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Appello di Famiglia Domani contro il Ministro Fedeli

valeria-fedeli-1000x600





Corrispondenza Romana | Agenzia di informazione settimanale
http://www.corrispondenzaromana.it/appello-di-famiglia-domani-contro-il-ministro-fedeli/
(di Lupo Glori) A soli cinque giorni di distanza dalle dimissioni di Matteo Renzi, il 12 dicembre 2016 è nato il nuovo governo a guida dell’ex ministro degli Esteri Paolo Gentiloni, con il quale il premier battuto e ferito consuma la sua meditata “vendetta” nei confronti del popolo del Family Day, reo di avere contribuito a mandarlo a casa attraverso il suo forte e chiaro NO espresso nelle urne al voto sul referendum costituzionale dello scorso 4 dicembre.
Matteo Renzi ha perso in maniera pesante ed oltre le aspettative e la configurazione del governo Gentiloni appena varato lascia intendere che della batosta subita ne abbia fatto una questione personale.
Che l’ex premier abbia messo in atto una chiara ritorsione nei confronti dell’elettorato cattolico e, in particolare del popolo che ha riempito il Circo Massimo per dire no all’educazione gender nelle scuole italiane, risulta evidente dal fatto che l’unica poltrona che è effettivamente saltata è stata proprio quella del Ministro dell’Istruzione Stefania Giannini, per fare posto, guarda caso, al nemico numero uno del movimento guidato da Massimo Gandolfini, la senatrice ed ex vice presidente del Senato Valeria Fedeli, promotrice del DDL “Introduzione dell’educazione di genere e della prospettiva di genere nelle attività e nei materiali didattici delle scuole del sistema nazionale di istruzione e nelle università” poi confluito nella riforma della Buona Scuola.
Scorrendo l’elenco dei ministri del governo numero 64 della storia repubblicana appena insediatosi, dopo aver rapidamente sbrigato la formalità della riserva in un colloquio di un’ora con il capo dello Stato Sergio Mattarella, appare infatti palese come esso rappresenti una fotocopia esatta del dimissionario governo Renzi con una ingombrante pedina in più, rinomata per le sue posizioni fortemente ideologiche.
Il ventilato valzer di poltrone che dava per traballanti i ministeri di Marianna Madia, Beatrice Lorenzin e Giuliano Poletti, non c’è stato. Gli unici avvicendamenti obbligati ci sono stati agli Esteri, dove sulla poltrona lasciata libera dal neopremier Gentiloni si è accomodato il fido Angelino Alfano, il quale, a sua volta, lasciando sguarnita l’importante casella del “Ministero degli Interni” ha permesso la nomina del “dalemiano” Marco Minniti. La grande sconfitta del referendum costituzionale, Maria Elena Boschi ha visto forzatamente saltare il suo fallimentare “Ministero per le Riforme Costituzionali e per i Rapporti con il Parlamento”, consolandosi però con il prestigioso incarico di sottosegretario alla presidenza del Consiglio, fino a ieri occupato dal braccio destro (e sinistro) di Renzi Luca Lotti.
Quest’ultimo, pur mantenendo la delega all’editoria, assieme a quella per il Cipe, si è visto creare ed assegnare un Ministero “ad personam” che si occuperà della sua grande passione, lo Sport. In sostanza, lo ribadiamo, l’unica che ha pagato concretamente, vedendo saltare, all’apparenza inspiegabilmente, la propria poltrona è stata, Stefania Giannini ministro di una delle più citate e decantate riforme del governo Renzi, quella sul sistema dell’istruzione nota come la “Buona Scuola”.
L’enigma riguardante il fatto che l’unica testa saltata sia quella di una delle più attive e, fino a ieri, efficienti ministri del governo Renzi, si risolve facilmente constatando come il personaggio scelto per ricoprire tale importante incarico sia Valeria Fedeli, colei che in un’intervista al blog del Corriere della Sera La27ora di qualche tempo fa, così si esprimeva nei confronti del Family Day: «Va detto con chiarezza che la manifestazione è nata su una strumentalizzata e sistematica disinformazione. Sono state fatte affermazioni totalmente false, basta leggere i documenti. Con l’emendamento che prevede l’insegnamento della parità di genere in tutte le scuole di ogni ordine e grado, già approvato dalla Camera, e ora all’esame del Senato la legge di riforma della scuola si è arricchita di un principio che è un investimento fondamentale sul futuro delle nostre ragazze e dei nostri ragazzi, ispirato a quanto previsto in materia già dalle nostre leggi, dalla nostra Costituzione e dal più avanzato diritto europeo».
La neo ministra dell’Istruzione puntava il dito senza giri di parole conto l’associazionismo “omofobo” e l’obsoleta nozione di “famiglia naturale” da estirpare dalle menti dei nostri alunni, dichiarando: «Tra le sigle, poche, che hanno aderito alla manifestazione di oggi, anche alcune che si contraddistinguono affermando che, per evitare i suicidi di adolescenti vittime di persecuzioni omofobe, l’unica strada è la “conversione” all’eterosessualità. In nome dunque della “difesa dei nostri figli” e della “famiglia naturale” o “tradizionale”, si vuole contestare il diritto di ragazze e ragazzi di crescere nella consapevolezza di sé e sentendosi accolti e riconosciuti per ciò che sono».
Quindi la Fedeli concludeva rivendicando la bontà del proprio provvedimento in esame, finalizzato a porre fine alle discriminazioni e ai pregiudizi di genere: «Se questo provvedimento è contro qualcosa, questo qualcosa sono gli stereotipi, i pregiudizi, le discriminazioni, il bullismo omofobico, e nient’altro. Proprio l’educazione alla parità di genere può essere uno degli strumenti più efficaci per valorizzare le differenze, e contrastare l’omologazione dilagante, e chi vede in questo l’introduzione di una diabolica teoria gender, compie un doppio grave errore di disinformazione».
La nomina della pasionaria gender Fedeli a capo del Ministero dell’Istruzione rappresenta dunque un evidente regolamento di conti di Renzi nei confronti del popolo pro-famiglia e mette a nudo una volta per tutte la “pragmatica” visione politica del cattolico “adulto” Matteo Renzi pronto a spalancare le porte delle scuole italiane al gender in nome di una inaccettabile e squallida ripicca personale. Di fronte a tale intollerabile imposizione l’Associazione Famiglia Domani lancia un appello al popolo del Family Day e al mondo  pro-life e pro-famiglia italiano per mobilitarsi, se necessario scendendo nuovamente in piazza, al fine di chiedere le dimissioni della paladina gender posta al vertice del MIUR. Fuori il gender dalla scuola e dal sistema educativo italiano! (Lupo Glori).
Corrispondenza Romana | Agenzia di informazione settimanale
http://www.corrispondenzaromana.it/appello-di-famiglia-domani-contro-il-ministro-fedeli/

Dark Night Of The Soul, Saint John Of The Cross, Complete Audiobook, The Holy Roman Catholic Church

https://gloria.tv/video/2tQj9QU9vaf7CpDJu7orQfGn1

Dark Night Of The Soul, Saint John Of The Cross, Complete Audiobook, The Holy Roman Catholic Church

06:07:22
Sender Eduardo Quesada Badilla on Dec 11, 2016
Dark Night of the Soul is the title given to a poem by 16th-century Spanish poet and Roman Catholic mystic Saint John of the Cross. The author himself did not title the poem, on which he wrote two book-length commentaries: The Ascent of Mount Carmel (Subida del Monte Carmelo), and The Dark Night (Noche Oscura).
The term "dark night (of the soul)" is used in Roman Catholicism for a spiritual crisis in a journey towards union with God, like that described by Saint John of the Cross.
Saint Thérèse of Lisieux, a 19th-century French Carmelite, wrote of her own experience. Centering on doubts about the afterlife, she reportedly told her fellow nuns, "If you only knew what darkness I am plunged into."
While this crisis is usually temporary in nature, it may last for extended periods. The "dark night" of Saint Paul of the Cross in the 18th century lasted 45 years, from which he ultimately recovered. Mother Teresa of Calcutta, according to letters released in 2007, "may be the most extensive such case on record", lasting from 1948 almost up until her death in 1997, with only brief interludes of relief in between.[8] Franciscan Friar Father Benedict Groeschel, a friend of Mother Teresa for a large part of her life, claims that "the darkness left" towards the end of her life.
Saint John of the Cross (Spanish: San Juan de la Cruz; 1542[1] – 14 December 1591) was a major figure of the Counter-Reformation, a Spanish mystic, a Roman Catholic saint, a Carmelite friar and a priest who was born at Fontiveros, Old Castile.
John of the Cross was a reformer in the Carmelite Order of his time and the movement he helped initiate, along with Saint Teresa of Ávila, eventually led to the establishment of the Discalced Carmelites, though neither he nor Teresa were alive when the two orders separated. He is also known for his writings. Both his poetry and his studies on the growth of the soul are considered the summit of mystical Spanish literature and one of the peaks of all Spanish literature. He was canonized as a saint in 1726 by Pope Benedict XIII. He is one of the thirty-six Doctors of the Church.
The term "dark night (of the soul)" is used in Roman Catholicism for a spiritual crisis in a journey towards union with God, like that described by Saint John of the Cross.
Dark Night Of the Soul, Saint John of the Cross, Complete Audiobook, The Holy Roman Catholic Church
Saint Thérèse of Lisieux, a 19th-century French Carmelite, wrote of her own experience. Centering on doubts about the afterlife, she reportedly told her fellow nuns, "If you only knew what darkness I am plunged into."
While this crisis is usually temporary in nature, it may last for extended periods. The "dark night" of Saint Paul of the Cross in the 18th century lasted 45 years, from which he ultimately recovered. Mother Teresa of Calcutta, according to letters released in 2007, "may be the most extensive such case on record", lasting from 1948 almost up until her death in 1997, with only brief interludes of relief in between.[8] Franciscan Friar Father Benedict Groeschel, a friend of Mother Teresa for a large part of her life, claims that "the darkness left" towards the end of her life.
He was born Juan de Yepes y Álvarez[3] into a converso family (descendents of Jewish converts to Christianity) in Fontiveros, near Ávila, a town of around 2,000 people.[4][5] His father, Gonzalo, was an accountant to richer relatives who were silk merchants. However, when in 1529 he married John's mother, Catalina, who was an orphan of a lower class, Gonzalo was rejected by his family and forced to work with his wife as a weaver.[6] John's father died in 1545, while John was still only around three years old.[7] Two years later, John's older brother Luis died, probably as a result of insufficient nourishment caused by the penury to which John's family had been reduced. After this, John's mother Catalina took John and his surviving brother Francisco, and moved first in 1548 to Arévalo, and then in 1551 to Medina del Campo, where she was able to find work weaving.
