Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Asia Bibi : Pakistani Christian’s Final Appeal in Death Sentence

News: World News              

by Aaron Maxwell  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  October 10, 2016                                  

MULTAN, Pakistan (ChurchMilitant.com) - The Supreme Court of Pakistan will hear the case of Asia Bibi, a Christian woman sentenced to death for supposedly blaspheming Mohammed. The final appeal will take place next week.
Bibi, whose full name is Aasiya Noreen, has been in prison since 2009. She was convicted of blaspheming Mohammed in 2010, and the Pakistani appeal courts in 2014 affirmed the charges against her and upheld her death sentence. The following year, the Pakistani Supreme Court decided to hear the case, announcing over the weekend the court hearing would take place Thursday, October 13.
It started when Bibi was having a drink of water in 2009, and the Muslim women she was working with accused her of contaminating the water and refused to drink from the same bowl as Bibi because she was a Christian and therefore "unclean." This erupted an argument between the women, where they demanded that Bibi convert to Islam. She refused and affirmed her Catholic faith, saying, "I believe in my religion and in Jesus Christ, who died on the Cross for the sins of mankind. What did your Prophet Muhammad ever do to save mankind?"
 Ashiq Masih, Bibi's husband, said that after making that comment, "Suddenly she saw men and women walking towards her with angry gestures. … They started beating her and shouting that she had made derogatory remarks against the Prophet Muhammad." She was dragged to the police station, where she was thrown in jail for for the crime of blasphemy.
The Pakistani population is at least 95 percent Muslim and the country's official religion is Islam. The U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom has reported that Pakistan has "one of the worst situations in the world for religious freedom."
Even while in prison, Muslims have been threatening Bibi's life. She was put in solitary confinement in 2015 in order to protect her. It is reported that one Muslim cleric put a bounty of 500,000 rupees on Bibi's head for anyone able to kill her.
Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW) reports that the Bibi's case only has a chance in the Supreme Court, where it is not as intimidated or influenced by the Muslim mobs.
One of CSW's sources said,
We've seen how politicians who have spoken up have been attacked. Salman Taseer and Shahbaz Bhatti, both killed in 2011, were directly involved in speaking out against the arrest and conviction of Asia Bibi. We have also seen and heard of cases where judges who are presiding over cases involving the blasphemy laws have received threats to their lives and have had to flee the country. So as much as the Pakistani Supreme Court would take a very objective approach, history has taught us that even judges at that level are open to discrimination and threats to their life.
In the last couple of years people have called on the government to change the blasphemy laws, giveing some hope that Bibi's charges could be dismissed. 
"We call on the government of Pakistan to abolish the blasphemy laws and seek to create a society where every Pakistani citizen is free to exercise their faith and live in peace with their neighbors," Release International's chief executive Paul Robinson said.
The Center for Research and Security Studies in Pakistan reports that at least 62 people have been sentenced to death for blaspheming against Mohammad since 1990, and more than 40 people are currently facing the death sentence.

Catholic Street Evangelisation


Saint Paul’s Street Evangelization

Rain or shine, Catholics go out into the streets to spread the good news

Ora sappiamo che i papi, il cardinale Ratzinger e Mons.Lefebvre trascurato un errore oggettiva nell'interpretazione del Concilio Vaticano II:Può essere cambiato oggi.

4 1 447

"Un albero si giudica dai frutti. Le conseguenze del Concilio Vaticano II" di Alessandro Fiore


Relazione tenuta da Alessandro Fiore, sul tema "Un albero si giudica dai frutti. Le conseguenze del Concilio Vaticano II”, durante il 20° Convegno di Studi Cattolici svoltosi a Rimini il 19-20-21 ottobre 2012 ed organizzato dalla Fraternità … [Espandi]

Ora sappiamo che i papi, il cardinale Ratzinger e Mons.Lefebvre trascurato un errore oggettiva nell'interpretazione del Concilio Vaticano II.Senza questo errore Concilio Vaticano II sostiene il Catechismo di Pio X, il Sillabo e il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus secondo il 16 ° secolo missionaries.
Concilio Vaticano II sarebbe afferma un ecumenismo di ritorno e la necessità per tutti di avere la 'fede e il battesimo'(AG 7) per la salvezza nel 2016 senza conosciuto eccezioni.
Quindi potremmo dire che i frutti cattivi che vediamo è a causa della cattiva interpretazione.
Può essere cambiato oggi.
-Lionel Andrades

Concilio Vaticano II e il Catechismo di Pio X sono Feeneyite.Contraddicono Papa Pio XII, l'arcivescovo di Boston e i Jesuiti Americane..Confusione si pone con 29Q che può essere interpretata come visibile o invisibile

Concilio Vaticano II e il Catechismo di Pio X sono Feeneyito.Contraddicono Papa Pio XII, l'arcivescovo di Boston e gli Jesuiti Americane.Confusion si pone con 29Q che può essere interpretata come visibile o invisibile

Concilio Vaticano II e il Catechismo di Pio X sono  supporto Don Leonard Feeney di Boston.Contraddice Papa Pio XII, l'arcivescovo di Boston ei gesuiti residenti negli Stati Uniti. I numeri 24Q e 27Q nel Catechismo sono Feeneyite.Confusion esi pone con 29Q che può essere interpretata come visibile o invisibile.

