Friday, February 26, 2016

The Level 4 error is there in Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 of Vatican Council II


The Level 4 error 1 is also there in Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II.There was a mistake in Vatican Council II in the text inserted in Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 but Vatican Council II in spite of the error is not a break with Tradition.The mistake was there originally in the wrong decision on Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston.
Here is the text of Ad Gentes 7 without comments.

AD GENTES 7, VATICAN COUNCIL II
7. This missionary activity derives its reason from the will of God, "who wishes all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, Himself a man, Jesus Christ, who gave Himself as a ransom for all" (1 Tim. 2:45), "neither is there salvation in any other" (Acts 4:12). Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it." Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him (Heb. 11:6), yet a necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred duty, to preach the Gospel. And hence missionary activity today as always retains its power and necessity.
By means of this activity, the Mystical Body of Christ unceasingly gathers and directs its forces toward its own growth (cf. Eph. 4:11-16). The members of the Church are impelled to carry on such missionary activity by reason of the love with which they love God and by which they desire to share with all men the spiritual goods of both its life and the life to come.

Finally, by means of this missionary activity, God is fully glorified, provided that men fully and consciously accept His work of salvation, which He has accomplished in Christ. In this way and by this means, the plan of God is fulfilled - that plan to which Christ conformed with loving obedience for the glory of the Father who sent Him,that the whole human race might form one people of God and be built up into one temple of the Holy Spirit which, being the expression of brotherly harmony, corresponds with the inmost wishes of all men. And so at last, there will be realized the plan of our Creator who formed man to His own image and likeness, when all who share one human nature, regenerated in Christ through the Holy Spirit and beholding the glory of God, will be able to say with one accord: "Our Father."- Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II

Here is the text of the Ad Gentes 7 with comments.

AD GENTES 7, VATICAN COUNCIL II
7. This missionary activity derives its reason from the will of God, "who wishes all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, Himself a man, Jesus Christ, who gave Himself as a ransom for all" (1 Tim. 2:45), "neither is there salvation in any other" (Acts 4:12). Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware( Level 4 error here)  that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it." Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him ( Level 1, 2 and 3 error here)  (Heb. 11:6), yet a necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred duty, to preach the Gospel. And hence missionary activity today as always retains its power and necessity.
By means of this activity, the Mystical Body of Christ unceasingly gathers and directs its forces toward its own growth (cf. Eph. 4:11-16). The members of the Church are impelled to carry on such missionary activity by reason of the love with which they love God and by which they desire to share with all men the spiritual goods of both its life and the life to come.
Finally, by means of this missionary activity, God is fully glorified, provided that men fully and consciously accept His work of salvation, which He has accomplished in Christ. In this way and by this means, the plan of God is fulfilled - that plan to which Christ conformed with loving obedience for the glory of the Father who sent Him,that the whole human race might form one people of God and be built up into one temple of the Holy Spirit which, being the expression of brotherly harmony, corresponds with the inmost wishes of all men. And so at last, there will be realized the plan of our Creator who formed man to His own image and likeness, when all who share one human nature, regenerated in Christ through the Holy Spirit and beholding the glory of God, will be able to say with one accord: "Our Father."- Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II
Foto
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ERROR IN AD GENTES 7
Level 1. A hypothetical case is placed in Vatican Council II.Since in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 a hypothetical case was considered explicit, objectively visible and so an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).It begins with the FALSE PREMISE ( People in Heaven are visible to us on earth).

Level 2 . The hypothetical case excludes the baptism of water. If someone assumes AG 7 refers to a person saved without the baptism of water, this is stage 2 in the error.Level refers to an invisible case being visible and it excludes the baptism of water.FALSE PREMISE ( People in Heaven are visible to us on earth and they can be seen or known without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church).

Level 3 . There is a premise of a person saved in invincible ignorance, without the baptism of water and being physically visible to us human beings.FALSE INFERENCE ( So it is inferred  that these cases being visible and known in the present times are exceptions to all needing to be formal members of the Church, for salvation.It is 'knowing' ( with the fantasy, supernatural element) that an invisible case is visible.Then it is posited as an exception to the dogma EENS.

Level 4 . It infers  that  there are exceptions in general to the dogma EENS.Since there are known exceptions to EENS ( even though there really are no known cases) it FURTHER concludes that IN GENERAL not every one needs to enter the Church but only those who know about Jesus and the Church.
___________



Ad Gentes 7  with 'Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware...' is at Level 4.

Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him (Those saved in inculpable ignorance are hypothetical cases.They are at Level 1. They exclude the baptism of water (Level 2) and so they are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). This is Level 3.
1sister.jpg
The passage on inculpable ignorance (those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel)  is placed along side the orthodox passage on salvation (all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body) , as if it is an exception. They are placed together as if they are relevant. They were made relevant in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. In other words being saved in invincible ignorance is a personally known case ,without the baptism of water, for it to be relevant.
Can it really be a personally known case?
proffessions
Bros
We know this is false.Since beings saved in inculpable ignorance refers to a hypothetical case. No one has seen any one saved as such. We cannot see, know or meet any one saved without the baptism of water.They is known to have done it in the past too.
They made a mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and in Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14).
A hypothetical case ( being saved in invincible ignorance) cannot be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). All need to formally enter the Church with faith and baptism and there are no exceptions.
So being saved in invincible ignorance of the Gospel or with the so called baptism of desire were not explicit.They were not objective.So they were not relevant to the dogma EENS.

So the Holy Office and the Archdiocese of Boston made a mistake in the Father Leonard Feeney case.Since they believed that being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire referred to personally known cases, seen in the flesh, the new theory was that not every one needs to enter the Church, as was taught  for centuries, but only those who know about Jesus and the Church.
So this new theory based on a factual error, an objective error, a wrong observation, was placed in Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14).
-Lionel Andrades


1

LG 14 was a Level 4 error in Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/lg-14-was-level-4-error-in-vatican.html



LG16,LG 14, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc are not exceptions to EENS : Fr.Leonard Feeney's excommunication was a mistake
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/09/lg16lg-14-lg-8-ur-3-na-2-etc-are-not.html
smt

Their father was removed from Boston College when the President Fr.Keleher used an irrationality to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/09/their-father-was-removed-from-boston.html


Boston College used an irrational premise to remove Catholic professors including Dr.Maluf whose daughters are American religious sisters http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/09/boston-college-used-irrational-premise.html



They were always correct : there are no known exceptions to the dogma

 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/they-were-always-correct-there-are-no.html





Pope Francis, Jesuits review the Fr.Leonard Feeney case

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/pope-francis-jesuits-review-frleonard.html



JESUITS OPEN THE FR.LEONARD FEENEY CASE


Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits made a factual error in the text of Vatican Council II ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/message-incomplete-cardinal-cushing-and.html

Jesuit pope must be petitioned to correct the factual error of his community in the 1940's in Boston
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/03/jesuit-pope-must-be-petitioned-to.html#links

JESUIT SUPERIOR GENERAL REVIEW THE FR.LEONARD FEENEY CASE : THERE IS NO KNOWN CASE OF A PERSON SAVED WITH THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE WHICH IS VISIBLE

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/11/jesuit-superior-general-review.htm



http://catholicism.org/letter-to-a-young-man-discerning-a-vocation.html
http://catholicism.org/information-about-vocations-to-the-sisters.html
Photos from the website Catholicism.org   Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, St. Benedict Center, Richmond, N.H, USA.