Thursday, August 4, 2016

You conclude BOD is an exception to the dogma EENS. This is heresy.It is liberalism. It is what the SSPX would call modernism.Due to this irrationality you and the SSPX are interpreting Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition

Comments from the Eponymous Flower
  1. No, I think Lionel just takes Our Lord at His word.
    Delete


  2. nice non-responsive non-seqitor. I'm sure that Pius X, Aquinas, Bonaventure Ligouri, Augustine, the fathers of Trent inter multus alios will be shaking in their heavenly boots at Lionel's binding declarations. He (and you) will have much to teach them one day.

    Peace be with you Tancred.
Susan,
For you the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It is the same for the SSPX bishops and priests.
It is not so for me:-
 
So the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance do not contradict the Church Fathers and the Popes on Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus.They were never in the first place, exceptions to EENS or relevant to EENShttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/so-baptism-of-desire-and-being-saved-in.html
 
Defacto, in real life, practically,BOD does not contradict the Popes on Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/defacto-in-real-life-practicallybod.html
 
By assuming there are physical cases of the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, all without the baptism of water, the contemporary Church has rejected the rule, the general teaching on salvation over the centuries
 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/by-assuming-there-are-physical-cases-of.html
 
Susan, first of all your position on the baptism of desire etc is irrational. Since the BOD refers to a hypothetical case and so cannot be explicit in the present times.Then you conclude that BOD is an exception to the dogma EENS. This is heresy.It is liberalism. It is what the SSPX would call modernism
Due to this irrationality you and the SSPX are interpreting Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition.

So with this false premise dogmatic teachings are changed http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/08/so-with-this-false-premise-dogmatic.html
-Lionel Andrades
 
 

  1. http://eponymousflower.blogspot.it/2016/07/statements-of-competent-archbishop.html#comment-form
Posted by at
Labels: , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)