In Medina, John entered a school for around 160[10] poor children, usually orphans, receiving a basic education, mainly in Christian doctrine, as well as some food, clothing and lodging. While studying there, he was chosen to serve as acolyte at a nearby monastery of Augustinian nuns.[8] Growing up, John worked at a hospital and studied the humanities at a Jesuit school from 1559 to 1563; the Society of Jesus was a new organization at the time, having been founded only a few years earlier by the Spaniard St. Ignatius of Loyola. In 1563[11] he entered the Carmelite Order, adopting the name John of St. Matthias.
Dark Night Of the Soul, Saint John of the Cross, Complete Audiobook, The Holy Roman Catholic Church.
https://gloria.tv/language/S2mQ8XjTcSwL3q8noxk8XEbJo

Saint John of the Cross

https://gloria.tv/video/DKSqHgcCG6st4YdcmffXpDWwC

Saint John of the Cross

56:02
RemySadler December 14 Saint John of the Cross Doctor of the Church (1542-1591) Saint John of the Cross was born near Avila in Spain. As a child, he was playing near a pond one day. He slid into the depths of the water, but came up unharmed and did not sink again. A tall and beautiful Lady came to offer him Her hand. No, said the child, You are too beautiful; my hand will dirty Yours. Then an elderly gentleman appeared on the shore and extended his staff to the child to bring him to shore. These two were Mary and Joseph. Another time he fell into a well, and it was expected he would be retrieved lifeless. But he was seated and waiting peacefully. A beautiful lady, he said, took me into Her cloak and sheltered me. Thus John grew up under the gaze of Mary.
One day he was praying Our Lord to make known his vocation to him, and an interior voice said to him: You will enter a religious Order, whose primitive fervor you will restore. He was twenty-one years old when he entered Carmel, and although he concealed his exceptional works, he outshone all his brethren. He dwelt in an obscure corner whose window opened upon the chapel, opposite the Most Blessed Sacrament. He wore around his waist an iron chain full of sharp points, and over it a tight vestment made of reeds joined by large knots. His disciplines were so cruel that his blood flowed in abundance. The priesthood only redoubled his desire for perfection. He thought of going to bury his existence in the Carthusian solitude, when Saint Teresa, whom God enlightened as to his merit, made him the confidant of her projects for the reform of Carmel and asked him to be her auxiliary.
John retired alone to a poor and inadequate dwelling and began a new kind of life, conformed with the primitive Rules of the Order of Carmel. Shortly afterwards two companions came to join him; the reform was founded. It was not without storms that it developed, for hell seemed to rage and labor against it, and if the people venerated John as a Saint, he had to accept, from those who should have seconded him, incredible persecutions, insults, calumnies, and even prison. When Our Lord told him He was pleased with him, and asked him what reward he wished, the humble religious replied: To suffer and to be scorned for You. His reform, though approved by the General of the Order, was rejected by the older friars, who condemned the Saint as a fugitive and an apostate and cast him into prison, from which he only escaped, after nine months' suffering, with the help of Heaven and at the risk of his life. He took refuge with the Carmelite nuns for a time, saying his experience in prison had been an extraordinary grace for him. Twice again, before his death, he was shamefully persecuted by his brethren, and publicly disgraced.
When he fell ill, he was given a choice of monasteries to which he might go; he chose the one governed by a religious whom he had once reprimanded and who could never pardon him for it. In effect, he was left untended most of the time, during his last illness. But at his death the room was filled with a marvelous light, and his unhappy Prior recognized his error, and that he had mistreated a Saint. After a first exhumation of his remains, they were found intact; many others followed, the last one in 1955. The body was at that time found to be entirely moist and flexible still.
Saint John wrote spiritual books of sublime elevation. A book printed in 1923 which has now become famous, authored by a Dominican theologian*, justly attributed to Saint John and to Saint Thomas Aquinas, whom the Carmelite Saint followed, the indisputable foundations for exact ascetic and mystical theology. He was proclaimed a Doctor of the Church in 1926 by Pope Pius XI.
Vie des Saints pour tous les jours de l'année, by Abbé L. Jaud (Mame: Tours, 1950).
https://gloria.tv/language/S2mQ8XjTcSwL3q8noxk8XEbJo

