Why are Catholics afraid of professing the Faith in all its glory?
A protestant-inspired catechetical program is sweeping parishes across the nation — and is doing more harm than good. Alpha for Catholics is a well-intentioned initiative to bring Catholics back to the Faith by focusing on a "personal relationship with Jesus Christ" — but it approaches that "personal relationship" from the erroneous idea that such a relationship can be had apart from the Church and Her sacraments — a thoroughly Protestant, non-Catholic idea. Read the ALPHA FAQ.http://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/the-downloadalpha-is-not-catholic
Why are Catholics afraid of professing the Faith in all its glory?
Church Militant TV sets a bad example.
They do not profess the Faith by saying there are no known cases of the baptism of desire in our reality for it to be an exception or relevant to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is something obvious.It is common sense. We cannot see or meet people on earth saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.
But if CMTV says this it would mean that there are no exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus and so the Holy Office 1949 and Pope Pius XII were wrong and Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center,traditionalists, were correct.
Abraham Foxman and the ADL will come down on the Archdiocese of Detroit.They will demand Michael Voris recant or be declared,once again, a non Catholic media.The Archbishop once before asked Michael Voris not to use the word 'Catholic'.So Real Catholic TV has become Church Militant TV.
Michael Voris could respond by saying that he is not denying the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. He only accepts them as being hypothetical and known only to God.They are definitely not 'practical exceptions' to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is something obvious.Even a young boy could confirm that we cannot see or meet people in Heaven who are there with the baptism of desire and without the baptism of water.People in Heaven are not seen on earth.
The Secretary to the Archbishop will still demand on social media that Michael Voris publically affirm that there are known cases of the baptism of desire in 2016.He has to say that the Emperor is wearing clothes.
The Archdiocese Secretary who approves of the Alpha program, will say that there are known and explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by St.Francis Xavier and the 16th century missionaries.Dr.Robert Fastiggi and Dr.Mark Latkovic among others at the Theology Faculty of the Sacred Heart Seminary in Detroit are saying just this. They agree with Archdioces Curia.
The Archdiocese Secretary who approves of the Alpha program, will say that there are known and explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by St.Francis Xavier and the 16th century missionaries.Dr.Robert Fastiggi and Dr.Mark Latkovic among others at the Theology Faculty of the Sacred Heart Seminary in Detroit are saying just this. They agree with Archdioces Curia.
Michael Voris would consider this ridiculous. How can he claim like the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 that hypothetical cases are not hypothetical but objective ? How can he claim that these allegedly objective cases are exceptions to all needing to be incorporated into the Catholic Church as members? How could he as an adult and Catholic say something so ridiculous?
The Archbishop of Detroit and the Jewish Left will once again remind Michael Voris to say that the baptism of desire case is visible and not invisible.
He will refuse to do so.It's easy for him to rebel.
They will then warn him to profess what is ridiculous and not part of the deposit of the faith. He could be willing to say as a compromise, that he accepts the baptism of desire as a theoretical posibility known to God and then too, it could be followed by the baptism of water, if God wills it.
CMTV will get a notice from a lawyer representing a Jewish Left organisation, ADL, ACLU etc.
Michael Voris will find himself in the same position as those U.S bishops who do not want to deny the Faith,but now they are 'afraid of professing the Faith in all its glory.'
These bishops are just like Michael Voris.
Too bad this is a story does not have a happy and heroic ending.It is in the tragedy-genre.
Today Michael Voris and the Download panel affirm visible for- us- baptism of desire.It is a 'visible' exception to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So they agree with Pope Benedict who in the interview with Avvenire said extra ecclesiam nulla salus is no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries. There is a development he said with Vatican Council II.
For the CMTV panel too there is 'a development' with Vatican Council II. Being saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16) and the famous case of the unknown catechumen who sought the baptism of water before he died ( LG 14) - refer to visible and not invisible cases. So this is a development in the Church. Upon this development is based the new theology which CMTV accepts.
So CMTV too, like Pope Benedict and Abraham Foxman and the Archbishop of Detroit, interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Vatican Council II has the hermeneutic of rupture with the Syllabus of Errors and Tradition in general, which is largely based on the dogma EENS with its exclusivist ecclesiology.
This is their tragic story.
It is not the case for me.
I affirm invisible for us baptism of desire and so it is easy to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.
So with invisible and hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire etc there are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.
For me Vatican Council II can only profess, in its text, an ecumenism of return.
Since there is no known salvation outside the Church there cannot be an Anonymous Christian theology.
Since there is no known salvation outside the Church, all political and social laws must have as its centre Jesus Christ as known in the Catholic Church, the only Church He founded, outside of which there is no salvation.This is important to save souls.
Catholics are the new people of God, the new Chosen People (Nostra Aetate 4).-Lionel Andrades
This is their tragic story.
It is not the case for me.
I affirm invisible for us baptism of desire and so it is easy to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.
So with invisible and hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire etc there are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.
For me Vatican Council II can only profess, in its text, an ecumenism of return.
Since there is no known salvation outside the Church there cannot be an Anonymous Christian theology.
Since there is no known salvation outside the Church, all political and social laws must have as its centre Jesus Christ as known in the Catholic Church, the only Church He founded, outside of which there is no salvation.This is important to save souls.
Catholics are the new people of God, the new Chosen People (Nostra Aetate 4).-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 1, 2013
Fr.Chad Ripperger and FSSP priests not permitted by the Vatican ( and the Left) to affirm the traditional teaching on salvation
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/08/frchad-ripperger-rip-on-truth-of.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment