Lionel:
Susan,
Tancred(The Eponymous Flower) and Prof.Phillip Blosser, professor of Philosophy at the Sacred Heart Seminary Detroit and owner of the blog Musings of a Pertinacious Papist - agree with me.
Even Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson, Fr.S.Visintin osb, Dean of the Theology at the Pontifical University of St.Anselm, Rome and John Martignoni, the apologist at EWTN agree with me. I am not saying anything new or personal.It is obvious that there are no physically known cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.
It is a given that hypothetical cases of being saved in invincible ignorance( LG 16) etc cannot be explicit and objectively known in 2016. So they cannot be relevant or exceptions to all needing faith and baptism; all needing to be formal members of the Church for salvation.
This was a mistake Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops have made.It is a magisterial error approved by Cardinal Ratzinger as CDF Prefect and now as Pope Benedict XVI.
Tancred(The Eponymous Flower) and Prof.Phillip Blosser, professor of Philosophy at the Sacred Heart Seminary Detroit and owner of the blog Musings of a Pertinacious Papist - agree with me.
Even Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson, Fr.S.Visintin osb, Dean of the Theology at the Pontifical University of St.Anselm, Rome and John Martignoni, the apologist at EWTN agree with me. I am not saying anything new or personal.It is obvious that there are no physically known cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.
It is a given that hypothetical cases of being saved in invincible ignorance( LG 16) etc cannot be explicit and objectively known in 2016. So they cannot be relevant or exceptions to all needing faith and baptism; all needing to be formal members of the Church for salvation.
This was a mistake Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops have made.It is a magisterial error approved by Cardinal Ratzinger as CDF Prefect and now as Pope Benedict XVI.
Tancred August 1, 2016 at 3:59 AM
He's right about this.
APRIL 6, 2016
Yes! I am glad you have understood what I have been saying! Praised be Jesus and Our Lady.The issue comes down to our having no known cases of known salvation outside formal membership in the RCC
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/yes-i-am-glad-you-have-understood-what.html
MARCH 29, 2016
"Thanks for providing this! God bless the Society!", " I agree with much of what Lionel says" http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/thanks-for-providing-this-god-bless.html
http://www.onepeterfive.com/in-his-own-words-cardinal-schonborn-on-exhortations-deepest-concerns/
-Lionel Andrades
Archbishop Lefebvre was correct. Vatican Council II ( with known BOD and I.I) is a rupture with Tradition : He used the premise which was an innovation in salvation theology, in the Fr. Leonard Feeney Boston Case
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/archbishop-lefebvre-was-correct-that.html
Posts
susanAugust 1, 2016 at 6:10 AM