I mentioned in a previous report:-
The CDF could clarify the points mentioned here.
Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson says there are no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Archbishop Pozzo could clarify if he agrees with him.
Fr.S.Visintin osb. Dean of Theology at the Pontifical University of St. Anselm, Rome says the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance do not refer to known cases.There are no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Archbishop Guido Pozzo could clarify if being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire refer to known exceptions, to the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus.2
Similarly the Catholic apologist John Martignoni says zero cases of something cannot be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Archbishop Pozzo could clarify if he considers Lumen Gentium 16 (saved in invincible ignorance) a zero- case with reference to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
He could also clarify if the magisterium made a mistake in the 1949 Boston Case and an injustice was done to Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center.He could also ask the Jesuits to issue a clarification, or rather an apology, on this issue.1
Archbishop Pozzo must not change the teachings of the Church to please his superiors