Il Concilio Vaticano II (AG 7, LG 14) e il Catechismo di Pio X sono Feeneyite per me. Si dice che tutti hanno bisogno di essere incorporati nella Chiesa cattolica come membri per la salvezza.
Non dicono che che salvezza al di fuori della Church.Non dire che il battesimo di desiderio e di essere salvato nell'ignoranza invincibile sono explicito.Neanche dire che ignoranza invincibile e il catecumeno che desidera il battesimo di acqua si riferiscono a casi non-ipotetici, casi reale nel 2016.Non fare questa false inferenza direttamente.Invece uno bisogna sceglie questa inferenza.Non e scritta in testo.Puo dedurre che ci sono riferimenti a casi visibili per noi nel 2016 che ricevuti salvezza nell'ignoranza invincibile senza il battesimo di acqua.
Così il Concilio Vaticano II e il Catechismo di Pio X supportano P. Leonard Feeney di Boston e contradirre Pio XII e l'arcivescovo di Boston.Contradice loro  solo quando i casi ipotetici sono considerati de fatto e noto ojjetivamente; casi invisibili sono assunti essere visibile e che è accettato di principio (de jure) assumere conosciuto de facto (in realtà).
 Nel Catechismo di Pio X vedere i numeri 24Q e 27Q chi e pro-Fr.Leonard Feeney.1
Confusione oggi viene fornito con 29Q.2
Loro può essere interpretato come visibile o invisible.Se 29Q si riferisce ai casi visibili nel 2016, le persone personalmente noto che sono salvati nell'ignoranza invincibile e senza il battesimo di acqua nella Chiesa cattolica, poi 29Q contraddice 24Q e 27Q. Come ho già detto in un precedente post sul blog, Io chiamo questo l'interpretazione  del Catechismo di Papa Pio X,Cushingismo.
Per i Cushingiti ci sono noti eccezioni all'interpretazione Feeneyite di extra elesiam nulla salus (EENS).Questo era la interpretazione tradizionale.Il dogma EENS non è più come lo era per i 16 ° secolo missionari. Si tratta di una rottura con San Roberto Bellamine, San Francesco d'Assisi e San Francesco Xavier.Ha l'ermeneutica della rottura anche con i tre Concili della Chiesa che ha definito questo dogma ex cathedra.
Per me 29Q si riferisce ad un invisibile case.So non è un'eccezione a 24Q e 27Q.So il Catechismo di Pio X è Feeneyite per me.Non e Cushingite per me.

Tutti hanno bisogno di essere membri della Chiesa cattolica per evitare i fuochi dell inferno.No può essere salvato fuori della Chiesa.

E con questo ragionamento razionale che io interpreto il Concilio Vaticano II come non essere una rottura con il Catechismo di Papa Pio X. Non contraddice il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus come era conosciuto ai missionari 16 ° secolo.

Il Concilio Vaticano II e il Catechismo di Pio X, inoltre, non contraddicono il Sillabo e il resto della Tradizione.

Per i tradizionalisti e la Curia Vaticana, il Concilio Vaticano II è una rottura con Tradizione.Lumen Gentium 16 (ignoranza invincibile) si riferisce ad un errore.Con la false inferenza  emerge visible.
Per me la Chiesa Cattolica insegna, prima e dopo il Concilio Vaticano II, che tutti gli indù, buddisti, ebrei, musulmani, cristiani ortodossi, protestanti, atei e altri non cattolici, hanno bisogno di essere incorporati nella Chiesa come membri di salvation.-Lionel Andrades

 24 Q. To be saved, is it enough to be any sort of member of the Catholic Church?
A. No, to be saved it is not enough to be any sort of member of the Catholic Church; it is necessary to be a living member. 
27 Q. Can one be saved outside the Catholic, Apostolic and Roman Church?
A. No, no one can be saved outside the Catholic, Apostolic Roman Church, just as no one could be saved from the flood outside the Ark of Noah, which was a figure of the Church
 29 Q. But if a man through no fault of his own is outside the Church, can he be saved?
 A. If he is outside the Church through no fault of his, that is, if he is in good faith, and if he has received Baptism, or at least has the implicit desire of Baptism; and if, moreover, he sincerely seeks the truth and does God's will as best he can such a man is indeed separated from the body of the Church, but is united to the soul of the Church and consequently is on the way of salvation


October 9, 2016

The Catechism of Pope Pius X is Feeneyite.It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston and contradicts Pope Pius XII and the Archbishop of Boston. See numbers 24Q and 27Q.Confusion today comes with 29Q. It can be interpreted as being visible or invisible.



