Sunday, September 11, 2016

Yes the Conciliar Church is modernist and would be preparing many to accept a New World Religion,but there is a choice.Choose a rational, traditional theology and discover the fault is not there in Vatican Council II itself


David Dees Art (CLICK THE PIC!)

TradCatKnight: Against the New World Order But Not Vatican II?
By: Eric Gajewski
I try to keep things simple here at TradCatKnight. I know these times are filled with confusion and thus we all must highly sympathetic to some degree for those who cannot quite grasp this apostasy. However, one of the more absurd arguments coming from those in the Conciliar Church, that is, those, still clinging to the Second Vatican Council, is this notion of fighting against the New World Order wilst still following the Council. It is a grave delusion to think that what has transpired at the Council and since the Council in no ways is interrelated with the New World Order talked about “in the world”. St. Anthony the Great warned of Vatican II wherein churchmen would finally succumb and join hands with the world. Thus, how do the Conciliarist miss this building of the new City of Man under the guise of freedom and human dignity? How do they miss that the Vatican II Popes when speaking on the New World Order in no way indicate that it is based upon the Social Kingship of Christ? It is another one of those “lets sweep it under the rug” situation. Or even worse, the Concilairist will cling to “he is not talking about THAT New World Order". Pure delusion.

https://gloria.tv/article/koKbvm3qec4SMebMGVJ2cFCjC

Eric Gajewski opposes Feeneyism  so Vatican Council II and the Conciliar Church for him would be a rupture with the past and contributing to the New World Order, the One World Religion.
If he chose Feeneyism as a theology he would assume that the baptism of desire (BOD) and blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), without the baptism of water,refer to imaginary cases, hypothetical possibilities  and they are not seen in 2016.
This is reality.They are not seen.
With  extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite) accepted by him, it would be possible to affirm the old ecclesiology. So ecumenism  would be one of return and non Christians would also need to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.Since outside the Church there would be no salvation, outside the Church there would be no known salvation.
At present Eric Gajewski has a problem with Vatican Council II since he is not a Feeneyite but a Cushngite.For him BOD,BOB and I.I refer to visible cases  in the present times, They are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite).
So Vatican Council II contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) and the Syllabus of Errors.It is modernist.
Yes the Conciliar Church is modernist and would be preparing many to accept a New World Religion,but he has a choice. He can choose a rational and traditional theology and discover then that the fault is not there in Vatican Council II(Feeneyite)
-Lionel Andrades
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.it/

Cardinal Muller, Archbishop Di Noia and Bishop Fellay's theology is based on invisible cases being visible, what is not seen as being seen



Cardinal Muller, Archbishop Di Noia and Bishop Fellay's theology is based on hypothetical cases being explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/cardinal-muller-archbishop-di-noia-and.html

CARDINAL GERHARD MULLER, ARCHBISHOP AUGUSTINE DI NOIA, BISHOP BERNARD FELLAY MISTAKE HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCES AS BEING EXPLICIT IN THE PRESENT TIMES http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/cardinal-gerhard-muller-archbishop.html

Apologists Mons. Clifford Fenton, Fr.William Most and Fr. John Hardon considered implicit cases as being explicit: traditionalists agree any one who does this is wrong http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/apologists-mons-clifford-fenton.html




CARDINAL GERHARD MULLER : MISTAKES HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCES AS BEING EXPLICIT IN THE PRESENT TIMES.
Related image

That has been discussed, but here, too, there has been a development of all that was said in the Church, beginning with St. Cyprian, one of the Fathers of the Church, in the third century. Again, the perspective is different between then and now. In the third century, some Christian groups wanted to be outside the Church, and what St. Cyprian said is that without the Church a Christian cannot be savedThe Second Vatican Council also said this: Lumen Gentium 14 says: “Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.” He who is aware of the presence of Revelation is obliged by his conscience to belong publicly — and not only in his conscience, in his heart — to this Catholic Church by remaining in communion with the Pope and those bishops in communion with him.
But we cannot say that those who are inculpably ignorant of this truth are necessarily condemned for that reason. We must hope that those who do not belong to the Church through no fault of their own, but who follow the dictates of their God-given conscience, will be saved by Jesus Christ whom they do not yet know. Every person has the right to act according to his or her own conscience. - Cardinal Gerhard Muller (10/02/2012 ). Archbishop Gerhard Müller: 'The Church Is Not a Fortress', National Catholic Register  http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/archbishop-mueller-the-church-is-not-a-fortress/#ixzz3pwkg3Mur

ARCHBISHOP AUGUSTINE DO NOIA : ASSUMES WHAT IS KNOWN ONLY TO GOD CAN BE KNOWN AND JUDGED BY US HUMAN BEINGS.


I don’t know if you can blame this on the Council so much as the emergence of a theological trend that emphasized the possibility of salvation of non-Christians. But the Church has always affirmed this, and it has never denied it. …The Council did say there are elements of grace in other religions, and I don’t think that should be retracted. I’ve seen them, I know them — I’ve met Lutherans and Anglicans who are saints.' - Archbishop Augustine di Noia ( 07/01/2012 ), Archbishop Di Noia, Ecclesia Dei and the Society of St. Pius X, National Catholic Register.


http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/archbishop-dinoia-ecclesia-dei-and-the-society-of-st.-pius-x/#ixzz3Q1Vx3byR


___________________________

 BISHOP BERNARD FELLAY  ASSUMES THEORETICAL POSSIBILITIES KNOWN ONLY TO GOD ARE EXPLICIT IN THE PRESENT TIMES AND RELEVANT TO EENS

LAB_82 
The same declaration (LG, 8) also recognizes the presence of “salvific elements” in non-Catholic Christian communities. The decree on ecumenism goes even further, adding that “the Spirit of Christ does not refrain from using these churches and communities as means of salvation, which derive their efficacy from the fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Catholic Church.” (UR, 3)
Such statements are irreconcilable with the dogma “No salvation outside of the Church, which was reaffirmed by a Letter of the Holy Office on August 8, 1949". -Bishop Bernard Fellay  (April 13, 2014 ) Letter to Friends and Benefactors no. 82
http://www.dici.org/en/documents/letter-to-friends-and-benefactors-no-82/

________________________________________________________












-Lionel Andrades


Ven del Libano








I Saw Heaven - 6 Stories Of People who Saw Heaven - Amazing Revelation