Saturday, September 3, 2016

Is Fr. Brian Harrison intentionally telling a lie to protect his career ?


Offering the New Mass — in Latin

Approval was given by the archdiocese of St. Louis early in 2008 for St. Mary of Victories to use these traditional practices at one of its two Sunday Masses. This is very much in line with Benedict XVI's well-known call for a "hermeneutic of continuity" with respect to Vatican II. This meant that he, like all other post-Vatican II popes, insisted that the Council's teachings and directives are to be understood, explained and implemented in a way that shows forth their harmony and unity with the Church's great bi-millennial heritage of doctrine and worship.- By Fr. Brian Harrison, O.S. -A beautiful blend of old and new at St. Mary of Victories Church in St. Louis, Missouri
http://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/celebrating-the-new-mass-in-latin


I mentioned in the last post that :
1.Some things are seen or unseen.Some would point out that all things are either seen or not seen.
2.The baptism of desire is not seen. It is invisible.
3.Lumen Gentium 16 is being interpreted as being visible or invisible, seen or not seen.1
For Fr.Brian Harrison and the Oblates of Wisdom community, there are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).


 He refuses to say that the baptism of desire is not visible in 2016 and so is not an exception to the dogma EENS. If he did say this he is afraid to be accused of being a Feeneyite.He will then be persecuted.
So the Latin Mass which he refers to above really has the hermeneutic of rupture with the 'bi-millennial heritage of doctrine'.
He interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism so how can Vatican Council II's ' teachings and directives', ' be understood, explained and implemented in a way that shows forth their harmony and unity with the Church's great bi-millennial heritage of doctrine 'This is only possible with Feeneyism as a theology.
So this Latin Mass with the  new ecclesiology cannot be  in harmony with the Church's great ni-millennial heritage.'

POPE BENEDICT'S THEOLOGY CREATES THE RUPTURE
Pope Benedict realizes this. A few months back he said that extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Cushingism) is no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries.There was a rupture.The rupture has come from interpreting Vatican Council II with the New Theology; with Cushingism i.e all hypothetical references are assumed to refer to explicit cases in 2016.
It is a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite), Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite), Vatican Council II (interpreted with Feeneyism), the Letter of the Holy Office 1949( the first part is Feeneyite), the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite) etc.

I mentioned in the last blog post that :
4.The FSSP choose to interpret LG 16 as being visible.Someone in invincible ignorance saved without the baptism of water in 2016 is seen.
5.They can now choose to interpret LG 16 as being invisible.So also with LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc.These are references to persons not seen.
6.So this is Feeneyism. They choose Feeneyism instead of Cushingism as a theology. They choose to see through Feeneyite lens.
This is what Fr. Brian Harrison needs to do. He need to view Vatican Council II ( LG 16 etc ) with the theology of Feeneyism.
But how can he do so?
He will not be allowed to offer Holy Mass by the diocese.


Michael Voris and the staff at Church Militant TV also know that if they intepret magisterial documents with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism they will be persecuted by the Left.So they are politically correct with the Church of Nice.
O.K. So they do not want to be persecuted but they should not project this Latin Mass as a continuation with the theology and doctrines of the past.

I mentioned in the last post:
7.Since this is rational, traditional,non innovative and non heretical they would expect all Catholics, including the popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, to do the same.

Can they offer Holy Mass in Latin or English at the St. Mary of Victories Church in St. Louis, Missouri with Feeneyism? No!

Father Brian Harrison is the chaplain of St. Mary of Victories parish in St. Louis, Missouri since he does not affirm EENS ( Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).He is a liberal, a modernist.
He has to use a falsehood to interpret the Council.Something which is invisible for us he has to pretend is visible.Something which cannot be seen he pretends must be seen.


Canonically it should be asked in the diocese how can St. Mary of Victories Church in St. Louis Missouri suggest things which are unseen are seen and then use this premise to interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Is the priest intentionally telling a lie to protect his career and status ?
As a priest who does interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism, as I do, he may not be granted incardination. So he is forced to tell a lie and pretend that the Mass in his church is a continuation with traditional doctrine.
Fr.Brian Harrison for example will not say that according to Vatican Council II ( AG 7, LG 14) all Jews and Muslims need to formally enter the Catholic Church  with 'faith and baptism' for salvation from Hell.
He will not say that according to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) all non Catholics are oriented to the fires of Hell.
He will not say that since Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) the bi-millenium interpretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation has not been changed.Instead it has been changed for his community the Oblates of Wisdom.They are Cushingites and consider this 'wisdom'.
Since there is no known salvation outside the Church for us the Social Kingship of Christ the King over all political legislation is a priority.
There cannot be a separation of Church and State. This is an understanding based on Vatican Council II.However this is not the catechesis done by his religious community.
They have the liturgical rites and vestments of the Tridentine Latin Mass but their theology and doctrines are based on an irrationality which results in heresy.It has the approval of the USCCB and the Vatican.-Lionel Andrades

1.
SEPTEMBER 3, 2016

FSSP priests need to change direction : mission, salvation, Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/09/fssp-priests-need-to-change-direction.html

FSSP priests need to change direction : mission, salvation, Vatican Council II

936full-virgen-de-guadalupeAll the priests in the FSSP can agree :-
1.Some things are seen or unseen.Some would point out that all things are either seen or not seen.
2.The baptism of desire is not seen. It is invisible.
3.Lumen Gentium 16 is being interpreted as being visible or invisible, seen or not seen.
4.The FSSP choose to interpret LG 16 as being visible.Someone in invincible ignorance saved without the baptism of water in 2016 is seen.
5.They can now choose to interpret LG 16 as being invisible.So also with LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc.These are references to persons not seen.
6.So this is Feeneyism. They choose Feeneyism instead of Cushingism as a theology. They choose to see through Feeneyite lens.
7.Since this is rational, traditional,non innovative and non heretical they would expect all Catholics, including the popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, to do the same.
Agreement in public on these points would help the SSPX reconciliation and the Vatican's return to the Faith.Since the doctrinal scenario would have changed.With Feeneyism, Vatican Council II would no more be an issue.The Council is traditional on EENS( Feeneyite).
EENS( Feeneyite) was the basis over the centuries for an ecumenism of return, non Christians needing to formally convert and the need for the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation,with the non separation of Church and State.
Parishioners at FSSP parishes could in public, also affirm these points.
-Lionel Andrades
(First Saturday)
 
 
 

Cardinal Burke, Cardinal Sarah and the FSSP priests offer Holy Mass ad orientem and assume LG 16 refers to visible cases in 2016. This is irrational. It's inference and conclusion is non traditional.It creates the hermeneutic of rupture with the past http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/09/cardinal-burke-cardinal-sarah-and-fssp.html