Catholic professors in Rome now tell lies : pontifical universities don't want to be quoted on a philosophical subject

Image result for Photos of teaching a lie
There are philosophical mistakes in Vatican Council II, objective mistakes.Errors in empirical observvation and professors of  philosophy do not want to answer.Instead, even after being informed, they are consciously and intentionally teaching a lie to the students. In this way they remain politically correct and there is no threat to their career.
They could simply answer the following questions (below) but they will not do so.Instead, they will continue to assume that the baptism of desire refers to a visible case in the present times. Then they will infer that there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So every one does not need to be incorporated into the Church as a member for salvation.
Image result for Photos of teaching a lie
According to Italian law telling a lie in some contexts, is criminal.
For Catholic professors, of philosophy and theology, it is not un-ethical to lie by inferring that the baptism of desire cases refer to visible  and known people. 
1.In this way Vatican Council II (LG 16, LG 14 etc) becomes a rupture with the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So they lie after being informed.
2.It also means that by mixing up what is invisible as being visible, the Holy Office 1949 and the Archbshop of Boston did not make a mistake and were not in heresy in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case.So they lie They also criticize Fr. Leonard Feeney and are poltically correct with the Left.It also means that the magisterium has not made a mistake.The LIE helps.
Image result for Photos of teaching a lie
Here are the questions that Catholic professors in Rome, and many priests too, would not like to answer and be quoted.

1.From the philosophical point of view a catechumen desires to receive the baptism of water but he dies before he can receive it and is allegedly saved.Is this a hypothetical case for you?




My answer is YES.It is a hypothetical case.
It would be hypothetical for us and known only to God.
2.
So is this case of a catechumen who is saved with the 'baptism of desire' known or unknown for you ?
He is always unknown for me. He can only be known to God if he existed.
3.
So if someone says that this case of the catechumen is physically visible in 2016 and personally known to us then this would be false reasoning.? My answer is YES.
4.
Would it violate the Principle of Non Contradiction if someone said this case was visible in the present times, and was personally known?
My answer is Yes since it is being assumed that someone invisible is visible.It is being inferred that someone who does not exist is there on earth and is known.Someone who is not concrete and tangible is assumed to be defacto and real in present time and space.
5.
Similarly this case of an un-seen and known catechumen who is saved with the desire for the baptism of water,in the past too, would be hypothetical for the people of that time, since it cannot be physically visible and known in personal cases? Yes.It cannot be known. It is always an invisible case for us human beings.

FINAL  QUESTIONS
A. Do we personally know people saved  in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc,can we see them, are they physically visible to us in 2016 ?
My answer is that we cannot see them. They are not physically visible .They are not personally known to us in our time and space.

B. Since we do not know any of these cases, in real life, they are not visible to us, there cannot be any known exception to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, nor to Ad Gentes 7 which states 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation  My answer is that they are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They were never exceptions.The Holy Office 1949 and the Archbishop of Boston made an objective error.

C.So when Vatican Council II mentions this catechumen (LG 14) and being saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16),along with orthodox passages, which support the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, was it a mistake?
It was a mistake for me. Since these are 'zero cases' in our reality, they are not 'practical exceptions' to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the old ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.I can read Vatican Council II while noting that these cases are hypothetical and theoretical only.
-Lionel Andrades

http://www.upra.org/offerta-formativa/facolta/filosofia/