Wednesday, November 23, 2016

The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate have set a precedent for all religious communities.They have announced that they accept Vatican Council II without Rahnerian theology.This is extra ordinary. Since they are not denying the Council and neither are they denying Tradition


The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate have set a precedent for all religious communities.They have announced that they accept Vatican Council II without Rahnerian theology.This is extra ordinary. Since they are not denying the Council and neither are they denying Tradition including the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They are not accepting Vatican Council II with ' a development'.
The 'development' has come with Rahnerian theology.It is  based on the baptism of desire etc being visible like the baptism of water.It is also wrongly assumed that these known cases of the baptism of desire  exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. Then it is inferred that there is 'a development of doctrine' since Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus, now has alleged exceptions. So all do not need to be incorporated into the Church as members is their new and non traditional  conclusion. This was the irrational conclusion of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.So with this new theology based on an irrationality Vatican Council II has many confusing texts.It is from this new theology comes the often reported 'ambiguity' of the Council.
The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate have said that they accept Vatican Council II without this new theology, which is responsible for the confusion and ambiguity in Vatican Council II.
They affirm Vatican Council II without ambiguity and in harmony with the old ecclesiology based on Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and which is rejected by ecclesiastical masonry and the Jewish Left rabbis.
So the Franciscans Sisters of the Immaculate true to their religious formation would affirm the Syllabus of Errors.No one can say that the Syllabus of Errors does not apply any more since there are 'developments' in Vatican Council II. The developments came only by assuming hypothetical cases are not hypothetical, by assuming LG 16, LG 8 etc refer to explicit cases and exclude the baptism of water.
But there are no such such cases in 2016.Practically we do not know any one as such.
There are no such known cases over the last 100 years.De facto know one could have seen someone in Heaven without the baptism of water.
We humans cannot see someone saved in Heaven as such.Neither can we see or meet someone on earth who will be saved outside the Church, without Catholic faith.
So there is no ambiguity in Vatican Council II on this issue for the Sisters.
The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate are saying 'all' Jews, Muslims and other non Christians need to be incorporated into the Church  with 'faith and baptism' for 'salvation'(Ad Gentes 7).This is a citation from Vatican Council II and there are no explicit exceptions mentioned in the Council text.They are citing magisterial texts. It is not a personal opinion of theirs.
The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate are saying all need to be formal members of the Church for salvation and they can cite Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441 as a reference and there are no known exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II.There are no known exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to the Council of Florence on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Since they have eliminated Rahnerian theology, they have avoided the Cushingite error which came into the Church with the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.They are affirming Feeneyism instead which is traditional.St.Thomas Aquinas and St.Augustine were Feeneyites when their salvation theology is interpreted without the irrational premise  to get a non traditional conclusion.
This means all Catholic religious communities, all Catholics, can affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise and conclusion.The Council is traditional.
It would mean ecclesiology has not changed at the Traditional Latin Mass and the Novus Ordo Mass. It also means those Catholics who have married non Catholics are living in adultery. Their spouse is outside the Church.They are living in mortal sin.
-Lionel Andrades
 
 
 
November 22, 2016

Ave Maria! The doctrinal issue has been resolved in favour of the SSPX and the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate.No one can fault them theologically or doctrinally.


November 21, 2016
Can the SSPX accept Vatican Council II like the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate to get canonical status ? : No one tells the pope that he is interpreting Vatican Council II with bad philosophy and bad theology which has now been exposed




http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/11/can-sspx-accept-vatican-council-ii-like.html
 

July 7, 2014

Asking the Franciscans of the Immaculate to accept Vatican Council II with an irrational inference violates their conscience : laws in Italy

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/asking-franciscans-of-immaculate-to.html
 

 

Can the Franciscans Friars and Sisters of the Immaculate affirm Vatican Council II without this fantasy premise ? No one at the Vatican Press Office wants to answer

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/can-franciscans-friars-and-sisters-of.html#links
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/franciscans-of-immaculate-are-not.html#links

Vatican wants the Franciscan Friars and Sisters of the Immaculate to accept this irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/vatican-wants-franciscan-friars-and.html#links

Lombardi says Franciscans of the Immaculate a 'delicate subject' : ignores Vatican's doctrinal ambiguities

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/lombardi-says-franciscans-of-immaculate.html#links

No comments: