Sunday, October 30, 2016

With Feeneyite Vatican Council II the Catholic Church affirms the Social Reign of Christ the King.

It was surely right, then, in view of the common teaching of the sacred books, that the Catholic Church, which is the kingdom of Christ on earth, destined to be spread among all men and all nations, should with every token of veneration salute her Author and Founder in her annual liturgy as King and Lord, and as King of Kings. And, in fact, she used these titles, giving expression with wonderful variety of language to one and the same concept, both in ancient psalmody and in the Sacramentaries.
Pope Pius XI, Encyclical Letter, QUAS PRIMAS, #11-12
http://www.catholictradition.org/Encyclicals/primas.html

Image result for Photo of the Social Reign of Christ the KingImage result for Photo of the Social Reign of Christ the King

With Feeneyite Vatican Council II the Catholic Church affirms the Social Reign of Christ the King.
Feeneyite EENS is a foundational dogma. Upon this dogma we base the traditional teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King.

Image result for Photo of the Social Reign of Christ the King
Since there is no salvation outside the Church and there is no known salvation outside the Church, all political and social legislation must be focused on Jesus as he is known in the Catholic Church.This is a priority for salvation.
Image result for Photo of the Social Reign of Christ the King
Since contrary to the new theology based on the irrational premise, there is no known salvation outside the Church, in the past or in the present.So there must not be a separation of Church and State, for the common good; the salvation of people in general.
Image result for Photo of the Social Reign of Christ the King
With Feeneyite Vatican Council II in harmony with the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS, Vatican Council II supports the necessity of the Social Reign of Christ the King.
Image result for Photo of the Social Reign of Christ the King
For Vatican Council II to be in harmony with EENS as interpreted by the 16th century missionaries, all hypothetical references must not be considered objectively seen in the present times.They are simply hypothetical.
The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to hypothetical cases.
Similarly LG 16, LG 8, NA 2, UR 3 etc are all hypothetical cases and do not refer to someone personally known in 2016.
In 1949 for Fr.Leonard Feeney there were no hypothetical cases which were exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of EENS.For the Holy Office and the Archdiocese of Boston, there were.It was here where the Church stood before a new theological road.
The Holy Office took the irrational path and Catholic ecclesiology was de-railed.
If Catholics today would  accept the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by Fr. Leonard Feeney then Vatican Council II would pastorally be in harmony with Tradition.This was observed by a Polish Catholic, on Gloria TV.He made the connection between Vatican Council II and the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.
For Fr. Leonard Feeney there were no exceptions to the dogma EENS. The baptism of desire etc were not relevant or exceptions.This is the reasoning we  need to adopt with Vatican Council II.
With the Feeneyite approach, the centuries-old approach, Vatican Council II has a continuity with the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, the Catechism of Pope Pius X,the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the rest of Tradition.All these magisterial documents are interpreted with hypothetical cases not being explicit in the present times.
This is rational. The new theology is irrational.Imagine being able to physically see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water who are physical exceptions on earth, for all needing to be incorporated as members in the Catholic Church for salvation in 2016.This is all fantasy.With this nonsense liberal theologians assumes there is known salvation outside the Church. Then they conclude that not every one needs to enter the Church.This is the Cushingite interpretation of Vatican Council II, EENS, the Catechism of Pope Pius X, the Nicene Creed etc.
With Feeneyite EENS and Feeneyite Vatican Council II we avoid the new theology.We eliminate the Cushingite innovation.
-Lionel Andrades

OCTOBER 1, 2015

OCTOBER 28, 2013


Catholics celebrate the feast of Christ the King

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/10/catholics-celebrate-feast-of-christ-king.html

There is salvation outside the Church for the Lake Garda Statement signatories.It is the same for the contemporary magisterium and the Church at large. So for example, why should the LCWR Sisters seek first the Kingdom of God and his justice within the Catholic Church ? They could also seek it in Buddhism or Hinduism.The theology is approved by the traditionalists
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/there-is-salvation-outside-church-for.html
What Social Reign of Our Lord Jesus Christ will Bishop Fellay politically affirm ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/what-social-reign-of-our-lord-jesus.html



Mons .Lorenzo Leuzzi is also promoting an irrational version of Vatican Council II contrary to the Social Reign of Christ the King
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/mons-lorenzo-leuzzi-is-also-promoting.html




USC Videos: Social Kingship of Christ in the U.S
https://youtu.be/cpoauPwY0rU



https://youtu.be/mOpn8pOb7xo

https://youtu.be/5D5uwb3LCx4
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/search/label/Separation%20of%20Church%20and%20State

http://www.onepeterfive.com/just-hearts-true-social-kingship-christ/
https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/liturgicalyear/calendar/day.cfm?date=2015-11-22

Feeneyite Vatican Council II says Lutherans are on the way to Hell.