Vatican Council II and the Catechism of Pope Pius X are Feeneyite.They contradict Pope Pius XII,the Archbishop of Boston and the U.S Jesuits.Confusion arises with 29Q which can be interpreted as being visible or invisible http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/vatican-council-ii-and-catechism-of.html

Gloria.TV News on the 11th of October 2016 : Only Party Follower Cardinals

 1 325

Gloria.TV News on the 11th of October 2016

Nice Guy: On Sunday Pope Francis announced the creation of 17 new cardinals. One of them is Archbishop Carlos Aguiar Retes of Tlalnepantla, Mexico, who studied together with Gloria.tv’s Fr Reto Nay in Rome. He is a nice guy, wrote a mediocre doctorate on Biblical theology, dressed up as a priest only exceptionally, and will go along with whatever ideological party is running the Vatican.

Amoris Laetitia a Grace?Archbishop Sérgio da Rocha of Brasilia, will also be made a cardinal in November. In April he called Pope Francis’ controversial document Amoris Laetitia a – quote – “grace of the Year of Mercy.” Da Rocha is a former Professor of Moral Theology.

A Fighter Against the Mass:Among the new cardinals is the 80-year-old Monsignor Renato Corti, the former bishop of Novara, Italy. He made headlines in 2007 when he suspended three priests who wanted to celebrate the Latin Mass. They were supported by 600 people. Corti was Vicar General and Auxiliary Bishop of radical Milan Cardinal Martini.

Only Party Followers: Notable eligible prelates, which Pope Francis will omit at the upcoming consistory, include Los Angeles Archbishop José Gomez and Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput. Francis prefers ultra-liberal prelates who have been publicly and clearly supportive of his heterodox interpretation of Amoris Laetitia.


Cardinal Raymond Burke : politically correct on Islam

Cdl. Burke Doubles Down on Danger of IslamCardinal Raymond Burke gave an  interview on Islam to a leftist newspaper in Italy.He presented the Church as the political Left and the two popes understand it.He did not affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation, nor the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the 16th century missionaries.

He did not cite Vatican Council II as having the hermenutic of continuity  with the Catechism of Pope Pius X.He interprets the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995) with Cushingite theology.It is based on an irrational premise and conclusion.So it would mean all Muslims do not need to convert into the Catholic Church in 2016 for salvation.
He presented Jesus without the necessity of the Catholic Church and so rejected an excumenism of return.
In the interview he was a politically correct liberal.He offers the Traditional Latin Mass without the old ecclesiology and has replaced it  with the Ratzinger-Rahner new theology.
He approves of the Eucharist being given to those who have changed salvation theology, with philsophical salvation.However he does not approve moral theology being changed with philosophical subjectivism, as in the case of Amoris Laetitia.

He approves the Eucharist being given to Catholics who interpret the Nicene Creed as saying, 'I believe in not one known baptism, the baptism of water, but in more than one baptism without the baptism of water. They are the personally known baptisms of desire, blood, invincible ignorance, seeds of the Word, good and holy things in other relgions, imperfect communion with the church....

Pope Francis holds a baby during a visit to the neonatology division of the San Giovanni hospital in Rome, Friday, Sept. 16, 2016.
He  did not comment when Pope Francis visited a hosptial in Rome recently where abortions are recommended.The pope did not say a word against the abortions being done there and neither did Cardinal Burke.
There are lay Catholics who pray outside that hospital in Rome and no religious joins them.
'Do Christians and Muslims worship the same God ?', Cardinal Burke he was asked.
Vatican Council II refers to the Creator.The Creator is one.The understanding and worship of God among religions is different.

The  Mohammadanand Catholic religion teaches exclusive salvation.However for Cardinal Raymond Burke there is no exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.This is approved by the liberals, non Catholics and Catholics.He interprets Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents assuming imaginary cases are objectively visible in 2016.So they are exceptions to the old ecclesiology of the Catholic Church which was  based on exclusive salvation.He rejects the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS and remains a cardinal in good standing with Pope Francis.
On the Feast of Our Lady of the Rosary lighting struck the Vatican for the second time.The day was a reminder when Muslims attempted to take over Italy through war.In future when there are religious wars,and the persecution of Christians in Europe,as Our Lady and the saints have reminded us, there will be doctrinal confusion for Cardinal Burke and many Catholics.This confusion was not there at the time of the Battle of Lepanto.
Presently only Bishop Richard Williamson seems to be speaking clearly about Islam and even he too is misinterpreting Vatican Council II,as a break with the teachings of the popes and saints on salvation and other religions.
They need to cite Vatican Council II, along with the popes and saints,and tell Muslims and other non Catholics, that they will all being going to Hell with no known exceptions.
-Lionel Andrades

October 8, 2016
Cardinal Raymond Burke does not realize that the Catholic identity has been compromised with his belief in there being known salvation outside the Church http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/cardinal-raymond-burke-does-not-realize.html