Monday, August 8, 2016

Solo la fede non ci porta in Paradiso. Anche bisogma opera - Don Leonardo Maria Pompei

I campioni della fede

I campioni della fede


Il capitolo undicesimo della lettera agli Ebrei: le due dimensioni costitutive (intellettuale ed esistenziale) della fede. I "campioni della fede" di questo capitolo, in particolare il "fuoriclasse" Abramo, nostro "padre nella fede". Omelia Domenica 7 Agosto 2016, santa Messa ore 18:30, XIX Domenica del tempo ordinario, anno C


https://gloria.tv/video/sGeVCeCDoFHbHyxZGy5NXd4rZ

Se la fede sia assolutamente necessaria per la salvezza

Gloria TV

Se la fede sia assolutamente necessaria per la salvezza


La Sacra Scrittura dice in maniera molto chiara che senza la fede non ci si può salvare e non si può piacere a Dio.
Gesù dice: “chi crede in lui non è condannato; ma chi non crede è già stato condannato” (Gv3,18; cfr. 3,36).
E “Chi crederà e sarà battezzato sarà salvato, ma chi non crederà sarà condannato” (Mc 16,16).
Ugualmente la lettera agli Ebrei dice: “Senza la fede è impossibile essere graditi a Dio. Chi infatti si accosta a Dio deve credere che egli esiste e che egli ricompensa coloro che lo cercano” (Eb 11,6).
San Paolo ne porta il motivo più o meno con queste parole: come si può orientare la propria vita a Dio se non lo si conosce?
Ecco le parole precise dell’Apostolo: “Come potranno invocarlo senza aver prima creduto in lui?” (Rm 10,14).
Da queste affermazioni la Chiesa ha dedotto l’assoluta necessità della fede in ordine alla salvezza.
Il Concilio Vaticano I afferma: “Poiché infatti senza la fede è impossibile piacere a Dio e giungere al consorzio dei suoi figli, nessuno può essere giustificato senza la fede, né può conseguire la vita eterna se in essa non persevera sino alla fine (Mt 10,22)” (DS 3012).
Anche il Vaticano II in molti passi parla dell’assoluta necessità della fede per la salvezza, come ad esempio: “Perciò non possono salvarsi quegli uomini, i quali, pur non ignorando che la Chiesa cattolica è stata fondata da Dio per mezzo di Gesù Cristo come necessaria, non vorranno entrare in essa o in essa perseverare” (Lumen gentium 14).
La motivazione teologica di questa necessità si fonda sul modo specificamente umano di vivere e di operare. Infatti una volta che l’uomo ha raggiunto l’uso di ragione e incomincia a vivere in modo responsabile, cosciente e libero, gli è indispensabile conoscere il significato vero della sua vita, il fine cui ordinare i suoi atti.
Ora il fine ultimo cui di fatto è stato ordinato da Dio non è solo quello proporzionato alla sua natura e alle sue capacità, fine che egli potrebbe conoscere e perseguire da solo, ma è il fine soprannaturale, gratuito e non dovuto in alcun modo, consistente nel partecipare alla vita, alla conoscenza e all’amicizia con Dio.
È un fine, dice S. Tommaso, che l’uomo non può conoscere se non per rivelazione e non può accogliere che con la fede soprannaturale come un discepolo che lo impara dal magistero di Dio (per modum addiscentis a Deo doctore)” (Somma teologica, II-II, 2, 3).
La fede ha una dimensione oggettiva-intellettuale e una dimensione soggettiva-esperienziale. La prima dimensione comporta la conoscenza e l'adesione intellettuale alle verità rivelate, promulgate dal Magistero e vissute dai santi. La seconda dimensione comporta un rapporto personale con Dio uno e Trino e con la sua Chiesa. Se manca una di queste due dimensioni, non si vive la fede divina e cattolica. Proprio per questo è anacronistico il discorso di chi si dice cattolico a modo proprio, perchè la fede ha una dimensione oggettiva, non solo una dimensione personale e l'una influenza l'altra. Chi non per propria colpa, muore nell'ignoranza invincibile della vera fede e muore privo del battesimo sacramentale, può sperare la salvezza solo e unicamente se ha vissuto conformemente alla legge naturale. San Tommaso però, ammettendo questa che è un'eccezione alla norma, dice anche che a seguito del peccato originale, per una persona priva della grazia divina e della fede rivelata, vivere conformemente alla legge naturale è quasi impossibile. Da questo dato è evidente l'errore di chi illudendosi e illudendo proclama la facilità della salvezza per i non cattolici. Utile specificare, sulla scia di Giovanni Paolo II, che un cattolico che non vive conforme alla sua vocazione, non solo non si salverà ma dovrà rispondere in modo più grave davanti a Dio, dei doni di grazia che ha sprecato.
https://gloria.tv/article/12eYAGaip8CbSaicRH2jpNvxK

Fr. Franz Schmidberger Rector of SSPX seminary says Cardinal Walter's theological books heretical :Gloria TV news

Speaking to Gloria TV Fr. Franz Schmidberger the Rector of the Society of St. Pius X seminary in Germany declared that the theological books written by Cardinal Walter Kasper are modernist.He called Cardinal Kasper a heretic.


https://gloria.tv/video/Nz5k5AtEvohKKyFxmbPURygbR
https://serapion-media.gloria.tv/bonifacius/d/bq/bzdzcmi5rhooklbuxwi0j5rxdjuql7lyf1fghsyjs2.mp4?sum=IakJfJ2MkE-XUt1iN-BxXA&due=1470744000




MONDAY, AUGUST 8, 2016


Catholics confused with the writings of Archbishop Lefebvre and supporters

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/catholics-confused-with-writings-of.html

Catholics confused with the writings of Archbishop Lefebvre and supporters



Catholics are confused with the writings of Archbishop Lefebvre, Chris Ferrara, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari and others.
Their version of Vatican Council II is now obsolete.Since it was done with a false premise.
Vox Cantoris, Louie Verrecchio, John Salza and others cannot think for themself or they emotionally need Christopher Ferrara to think for them.Then Ferrara will only follow the line of Lefebvre even though a false premise is the basis of his theology
.1.

-Lionel Andrades

1.

VATICAN COUNCIL II IS NON NEGOTIABLE AND IN HARMONY WITH EENS: WE DON'T BOW BEFORE THE LEFEBVRIST OR LEFTIST ERROR

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/vatican-council-ii-is-non-negotiable.html




For all of them (FSSP,SSPX,liberal rabbis, Vatican Curia etc) there are exceptions to the traditional salvation theology associated with the 16th century missionaries http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/vatican-council-ii-is-non-negotiable.html


SSPX, FSSP Latin Mass in Rome today a rupture with Tradition but not for me

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/sspx-fssp-offer-latin-mass-in-rome.html


Traditionalists like Chris Ferrara and Bishop Fellay have been in ignorance all this time. The error was there before them but they did not notice it. Now it must be quote a job, for those who discern, to say that they had made a doctrinal mistake

 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/traditionalists-like-chris-ferrara-and.html


Remnant Newspaper removes comment : Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop Fellay holy cows http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/remnant-newspaper-removes-comment.html


FULL CIRCLE: it is important to reject the SSPX doctrinal interpretation of Vatican Council II based on ' a known catechumen'.The SSPX misleads Catholics

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/full-circle.html

Archbishop Lefebvre's modernism has had a big influence in the Catholic Church : Church Militant TV also promotes it

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/archbishop-lefebvres-modernism-has-had.html


Archbishop Lefebvre was a modernist too Christopher Ferrara must concede this

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/archbishop-lefbevre-was-modernist-too.html

Did Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre realize that the baptism of desire(BOD) issue was a mistake and there really was no BOD?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/did-archbishop-marcel-lefebvre-realize.html


The 'wrong definition of church' the new ecclesiology has come from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 error which was approved by Archbishop Lefebvre, the traditionalists of his time and the SSPX bishops and priests

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/the-wrong-definition-of-church-new.html

SSPX theologians have to decide if Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism, can there be two interpretations of the Council ? : one has the hermeneutic of continuity the other of rupture

