There is continuity with the past if Feeneyism is the theology used to interpret Vatican Council II. There is no continuity with the past if Cushingism is the theology.The theology of Pope John Paul II like that of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was Cushingite

(29:09) Now the Catholic Church does not teach in the Second Vatican Council or after that non Catholic churches are part of the one holy , Catholic and apostolic Church on earth.This was made clear in the year 2000 in Dominus Iesus and it points out that the Catholic faith ful are required to profess that there is a historical continuity rooted in the Apostolic Succession between the Church funded by Christ and the Apostolic Catholic Church.This is the single Church of Christ are Saviour after His Resurrection, which he entrusted to Peter's care,commissioning him and the other apostles to extend and rule Her.Erected for all ages as the pillar and maintsay of the truth.This Church constituted and organised as a society in the present world subsists in the Catholic Church governed by the Successor of St. Peter and the bishops in communion with him.It is just repeating what was taught at the Second Vatican Council-Dr.Robert Fastiggi

Lionel:

The theology of Dominus Iesus is Cushingite.It is based on the new theology,

_____________________________

(44:02) The questions is if John Paul II is the Roman Pontiff and depends whether there is doctrinal,disciplinary and liturgical continuity between pre-Vatican Council II and post Vatican Council II-Bishop Donald Sanborn

Lionel:

There is continuity with the past if Feeneyism is the theology used to interpret Vatican Council II. There is no continuity with the past if Cushingism is the theology.The theology of Pope John Paul II like that of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was Cushingite. So there was no continuity between pre and post Vatican Council II. If an irrational premise is used in the interpretation then the conclusion will be non traditional.This is obvious.

-Lionel Andrades