...it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member...-Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.
Ecclesia Dei has accepted the error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.It is with this error that they interpret Vatican Council II.
For them there are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeenyite) in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and also in Vatican Council II ( LG 16, LG 14 etc).
They are interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism.
While I interpret the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( first part is Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.
For Ecclesia Dei there are visible, seen in the flesh exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite). So they accept a new doctrine.It is an extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Cushingite).
I still affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite).
Ecclesia Dei must be asked to acknowledge the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. Then they must be asked to interpret Vatican Council II not with Cushingism but with Feeneyism. This is rational,traditional and with the hermeneutic of continuity.
This is important for the doctrinal reconciliation of the SSPX.It is also important that all religious communities and all bishops and cardinals interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism. In this way the Vatican will have come back to the Faith.It will have returned to the original doctrines and theology of the Catholic Church.
The SSPX will then not have to fear liberal bishops once they have received full canonical status.-Lionel Andrades