Pope Francis greets leaders of the Lutheran World Federation during a visit to the Vatican in October 2013 - AFP

Feeneyite Vatican Council II says Lutherans are on the way to Hell.Vatican Council II interpreted with the reasoning of Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston or the 16th century missionaries takes us back to the old ecumenism.It is a different Vatican Council II then the one Pope Francis understands.
Vatican Council II interpreted with Feeneyism would not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and so the Council II would be saying all Lutherans are on the way to Hell.There are no known exceptions in the present times and the Council cannot be mentioning any exception.
In other words all Lutherans are on the way to Hell without Catholic Faith.However over the last 50 years Vatican Council II is being interpreted with Cushingism.
Luther did not have Catholic Faith when he died. He also died in mortal sin for so many other reasons. He was oriented to the fires of Hell according to Catholic teaching.Catholics who marry Lutherans are living in adultery even if the Cushingite priest says otherwise.

LUTHERANS CANNOT RECEIVE THE EUCHARIST
It is being reported these days, correctly, that Lutherans cannot receive the Eucharist, as the one-world-religion people would want them to do so. However it is not being said that outside the Church there is no known salvation.We do not and cannot know of a Lutheran who is in Heaven without 'faith and baptism' in the Catholic Church.There is no known exception on Oct 30, 2016 to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Those who are saved in imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3), are unknown people in 2016.Imaginary cases. If there was such case in the past, it could not be a known exception to EENS in 2016.Then for us human beings some one in the past cannot be postulated as an exception to the dogma EENS in the present (October 2016).

COUNCIL MINED WITH  HYPOTHETICAL CASES
Vatican Council II is full of these hypothetical cases.They have been placed there, for liberals to interpret them as being objectively known in the present times.Even the conservatives have fallen before this error in reasoning. 
Vatican Council II with Feeneyism as an interpretative theology is saying all Lutherans need to be incorporated into the Catholic Church to avoid the fires of Hell and this is a message which Pope Francis and the leftist Vatican Curia will not convey to the Lutherans.

CATHOLIC BLOGGERS WITHOUT FEENEYISM
Even Catholic bloggers are not covering this point. Since they too do not interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.Instead for them to it is interpreting Vatican Council II with the innovative and irrational Cushingite new theology.Then they reject the Council and wrongly blame the text of Vatican Council II for their fault.
Without Cushingism, that is assuming there are known exceptions to the dogma EENS, even though there are physically none visible in 2016, Vatican Council II is traditional with the old ecclesiology.The old ecclesiology said Jews, Protestants and Orthodox Christians needed to convert into the Church to avoid the fires of Hell.

So If we go back to the interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney then pastorally Vatican Council II will have the hermeneutic of continuity on ecumenism.

Leonard Feeney is the key to solving all this confusion brought into the Church.

POLISH CATHOLIC ON GLORIA TV
I repeat, if Catholics today would  accept the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by Fr. Leonard Feeney then Vatican Council II would pastorally be in harmony with Tradition.This was observed by a Polish Catholic, on Gloria TV.
Instead the two popes will not interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.So the Council is a break with Tradition and the traditional ecumenism of return.

HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY WITH ECUMENISM OF RETURN
Vatican Council II has a continuity with the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the rest of Tradition.This means Luther was outside the Catholic Church and is lost according to teachings of the Catholic Church in Vatican Council II.

MISSING LINK FOUND IN CATHOLIC CHURCH 
Feeneyism is the missing link in the Catholic bloggers interpretation of  the Pope's visit to Lund tomorrow for the 500th anniversary of the Protestant Revolt, where he does not tell Lutherans that they are on the way to Hell and need to enter the Catholic Church.

JESUIT NEW THEOLOGY ELIMINATED
With Feeneyism the new theology promoted by the Jesuits has been eliminated.The new theology was pegged on there being known salvation outside the Church.
With Feeneyism we have a rational way to interpret Vatican Council II and tell Lutherans and other Christians that it is not enough to just believe in Jesus but one has to follow the teachings of Jesus as taught in only the Catholic Church.

NO CITATIONS FOR LIBERALS
With Feeneyism as an alternative interpretation of the Council the liberals, in and out of the Catholic Church, have no citations in Vatican Council II to support their familiar non traditional interpretation on ecumenism.
-Lionel Andrades

SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2016


Feeneyism is the missing linkhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/feeneyism-is-missing-link.html


http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2016/06/01/pope_to_take_part_in_reformation_events_in_lund_and_malm%C3%B6/1234020