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/sspx-theologians-have-to-decide-if.html


You conclude BOD is an exception to the dogma EENS. This is heresy.It is liberalism. It is what the SSPX would call modernism.Due to this irrationality you and the SSPX are interpreting Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/you-conclude-that-bod-is-exception-to.html



Nearly a year and sedevacantists will not answer if LG 16 refers to an invisible case : SSPX lay supporter suggests it is an invisible case but does not want to be quoted http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/nearly-year-and-sedevacantists-will-not.html



The SSPX is interpreting LG 16 as being physically visible for us. If they assume it is invisible for us, Vatican Council II changes.The reconciliation process with the Vatican changes http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/the-sspx-is-interpreting-lg-16-as-being.html


Now it is being asked who was this catechumen who was originally saved without the baptism of water which he desired before death ? How could there be a known case? How could any one know of any one who is saved without the baptism of water ? http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/now-it-is-being-asked-who-was-this.html



Prominent lay supporter of the SSPX still does not want to be quoted : Can you see people in Heaven? http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/prominent-lay-supporter-of-sspx-still.html



You tell me. Can you physically see people in Heaven? Can you see or meet someone in 2016 who is also Heaven?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/you-tell-me-can-you-physically-see.html


GOOD NEWS FOR THE SSPX AND SEDEVACANTISTS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/good-news-for-sspx-and-sedevacantists.html


Too many people are agreeing with me.They understand Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made a doctrinal and objective mistake. He contradicted common sense and the Principle of Non Contradiction

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/too-many-people-are-agreeing-with.html


Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops have made a mistake.It is a magisterial error approved by Cardinal Ratzinger as CDF Prefect and now as Pope Benedict XVI http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/this-was-mistake-archbishop-lefebvre.html



Archbishop Lefebvre was correct. Vatican Council II ( with known BOD and I.I) is a rupture with Tradition : He used the premise which was an innovation in salvation theology, in the Fr. Leonard Feeney Boston Case

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/archbishop-lefebvre-was-correct-that.html



There is no denial from traditionalists and pro SSPX bloggers.Archbishop Lefebvre made a doctrinal mistake.It was an objective mistake.He contradicted common sense and the Principle of Non Contradiction

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/there-is-no-denial-from-pro-sspx.html


Double speak from Signatories: Appeal to Cardinals

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/double-speak-from-signatories-appeal-to.html


Archbishop Lefebvre's Letter to Confused Catholics indicates he did not know of an alternative interpretation of Vatican Council II which had the hermeneutic of continuity and no ambiguity http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/archbishop-lefebvres-letter-to-confused.html



This was how Archbishop Lefebvre, Michael Davis and the Hildebrands interpreted Vatican Council II, it still is the interpretation of the Remnant and Wanderer news media http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/this-was-how-archbishop-lefebvre_31.html



Sell out by Archbishop Guido Pozzo and the Vatican : they refuse to interpret Vatican Council II without an irrational premise and conclusion

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/sell-out-by-vatican.html



No response from David Domet, Louie Verrecchio and Boniface when I say that they can interpret Vatican Council II with invisible for us LG 16, LG 14 etc being just invisible.That's all http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/no-response-from-david-domet-louie.html


Theological bankruptcy


http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/theological-bankruptcy.html
________________________________________________

VATICAN COUNCIL II IS NON NEGOTIABLE AND IN HARMONY WITH EENS: WE DON'T BOW BEFORE THE LEFEBVRIST OR LEFTIST ERROR

Comment from The Eponymous Flower :  Do Jews and Muslims Decide the Conditions for the Recognition of the SSPX?

VATICAN COUNCIL II IS NON NEGOTIABLE AND IN HARMONY WITH EENS: WE DON'T BOW BEFORE THE LEFEBVRIST OR LEFTIST ERROR
We Catholics need to affirm Vatican Council II without the Archbishop Lefebvre error.
We need to tell everyone, liberals and pro-SSPX supporters, that Vatican Council II is non negotiable.
Vatican Council II interpreted in line with EENS, and without the Lefebvre error, is indispensable.
We Catholics are not obliged to accept an interpretation of the Council II based on hypothethical cases being defacto and known in 2016.
We maintain good relations with Jews and Muslims not because of Vatican Council II but because Jesus asks us to do so.However there must be good relations with rational and traditional doctrines of the Church.Not those of the SSPX or the two popes.
Lisa Palmieri-Billig,Yahya Pallavicini,Rabbi David Rosen and the two popes interpret Vatican Council II with hypothetical LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc as being visible when for me they are invisible.
This is the rational option Catholics have in interpreting the Council.Presently they are confused with the writings of Archbishop Lefebvre, Chris Ferrara, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari and others.
Their version of Vatican Council II is now obsolete.Since it was with a false premise.
Vox Cantoris, Louie Verrecchio, John Salza and others cannot think for themself or they emotionally need Christopher Ferrara to think for them.Then Ferrara will only follow the line of Lefebvre even though a false premise is the basis of his theology.
He repeats the same nonsense every year like Bishop Fellay about a doctrinal problem, which they both are a part of.
Ask yourself why cannot any one refute me technically ? They cannot since they know that I am correct and that Archbishop Lefebvre was wrong.
They would like to prove me wrong only to prove Lefebvre correct -but they cannot.
For instance they say that the MHFM rejects the baptism of desire. This is a critical point against the Dimond Brothers. They cannot say the same for me. I accept BOD except that I am saying that I accept implicit for us BOD and reject explicit for us BOD. BOD can only be explicit for God.

Then they can criticise the sedevacantists for rejecting Pope Francis. They cannot use this argument against me.

There are others who criticise the SSPX and the traditionalists for rejecting Vatican Council II. They cannot say this against me. I accept Vatican Council II.
The liberals interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the dogma EENS. I do not.
I do not reject EENS.
And now I am saying that Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) and EENS ( Feeneyite) is non negotiable.
So technically no one has been able to show me where I am wrong doctrinally.They also know that I am correct doctrinally and can only criticise me for commenting on blogs,including their own, in which they cannot refute me.

-Lionel Andrades
https://eponymousflower.blogspot.it/2016/08/do-jews-and-muslims-decide-conditions.html?showComment=1470665644435#c137306136010315377

Therefore I am inviting you in a motherly way: come to the table of my Son. He is breaking bread for you; He is giving Himself to you; He is giving you hope; He is asking for more faith...- Our Lady at Medugorje (Message August 2,2016)


Image result for Photo of Our Lady of Medjugorje



OUR LADY'S MESSAGES
August 2, 2016
“Dear children, I have come to you, among you, for you to give me your concerns so that I may offer them to my Son; that I may intercede for you before Him for your good. I know that each of you has his concerns, his trials. Therefore I am inviting you in a motherly way: come to the table of my Son. He is breaking bread for you; He is giving Himself to you; He is giving you hope; He is asking for more faith, hope and serenity from you. He is seeking of you to battle within against egoism, judgement and human weaknesses. Therefore, as a mother, I am saying: pray; because prayer gives you strength for the interior battle. My Son, when He was little, often said to me that there will be many who will love me and call me ‘mother’. Among you, I feel love. Thank you. For the sake of that love I am imploring my Son that none of you, my children, will return home the same as he came; that you may take with you all the more hope, mercy and love; that you may be my apostles of love who will witness with their lives that the Heavenly Father is the source of life and not of death. Dear children, anew, in a motherly way I am imploring you, pray for the chosen ones of my Son, for their blessed hands - for your shepherds - that they may preach my Son with all the more love and in this way bring about conversions. Thank you.”
http://marytv.tv/featured-programing/fruit-of-medjugorje




A Moment With Mary


http://content.streamhoster.com/embed/playlists/ua?autoPlay=1#





Daily Rosary
 with Denis & Cathy

The Rosary prayed live - consecrating the internet to Our Lady of Medjugorje!




Tea With Rosie

For all of them (FSSP,SSPX,liberal rabbis, Vatican Curia etc) there are exceptions to the traditional salvation theology associated with the 16th century missionaries

The SSPX, Chris Ferrara and pro-SSPX bloggers need to say clearly that the Catholic Church teaches in Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus that all Jews and Muslims and other non Catholics, are oriented to the fires of Hell unless they convert into the Catholic Church, with faith and baptism(AG 7, LG 14).This should also be the position of Catholic cardinals and bishops and not just the SSPX and the sedevacantists.
Neither the SSPX or FSSP priests offer the Tridentine Rite Mass as it was offered in pre- Council of Trent times.Since they  interpret Catholic doctrine with the new theology approved by liberal Jews and Muslims mentioned in ths report.1
Related image
The new theology is a break with the old ecclesiology based on the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is how the liberal rabbis want the Church to interpret Vatican Council II.
So at the Latin Mass yesterday we had the liturgical form but not the ancient theology and Catholic doctrines.
For the SSPX being saved with the baptism of desire,for example, refers to someone in Heaven without the baptism of water.This is an interpretation according to Lisa Palmieri-Billig and Yahya Pallavicini.
This is the new theology.
Similarly this is the religious formation of FSSP priests and other priests in general. It is also the religious formation of the Internet Padre, Fr. John Zuhlsdorf, Dominican priests in Norcia and priests of the Institute of Christ the King who also offer the Latin Mass.
So the theology of the Latin Mass today is the same as that of Mass offered in Rome in other languages.It is approved by the political Left.
I repeat the ecclesiology of the priests offering Mass in Italian or English is the same as that of the FSSP and SSPX priests.This has to change and the change has to be expressed to the Jewish organisations.
For all of them (FSSP,SSPX,liberal rabbis, Vatican Curia etc) there are exceptions to the traditional salvation theology associated with the 16th century missionaries, when they offered the Latin Mass.
Related image
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf has reported that the bishop of Manchester, USA permits the FSSP priests to offer the Latin Mass in his diocese at a new church.They will do this of course with the new ecclesiology of the bishop approved by the Jewish Left organisations. 
The bishop interprets Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being objectively known. If he would consider hypothetical cases as being only hypothetical, then the Mass in English which Bishop Peter Libasci offers, would have the pre-Council of Trent ecclesiology.It would be unthinkable for the leftist Vatican.
Foto
In the diocese of Manchester the community of Fr. Leonard Feeney, the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, recognised by the bishop, had the Tridentine Rite Mass. They affirm the old ecclesiology on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. However they interpret Vatican Council II,like Bishop Libasci, as being a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.This is the Leftist interpretation of the Council.
So even though the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary attended the Latin Mass at their community chapel, their ecclesiology of Vatican Council II was a rupture with the past.Their position is the same as the SSPX and FSSP priests in Rome.
Image result for Photo of Mass at the  SSPX chapel Rome St.Catheruine of Sienna Chapel
I attended the Tridentine Rite Mass yesterday morning and also Mass in Italian in the evening. For me there was no break in ecclesiology.There was no rupture, in my mind, with the pre-Council of Trent ecclesiology. I interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The old ecclesiology supports an ecumenism of return and is the basis for the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King and Religious Liberty.
It is time that we realized that the SSPX is traditionalist but it is making a doctrinal error on Vatican Council II and this is being exploited by the Left,mentioned in this report.
Related image
We no more can accept what Chris Ferrara writes about Vatican Council II since it is based on an irrational premise ( visible cases of LG 16 etc) which is approved by the Jewish liberal organisations.
Nostra Aetate 4 says Catholics are the new people of God. Catholics are the Chosen People. Outside the Church there is no salvation.All need 'faith and baptism' (AG 7, LG 14) to avoid the fires of Hell.
-Lionel Andrades

1.

Do Jews and Muslims Decide the Conditions for the Recognition of the SSPX?

http://eponymousflower.blogspot.it/2016/08/do-jews-and-muslims-decide-conditions.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+TheEponymousFlower+(The+Eponymous+Flower)





SSPX, FSSP Latin Mass in Rome today a rupture with Tradition but not for me

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/sspx-fssp-offer-latin-mass-in-rome.html